Robber Barons and the Captains of Industry Made America's Economy of Today

864 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Positive and negative effects of robber barons

Money makes the world go around so that people could either become rich or poor. The whole issue with businesses came up in the 18th-19th century and was created by two factions in US history, the Robber Barons and the Captains of Industry. These two are what made the way America’s economy it is today. The Robber Barons and the Captains of industry were both very similar but completely different with how they operated in the economic world. Robber Barons made wealth in a variety of ways but still maintained the sense of thieves from the way they attained their wealth and treated their people hence forth their name. The Robber Barons were considered a unlikable form of business because of the effect they had a negative effect on the community. The Robber Barons whole idea and purpose was to make money for themselves by means of which is immoral to society. Most of the money collected by Robber Barons were taken from the people and their community further proving that they had gained a lot if not most of their wealth from the people without giving back to their town. The Robber Barons would also have their workers working in extremely harsh conditions that were harmful to their health and mental state, only to be made worse by the wages they were getting paid. These businesses refused to see their workers as people; instead they saw their workers as parts of a machine that can always be replaced. This was partially the fault of 'Social Darwinism'. This meant that the most fit would succeed to become rich while others would not. This idea was created by Andrew Carnegie, a businessman of the steel industry, although the first intention was to make sure that government would stay out of the affairs of big businesses. Carnegie, a Capta...

... middle of paper ...

...ckefeller, in order to soften the appearance of him and his company, he also engaged in philanthropy and founded the University of Chicago and the Rockefeller foundation which helped educational institutions.
While it is true that these capitalists’ wealth widened the gap between the rich and poor, the discussion that these men were more like the leaders of a growing industry is even more valid. These Northern capitalists led the South away from the depending of farming for their economy, but more importantly, they used their wealth for the growth of America’s industry. If these men did not transfer their wealth towards philanthropist educational development, there would have been no idea for industrial development. And if the American industry could not develop, it would have never have risen to industrial excellence, which has made what our economy what it is now.

Show More
Related

  • American Colossus The Triumph Of Capitalism Summary

    1553 Words  | 4 Pages

    He does this again in part two: frontiers of enterprise. In chapter eight of part two he discusses two different enterprises that did not occur in the same time period but both affected a large number of people who were wealthy and poor. The enterprises were the Union Pacific Railroad company and the industry that was created when the South was being rebuilt. The connections made allows readers to create a mental timeline of events in history that impacted the growth of capitalism which affected the American democratic

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Rockefeller And Jp Morgan

    699 Words  | 2 Pages

    These industrialists are the pillars of the American society due to the successful outcomes of their hard works. Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller were both born in an underprivileged families. Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller became the breadwinner of the family at a young age. They both worked hard despite of being born to a

    Read More

  • Industrial Statesmen Vs Robber Barons

    79 Words  | 1 Pages

    There were two different types of men during the industrial age: the “industrial statesmen” and the “robber barons”. Industrial statesmen were a group of men whose businesses have immensely and positively affected the United States. A group of people who cruelly ruled over their workers and most of the time lived above the law were called "robber barons". John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and J.P Morgan were some industrialists that were both labeled as "industrial statesmen” and “robber

    Read More

  • Robber Barons Pros And Cons

    792 Words  | 2 Pages

    Both Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller dominated giant corporations, but they dictated much of the employees and greatly tried to divide out the employees from desperately trying to organize the reforms that would essentially stop the robber barons from taking advantage of them. The robber barons insisted that if you cannot work the day you are supposed to other than the Fourth of July, some other person will be a willing participant to come and take your job. The economy was dramatically failing because the wealth had been handed out unfairly and much the industry workers in the mining factories decimated during the accidents that occurred in those horrible working conditions. Due to the corruption of the government in the Gilded age, which lasted from the 1870 to the 1900s, most of the working class poor were barely struggling to stay alive and more family members had no choice but go into the labor force to provide for the family. The robber barons were held with much hostility in the society of American Capitalism. The society tried to look at the world in a scientific perspective that according to Social Darwinist’s theory in America, the human society was viewed in regards to the working class poor and the issues of poverty as a result of their own failure, the lack

    Read More

  • The Industrial Leaders of the 19th Century Should be Admired for their Work

    664 Words  | 2 Pages

    These were the great men during their time. They took the American dream and made it come true. These were risk takers and men that recognized opportunity. The time after the Civil War saw the creation of an industrial business boom. These men were either in the right place at the right time, but no matter the reason they succeeded. The most important part is that they show us that with determination and patience you can make a life for yourself. These men were not selfish with there money. Carnegie and Rockefeller both gave millions upon millions of dollars to charities and other causes.

    Read More

  • Big Businesses During The Progressive Era

    1545 Words  | 4 Pages

    Leaders such as Carnegie, Rockefeller, Morgan, and Ford were all philanthropic and gave away their money to those in need. For instance, Andrew Carnegie had given a total of over $350 million in his lifetime and had centered his philanthropy on education and the quest for world peace. Carnegie built libraries mainly because he wanted to promote self-education and that he wanted everyone to have the access to books. He founded Carnegie University. He had always thought that “The rich have a moral obligation to give away their fortunes.” John D. Rockefeller donated over $550 million in his lifetime. Rockefeller built the University of Chicago and then founded Rockefeller University. The Rockefeller Foundation was his last charitable foundation and he had such an abundant amount of money that the foundation is still working “to promote the well-being of mankind throughout the world.” J.P. Morgan was an equally giving philanthropist after he retired from banking. He had become the president of the Metropolitan Museum of Art while he was also a trustee (lead donor, vice president, treasurer, and finance committee chairman). His love for the natural sciences gave way to the American Museum of Natural History. Morgan was also a part of the Episcopal Church which he had devoted a great deal of time to. Henry Ford

    Read More

  • Examples Of Greed In The Great Gatsby

    2143 Words  | 5 Pages

    Money is something that can either be used for the greater good of society, or it can be contorted into something that is detrimental to society, it all depends on whose hands that money happens to fall into. Human tendencies begin to change once people come to have money, the lavish and selfish lifestyle begins. Entitlement comes with having money because money gives people what they want which makes people think they are entitled to get everything they want. In The Great Gatsby Fitzgerald portrays that money is the root of all problems with can ultimately lead to loneliness and careless behavior.

    Read More

  • The Robber Barons

    731 Words  | 2 Pages

    When the names Carnagie, Rockefeller, and Pullman come to mind, most of us automatically think of what we saw or read in our history books: "These men were kind and generous and through hard work and perseverance, any one of you could become a success story like them," right? Wrong. I am sick of these people being remembered for the two or three "good deeds" they have done. Publicity and media have exaggerated the generosity of these men, the government has spoiled these names with false lies, and people have been blind to see that these men were ruthless, sly businessmen who were motivated by your money and their struggle for power.

    Read More

  • Cornelius Vanderbilt

    2191 Words  | 5 Pages

    The want for wealth saturates everyone’s mind at one point or another. Almost everyone dreams of having the large mansion near the beach, the multiple cars, etc., but this money does not just come, it either has to be inherited or earned. During the 1800s, most wealth was inherited, but there were a few self-made men that worked their way from the bottom to the top in order to become wealthy. One man in particular influenced wealthy men to come like Andrew Carnegie and Rockefeller. He was able to begin many of the ideas brought about during the Gilded Age because not only was he a major influence in society, but he greatly changed the economy and the industries he was involved in during that time. Lastly, he modernized commerce for businessmen to come. Cornelius Vanderbilt has become one of the most famous names in American history because of the everlasting positive changes he introduced to the country. Cornelius Vanderbilt was an inspiration for future wealthy personas of the Gilded Age because he fought to limit competition in the developing railroad and steamboat industries; his tactics in these industries lead him to great wealth, which helped him wield enormous power and influence over the American economy and politics.

    Read More

  • Comparative View of Wealth Accumulation in America

    1058 Words  | 3 Pages

    The era that marked the end of civil war and the beginning of the twentieth century in the united states of America was coupled with enormous economic and industrial developments that attracted diverse views and different arguments on what exactly acquisition of wealth implied on the social classes in the society. It was during this time that the Marxist and those who embraced his ideologies came out strongly to argue their position on what industrial revolution should imply in an economic world like America. In fact, there was a rapid rise in the gross national product of the United States between 1874 and 1883. This actually sparked remarkable consequences on the political, social and economic impacts. In fact, the social rejoinder to industrialization had extensive consequences on the American society. This led to the emergence of social reform movements to discourse on the needs of the industrialized society. Various theories were developed to rationalize the widening gap between the rich and the poor. Various reformers like Andrew Carnegie, Henry George and William Graham Sumner perceived the view on the obligation of the wealthy differently. This paper seeks to address on the different views held by these prominent people during this time of historical transformations.

    Read More

  • Themes Of The Anebellum South

    1599 Words  | 4 Pages

    “These men rose to power in a region embedded in a capitalist country, and their social system emerged as part of a capitalist world.” However, that does not indicate that the South was capitalist. Genovese argues the opposite that the Antebellum South was rather pre-capitalist. “Their society, in its spirit and fundamental direction, represented the antithesis of capitalism”. Slavery inhibited the economic development of the South and endangered the social stability of the South due to their irrational tendencies. These irrational tendencies allowed them to maintain the master-slave relationship but allowed the South to fall behind the North. Genovese states that “the capital outlay is much greater and riskier for slave labor than for free” and “the sources of cheap labor usually dry up rather quickly, and beyond a certain point costs become excessively burdensome”. Why maintain a labor system that is unstable? With the increase of production and slaves results in a labor system that the South cannot sustain. The slaves’ production was also inefficient. However, Slaves were found to be efficient “in hemp, tobacco, iron, and cotton factories” and “received a wide variety of privileges and approached an elite status.” The South could have industrialized and expanded the economy with these factories but the master-slave relationship if disturbed can lead to a power shift in the South. If the blacks approached

    Read More

  • America’s Antebellum Capitalists: Captains of Industry or Robber Barrons?

    496 Words  | 1 Pages

    More often than not, America’s antebellum capitalists are accused of being the “robber barons” of industrial America. The misconception is that these men took advantage of a naïve and growing economy and reaped its benefits without giving anything in return. True, the majority of America was poor in comparison to the few elites, but the philanthropist efforts and contributions of these men can not be denied. If not for these men and their efforts, there would have been no one to pave the road to America’s industrial domination.

    Read More

  • Industrial Revolution Effects

    1012 Words  | 3 Pages

    The growth of factories and all other associated businesses created numerous opportunities for those seeking to increase their wealth. It wasn’t just the Rockefellers and the Carnegies that benefitted from this period in American history. Many small businesses were also created as a result of the tremendous development of the cities. Income growth for all Americans saw significant increases. Prior to this period, most income was gained from farming and most farmers earned enough to sustain their homestead from year to year. Machinery soon replaced the hand tools and animal-powered farm implements which allowed the farmers to increase their crop yields per season as they were able to farm more land effectively. Higher yields equalled higher profits for farmers. Before the Civil War it took 61 hours of labor to produce an acre of wheat. By 1900, it took 3 hours, 19 minutes. Those who left the farms for the cities were greeted by factories and businesses in dire need of a work force. This also created many opportunities for jobs ‘in the middle’, those jobs between the elite monopolists who owned the businesses and the lower paid laborers who worked the assembly lines at the factories. The American middle class has its roots in the Industrial Revolution.

    Read More

  • Three Great Men that Embodied the American Dream

    1374 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...s. These three men read book after book and educated themselves further to reach their goals and dreams even when people never thought it would be possible. Benjamin Franklin did not need to go to college to influence and educate the public with his writings. Henry Ford it made it possible for the average people to go places with their own vehicle. Andrew Carnegie used his success and money to influence others. These three men have shown me the drive, the aggressiveness, the love they had to build their careers. In order to have the American Dream you have to want it and never stop fighting for it.

    Read More

  • Money Is The Key To Success

    1394 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Money is number and numbers never end if it takes money to be happy your search for happiness will never end.” (Bob Marley). For the majority of people in our modern-capitalist world, money is the first thing, and sometimes the only thing that measures success in life. Money can buy power. Money can buy fame. Money can buy time. Sometimes money can even buy a life. So money has become the first common goal for everybody. There are many different perspectives, and how people view the world, in terms of success, and money. Money is not the root of all evil, but the love of money is the root of all evil.

    Read More

More about Robber Barons and the Captains of Industry Made America's Economy of Today

Open Document