Salman Rushdie: A Socrates of the Global Village

685 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Philosophy about socrates

Salman Rushdie is a man who isn't afraid to speak his mind. When Salman Rushdie wrote his novel The Satanic Verses it influenced chaos between the Moslems people and Rushdie. Socrates gained enemies for speculating about things far above and far below the earth. Rushdie can be considered a Socrates of the global village because Salman Rushdie is someone who publicly spoke his mind on what he believed in and gained enemies like Socrates.
Salman Rushdie was known for going against Islam, the prophet and the Koran. To that purpose Salman gained enemies for writing The Satanic Verses. Salman Rushdie was sentenced to death with no trial. Socrates had his own point of view within philosophy and gained Athen enemies by telling respected Athen men know they aren't wise. Socrates had to be present in court to defend himself among accusations made upon him. An Iranic Cleric offered a cash reward to anyone who killed Salman Rushdie. Salman offered a public apology to whoever was insulted by his novel; however, the Iranic Officials did not approve his statement. Socrates doesn't apologize for letting people know they aren’t wise. Socrates stands by his words no matter the trouble it might have cost him. ( Phillips 16, Plato 20)
The Ayatollah's statement came after months of mounting protests against Rushdie's novel The Satanic Verses by upset Moslems, who blame Rushdie for insulting their religion. The protest involved British Moslems burning copies of Rushdie's book, the protest extended to Pakistan and India, where a lot of people died in the aggressive demonstration. (Phillips 16) Socrates had many Athens people viewing him negatively for many years. Instead of violent protests, Socrates was made fun of. A comedic play by Aristophanes,...

... middle of paper ...

...edieval times. Moslems leaders claim that the title of the novel The Satanic Verses disrespected their god, because it refers to their god as Satan. Even though Rushdie was raised as a Moslem, and claims he follows no religion, the Khomeini mentions that Rushdie rejected the words of his former religion, therefore, joined the enemies of Islam, and committed a crime.(Phillips 18) In the Islam tradition, the Koran is factually the word of God, transmitted by the Archangel Gabriel through the Prophet Mohammed. The result of Rushdie's novel is viewed as mocking wordplay.(Phillips 19) Socrates gained enemies for his speculations on philosophy. Socrates had young rich men followers who viewed him as an inspiring leader, therefore, was also blamed for teaching the youth his ideas. Both Salman Rushdie and Socrates were held responsible for religious insult. (Plato 20 - 24)

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Muhammad: A Biography Of The Prophet By Karen Muhammad

    1338 Words  | 3 Pages

    Muhammad is a novel written by Driss Chraibi a distinct modern North African novelist and journalist. The novel is simply not about the Prophet Muhammad, but a novel about a man from Mecca named Muhammad who later became the prophet of the great religion of Islam. In this novel the author did not tent to apply the deification of Muhammad, but rather explained the human part of him, which was indeed as great as a human being could ever be. Also, this novel is not intended to discuss the life of Muhammad from a historical point, but a novel further explains the characters of Mohammad. Yet, the author emphasized that this book is not biography of the Prophet on a traditional religious account. Thus, the book is not a historical work, but the author

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Xenophon And The Apology

    1209 Words  | 3 Pages

    Socrates then questions him again about whether or not he alleges that he corrupts the youth intentionally or unintentionally. Meletus’ reply was that he does intentionally. Socrates begins to argue with Meletus about his previous statement and, what seems to become, more and more agitated with the fact that Meletus goes back and forth with his argument for the simple facet that he wants Socrates to face the death penalty which is evident in several occasions throughout Plato’s apology. Also, throughout Plato’s version of The Apology, he also makes sure that it is known that his first charges arose from general prejudices that surrounded him over the

    Read More

  • The Apology and Crito

    345 Words  | 1 Pages

    In today’s society, no man can be sentence to die because he speaks out his mind, everyone is entitle to freedom of speech. If Socrates were alive today, he would have being able to express his mind with out being sentence to die.

    Read More

  • Ibn Rushd's Five Religious Problems

    764 Words  | 2 Pages

    Like others before him, Ibn Rushd was critiqued for proposing that faith must be guided by reason. In his view, the noblest manifestation of love was to study God through His creation, the function of the brain. Ibn Rushd's rationality was in the custom of predominating Islamic scholasticism, with endeavors to orchestrate Islamic logic and reason in light of the accessible Greek legacy. In the book “On the Harmony of Religions and Philosophy (Kitab fasl al-maqal) he brings forward five interesting “problems” as he has called them. They are: Problem First: the Creation of the Universe, Problem Second: The Advent of the Prophets, Problem Third: Of Fate And Predestination, Problem Fourth: Divine Justice and Injustice, Problem Fifth: The Day of Judgment. I believe that Averroes’s main arguments in the book are questions that come into every human beings head subconsciously. The questions of where do we come from? And who created us? The divine law teaches that the world is created by God and so are the living things such as humans. None of it was created by chance or by itself. Now that it is clear through the divine law that the world is created by God, we start to linger around the question of “why”? Why it all was created? What’s the purpose? And here is when philosophy comes into the picture. Philosophy being a study of the basic nature of existence can help towards a better understanding of religion. Averroes argues that philosophy and religion can never be in conflict because simply truth does not contradict truth. It only makes sense to correlate philosophy and religion due to the fact that that they complete each other. Philosophy is the way of thinking; religion being reason.

    Read More

  • Major Themes of the Koran

    4800 Words  | 10 Pages

    We have coined for mankind in this Koran all kinds of similitudes, that haply they may reflect; a Lecture in Arabic, containing no crookedness, that haply they may ward off [evil.] [39:27-28]

    Read More

  • How Does Aristophanes Present Plato In The Apology

    904 Words  | 2 Pages

    In his play, The Clouds, Aristophanes lampooned Socrates by presenting him as the paradigm of atheistic, scientific sophistry. Yet it is unlikely that Aristophanes would have intended these charges to be taken seriously, since Plato depicts Aristophanes and Socrates as being on very good terms with each other in the Symposium. "For those who are examined, instead of being angry with themselves, are angry with me!" This is the essential reconciliation for why Socrates is considered wise, and, at the same time, acquired a bad reputation among the most socially powerful

    Read More

  • Saman Rushdie Controversies

    703 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...tion to the controversies surrounding The Satanic Verses and the Ayatollah Khomeini fatwa. Although, Rushdie's future publications never reached the success or the controversies of The Satanic Verses he is still an important literary icon.

    Read More

  • Compare and Contrast: Socrates and Jesus Christ

    1058 Words  | 3 Pages

    Socrates, according to Plato challenged the norms of society by questioning life and having others question it as well. He was labeled of “corrupting the youth” and for not believing in the Athenians gods. “Socrates is guilty of corrupting the young, and of not acknowledging the gods the city acknowledges, but new daimonic activities instead.” (The Apology, pp 654) Although, he was cast by being “corrupt”, Socrates had many followers that saw him as a wise man. Socrates trial was made up of thirty jurors, who were later known as “The Thirty.” The “Thirty” really wanted was to silence Socrates, rather than taking his life. However, Socrates did not want to disobey the laws, he did not want to be violated of his right to freedom of speech, nor did he did he want to be undermine his moral position. (The Apology, pp. 647) He stood against injustice acts several times while he was in counsel. “I was the sort...

    Read More

  • An Apology From Socrates

    1717 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Apology is Socrates' defense at his trial. As the dialogue begins, Socrates notes that his accusers have cautioned the jury against Socrates' eloquence, according to Socrates, the difference between him and his accusers is that Socrates speaks the truth. Socrates distinguished two groups of accusers: the earlier and the later accusers. The earlier group is the hardest to defend against, since they do not appear in court. He is all so accused of being a Sophist: that he is a teacher and takes money for his teaching. He attempts to explain why he has attracted such a reputation. The oracle was asked if anyone was wiser than Socrates was. The answer was no, there was no man wiser. Socrates cannot believe this oracle, so he sets out to disprove it by finding someone who is wiser. He goes to a politician, who is thought wise by him self and others. Socrates does not think this man to be wise and tells him so. As a consequence, the politician hated Socrates, as did others who heard the questioning. "I am better off, because while he knows nothing but thinks that he knows, I neither know nor think that I know" (Socrates). He questioned politicians, poets, and artisans. He finds that the poets do not write from wisdom, but by genius and inspiration. Meletus charges Socrates with being "a doer of evil, and corrupter of the youth, and he does not believe in the gods of the State, and has other new divinities of his own."

    Read More

  • A Rhetorical Analysis Of Islam

    227 Words  | 1 Pages

    The misinterpretations of these verses states Islam characteristically brutal by the commentators of Islam and preferential individuals.

    Read More

  • Socrates was a Wise and Harmless Man

    1122 Words  | 3 Pages

    Within the duration of this document, I will be discussing the charges laid against Socrates and how he attempted to refute the charges. One of the reasons why Socrates was arrested was because he was being accused of corrupting the minds of the students he taught. I personally feel that it is almost impossible for one person to corrupt the thoughts and feelings of a whole group of people. Improvement comes from the minority and corruption comes from the majority. Socrates is one man (minority).

    Read More

  • Thomas W. Lippman's Understanding Islam

    1218 Words  | 3 Pages

    Understanding Islam gives a broad outline which could help to erase American misconceptions about this religion, and could be helpful in easing global racial tensions. The book is not top of the line scholarship about Islam; it is for the uninformed or otherwise unaware beginner. After reading this book the reader has a basic understanding of Islam, devoid of many American or western misconceptions. However, Lippman explains that the holy book is not spelled "Koran," but rather "Qur-an," though he uses the first spelling throughout the book (56). The real version is written in arabic, but I would have rather him used the more authentic spelling. In this way I see that this book was beneficial, but not the final word. It is a good book because it lays a positive foundation for Americans, and hopes to inspire them to continue their study of a fascinating religion.

    Read More

  • The Erosion Of Free Speech

    1884 Words  | 4 Pages

    That is, Feb. 14th, 1989, to be specific. John O’Sullivan at the time worked at a panel on press freedom for the Columbia Journalism Review. On that day, an audience member brought up the British novelist Salman Rushdie, specifically on Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s religious pronouncement of blasphemy against the novelist. O’Sullivan recalls, “saying most of the right things about defending freedom of thought and the imagination.”. He also noted how the media, specifically the political worlds, was in defense of Rushdie. The novelist even becoming “a hero of free speech and a symbol” [O'Sullivan, John]. The ‘curtain of security’ for Rushdie lasted many years, however, it was not forever. As when it seemed those in support of him were also at risk, publishers, editors, and translators, his support thinned. People’s belief in free speech were contrasted against fear among other things, and rationalization as O’Sullivan puts it “spread outward”. This was far from the only event to have transpired over the last twenty or so

    Read More

  • Socrates and the Sophists

    675 Words  | 2 Pages

    Socrates was a philosopher who set out to prove, to the gods, that he wasn't the wisest man. Since he could not afford a "good" Sophist teacher, surely a student of one had to be smarter than he. He decides to converse with the youth of Athens, but concludes that he actually is wiser than everyone he speaks with. He then realizes that their lack of intelligence is the fault of their teachers. Socrates understands that the practice of "sophism" leads to a lack of self-knowledge and moral values. Socrates was later accused of corrupting the youth of Athens and put on trial. In The Apology of Socrates he sta...

    Read More

  • The Future Of Islam And Politics

    1544 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...e misinterpretation done by extremists and terrorists. Although the Qur’an might have controversial and sometimes rebuttal verses it all depends on the audience and the preacher. “The future of Islam and Muslims is inextricably linked to all of humanity. All of our futures will depend on working together for good governance, for freedom of religion, speech, and assembly, and for economic and educational advancement. Together we can contain and eliminate our preachers of hate and terrorists who threaten the safety, security, and prosperity of our families and societies.” Esposito’s final comment about what we as humanity should do in order to save the future of Islam is almost unimaginable yet it is at the same time the only rational way for human prosperity and peace.

    Read More

More about Salman Rushdie: A Socrates of the Global Village

Open Document