Risks of Cardiac Surgical Procedures

2250 Words5 Pages

Maintaining adequate levels of cerebral perfusion during cardiac surgical procedures is of utmost importance in achieving positive neurologic outcomes and minimizing length of hospital stay. Because cardiac surgical interventions ranging from major aortic arch reconstruction to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) each carry their own inherent risk for developing perioperative strokes, transcranial near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is an interesting technique that may shed light on hypoperfusion events and decrease the overall incidence of stroke (4, 13). The use of transcranial near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) to monitor cerebral oxygenation levels was first developed over thirty years ago (1). Recent studies over the past fifteen years have created much excitement about its potential applications and overall clinical value. Although NIRS is currently being used to noninvasively measure cerebral oxygen saturation (ScO2) during many cardiac and vascular surgeries, there remain many questions about its true therapeutic value (1). This literature review will offer a brief description of the NIRS technique as well as an overall assessment of current available studies highlighting the use of cerebral oximetry during cardiac surgical interventions.

Cerebral Complications Associated With Cardiac Surgery – change title?
Adequate cerebral perfusion is necessary to maintain proper oxygenation and meet aerobic metabolic demands (4). However, brain ischemia associated with cardiac surgical intervention can have many etiologies and can be hard to identify (1,4). While cerebral emboli is a major cause of perioperative strokes, more serious consideration is being placed on the influence of cerebral hypoperfusion resulting in perioperative n...

... middle of paper ...

...erative baseline values and resulted in a decrease in POD from 13.3% in 2009 to 7.3% in 2010 (p=0.019), but no significant change in average ICU LOS, going from 2.11 days in 2009 to 1.83 days in 2010 (p=0.228). Although the new HBCS improved POD rate, there is no way to confidently attribute the decrease in delirium rate to either the use of TCD or NIRS. Not every patient in 2010 received TCD, NIRS, or both, with only 49.1% of patients receiving NIRS monitoring, and 34.0% receiving both. In addition, without a set protocol, intervention was dependent on anesthesiologist discretion allowing for bias and human error. The author also states that simply the awareness among anesthesiologists about the importance of maintaining adequate cerebral blood flow in addition to preserving blood pressure may have contributed to the decline in POD rate among intervention patients.

Open Document