The Rise of Democracy in Great Britain

912 Words2 Pages

Greece was once at the pinnacle of the world. Its philosophy, sculptures, paintings, theater, and architectures have been some of the great gifts it has left for us, but the most important one is democracy. It is believed that democracy was created in a city of ancient Greece; this city is known as Athens. The success Athens had as a city is credited to the way they ran their government. In this city everyone had an equal say on what they wanted to get done. Undoubtedly, democracy has been the best ancient idea for every country in the world to keep. Great Britain has an amazing history as a super power that had at one point had its own empire. They were definitely successful, yet they were did not have a democracy set up, and it actually took several years for Great Britain to do that. So when did Great Britain become democratic and why? The main reason why Great Britain transitioned from a monarchy to a democracy was because of the Industrial Revolution.
In the middle ages, monarchy was extremely strong in Great Britain. There were many remarkable kings and queens; there were kings like James I, George III, Henry VII, and many others who are known for accomplishing things like separating the Catholic Church from England or for being challenged by the American colonists. During this period of time people were not allowed to think for themselves. Both the church and the monarchy did not allow people to have their own ideas or to express their opinion. Kings had absolute control over everything from increasing taxes to imposing a religion on their people. Everyone within the British kingdom was suppressed to think like the king and live for the king. There were only two kinds of people during this time, there were those who were no...

... middle of paper ...

...at it is today. It is interesting that Great Britain after becoming a democratic country still kept the monarchy, and does not have an official written constitution.

Works Cited

Albert, Craig, William Graham, Donald Kagan, Steven Ozment and Frank Turner. "Toward Parliament Government in England" The Heritage Of World Civilizations. 9th. Combined. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2011. 462. Print.
The Official Website of The British Monarchy. The Role of the Monarchy. Retrieved November 08, 2013, from http://www.royal.gov.uk/monarchuk/howthemonarchyworks/howthemonarchyworks.aspx
Welcome to a History of England - History of England. The Dark Ages (450 - 1066) - Introduction - History of England. Retrieved November 07, 2013, from http://www.historyofengland.net/kings-and-queens/the-dark-ages-450-1066-introduction#the_dark_ages_450__1066__introduction__summary

Show More
Related

  • Ring around the Rosie: Turning Points in History

    1001 Words  | 3 Pages

    Burns, William E."Britain in the Late Middle Ages, 1272–1529." A Brief History of Great Britain, Brief History. New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2010. Modern World History Online. Facts On File, Inc. http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?

    Read More

  • The Rise of a Mass Democracy 1824-1840

    1643 Words  | 4 Pages

    When the Democrats rose to power in the White House, they replaced most of the people in offices with their own people (the common man). These people were illiterate and incompetent. This system of rewarding political supporters with jobs in the government was known as the "spoils system."

    Read More

  • Democracy In The 19th Century

    1358 Words  | 3 Pages

    Democracy in the United States became prominent in the early to mid 19th century. Andrew Jackson, the 7th president of the United States, was inaugurated in 1829 and was best known as the person who mainstreamed democracy in America. Because he came from a humble background, he was the “genuine common man.” (Foner, pg. 303) He claimed he recognized the needs of the people and spoke on behalf of the majority [farmers, laborers]. However, critics of Jackson and democracy called him “King Andrew I” because of his apparent abuse of presidential power [vetoing]. These critics believed he favored the majority so much that it violated the U.S. constitution, and they stated he was straying too far away from the plan originally set for the United States. Because of the extreme shift of power to the majority, the limiting of rights of the few [merchants, industrialists] and the abuse of power under Jackson’s democracy, the foundational documents set in the constitution was violated, and the work of the preceding presidents were all but lost.

    Read More

  • Middle Ages: Dark or Not?

    1118 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the year 476 A.D., Rome officially fell as the greatest and most thriving empire at the time. The time period following this downfall was called the Middle Ages, more infamously recalled as the Dark Ages; but were these years truly as dark as historians say? These medieval times lasted for approximately one thousand years, could such a long time period have been all that dreadful? The answer will soon become clear. The Middle Ages deserved to have the alias of the Dark Ages because there were several severe illnesses, the monarchs were cruel, and the crusades brought the death of many.

    Read More

  • Essay On The History Of The Middle Ages

    547 Words  | 2 Pages

    The era of the Middle Ages does not paint a bright picture for many people because it was a dark time in history. The Middle Ages were a terrible time to live in with the grime, debauchery, and disease. The rich were very well off while the poor made it through a hard life. The decline of the Middle Ages was at the end of the fourteenth century because of, “crop failures, famine, population decline, plagues, stagnating production, unemployment, inflation, devastating warfare, abandoned villages, and violent rebellions by the poor and weak of towns and countryside, who were ruthlessly suppressed by the upper classes.”1 Even though the Middle Ages were a time of adversity it did have great growth...

    Read More

  • Absolute vs. New Monarchs

    1025 Words  | 3 Pages

    Monarchy was not at all a new institution in the 15th, 16th, or 17th centuries. It wasn’t even very different with respect to the goals that prevailed in each monarchy. However, the differences between the New and Absolute Monarchy come in the way of the methods, theories, and conditions prevalent throughout the different monarchical reigns.

    Read More

  • Macbeth vs Scotland, PA

    2343 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Web. The Web. 23 Nov. 2011. The "Middle Ages - Information, Facts, and Links." ENotes - Literature Study Guides, Lesson Plans.

    Read More

  • Declaration Of Independence

    1071 Words  | 3 Pages

    take it anymore. But when there is a long train of abuses and attacks it is the people's right, it is their duty, to get rid of the government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — The same as these colonies have patiently suffered; the same that now forces them to change their old systems of government. The history of the present king of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and attacks, all contributing to the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to an honest world.

    Read More

  • Insight into Human Nature in Geoffrey Chaucer's Canterbury Tales

    1394 Words  | 3 Pages

    England, in Chaucer's time, was a nation of social and economic growth. Medievalism was a dominant influence in the lives of Englishmen, but the Renaissance had assumed definite form, and the country stood on the threshold of the modern world. Medieval Europeans asserted that the ideals of spiritual community, social groups and national interests were greater than individualism. In Chaucer's time, there were many manifestations of rebellion against the old order of things, including an influx of mysticism and materialism. People demanded more voice in the affairs of their government and viewed the Catholic Church as corrupt. An emerging religious reformation, which placed emphasis on individualism and national patriotism, along with the upsurge of manufacturing and commerce, gave rise to the English middle class.

    Read More

  • Should the British Monarchy be Abolished?

    842 Words  | 2 Pages

    The monarchy symbolizes unity and traditions, which is unique and treasured to the nation. The monarch universally known as head of the Commonwealth, she is voluntarily recognised as the Head of State to 54 independent countries (The British Monarchy, 2013) The Queen to modern Britain, is an icon, who cannot simply be swapped for an elected politician. The British monarchy has played huge importance in British history, which is integral to our national identity. The Queen reined for 61 years and she provides an existing connection between the past, present and future. This is exactly what a politician could not offer to the public; for instance, Tony Blair, prior to 1997 was unknown on a state level, as he had done nothing significant for the British public. The monarchy’s traditions are famous not only in the United Kingdom but throughout the world. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II is the ruler of sixteen other countries including Britain. Whilst the queen receives many privileges as head of state, it does come at a personal cost. Her privacy is limited as she is consistently scrutinized from t...

    Read More

  • The Influence Of The Catholic Church In The Middle Ages

    861 Words  | 2 Pages

    European history, the middle ages, or medieval period, lasted from the 5th to the 15th century (Middle Ages). During that period of time, the Catholic Church was the largest, and most important part of people’s lives. It influenced all parts of European society, from the poorest, to most powerful including the King. This influence was cause by the people turning to their priests for religious guidance, giving them agency over nearly every facet of their lives.

    Read More

  • The Concept of Absolute Monarchy in King Lear by William Shakespeare

    1406 Words  | 3 Pages

    The concept of absolute monarchy comes into existence during the early seventeenth century. For England at this time, the Tudor dynasty ends, while the Stuarts begin theirs. However, it is the latter dynasty that brings the concept into mainstream politics, because “early Stuart political discourse can indeed be read as containing defences of absolutism” (Burgess 19). James I is the first king of the Stuart line and the first to practice absolute monarchy. It is said of him at the time that “James [I] described [sic] his ideal form of government . . . from which he sought [sic] to justify his own absolute authority and power . . . hence he was [sic] to be free and absolute, to be the law in and of his kingdom” (Jordan 15). In coincidence, the beginning of James’ reign coincides within the same time Shakespeare wrote King Lear. In his play, several scenes link together, showing that even though the king supposedly gave up his job, he cannot escape the fact that he is king and will be until his death. These scenes exemplify certain aspects of absolute monarchy. Indeed, the seventeenth century theory of absolute monarchy provides evidence that, although King Lear bestows his role as king to others, he ultimately retains the absolute power and behavior of a monarch in Shakespeare’s famous tragedy.

    Read More

  • Great Britain During World War II

    1434 Words  | 3 Pages

    In international affairs, the Attlee government introduces a major change of direction, beginning the dismantling of the British Empire. The empire is gradually transformed into a Commonwealth of independent nations, capable of accommodating republics as well as monarchies. Works Cited Gascoigne, Bamber. " HISTORY OF THE GREAT BRITAIN (from 1707). " History of the World.

    Read More

  • The British Political System

    2037 Words  | 5 Pages

    The British Monarchy. “The Queen in Parliament.” The Royal Household. Accessed May 4, 2014. https://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/QueenandGovernment/QueeninParliament.aspx.

    Read More

  • Fall of Man in John Milton’s Epic Poem, Paradise Lost

    930 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the reign of Charles I, the people of England were divided into two groups due to their opinions on how the country should be run: The Royalists, and the Parliamentarians. The Royalists were those people who supported Charles I and his successor, while the Parliamentarians were those who supported the idea that Parliament should have a larger role in government affairs. Milton was a Parliamentarian and was an outspoken enemy of Charles I, having written numerous essays and pamphlets regarding his ideas as to how the government should be run, and “In one very famous pamphlet, he actually defended Parliament's right to behead the king should the king be found inadequate.” Charles I was seen as a corrupt and incompetent ruler, and “the Parliamentarians were fed up with their king and wanted Parliament to play a more important role in English politics and government.” This belief was held because of the unethical and tyrannical behavior of ruler Charles I. During his reign, he violated the liberties of his people and acted with hypocrisy and a general disregard for his subjects. Examples of his abuse of power in...

    Read More

More about The Rise of Democracy in Great Britain

Open Document