The Role of Richard Parker in Yann Martel’s Life of Pi

881 Words2 Pages

Richard Parker is the character everyone will remember from Life of Pi, if only for the fact that he’s a tiger. He is terrifying, beautiful and apathetic; he’s also possibly half-eaten by sharks at the bottom of the Pacific Ocean without ever having stepped foot in a lifeboat, depending on what story the reader prefers. This poses an interesting question to the reader of the novel; if Richard Parker is only present in one of the stories, the tale with a lifeboat packed with animals, what does he represent in the story devoid of zoo animals entirely? An examination of Richard Parker’s comparison to other characters and actions will reveal that he symbolizes an animalistic side of the titular character. For the purposes of this essay, “animalistic side” means the side of Pi that behaves more like an animal than like a human, and is also willing to do whatever it takes to survive.

At the end of the novel, two Japanese officials listen to both of Pi’s miraculous accounts, then spot a connection between the two, exclaiming that “the Taiwanese sailor is the zebra, [Pi’s] mother is the orangutan, the cook is...the hyena--which means [Pi is] the tiger!” (311) This demonstrates that the animals Pi encounters on his boat are representative of humans, as each animal matches up with a human from the second story. This, logically, means that “[Pi is] the tiger!” However, there’s a monstrous hole in this theory. The flaw in believing that Richard Parker symbolizes Pi is that Pi himself appears in both stories. Matching up the tiger with the Pi from the second story still leaves a leftover Pi, the one from the first story. Clearly, this evidence shows Richard Parker does represent an aspect of Pi, but does not represent all of him. If Richa...

... middle of paper ...

...someone who matures from a scared boy to a survivor. By using Richard Parker to demonstrate this part of Pi, Yann Martel makes the novel a better story, while at the same time making a point about the cost of survival. Using an animal forces the reader to realize how much Pi has changed, that he is embracing more and more his survival focused side, that he is becoming like Richard Parker the tiger. It also says something about survival itself. By the end of the journey, Pi has dispatched so many creatures, which goes against what he believed prior to the sinking. Is it worth forfeiting what makes you human to save your life? Is survival worth the cost of embracing one’s inner animal? Pi seems to think so; after all, Richard Parker was only ever a reflection of him.

Works Cited

Martel, Yann. Life of Pi: A Novel. New York: Harcourt, 2001. Print.

Open Document