1.0 Introduction
The question was concerning that restraint of trade in Singapore was continuing evolve and the restraint of trade clause in restrictive contract was used by the employer to prevent employee from leaving and joining a competitor.
Nowadays, there are many companies would use restraint of trade clauses in the employment covenants. It used to prevent employee from joining competitors in the future in order to void the competitive with others competitors in same industry. Besides, restraint of trade is normally applied in the sale of business agreement.
The restraint of trade on employment contracts and sale of business agreement are used to protect trade connections and trade secrets. The clauses must be reasonable and not harm the parties in the contracts. However, when the restraint of trade clauses are used to prevent competition or prevent a person from exercising a trade, they will be unenforceable.
The Singapore Court of Appeal held that the clause in restraint of trade was void when former employees set up competing businesses with their former employers. This can be discussed in cases Mano Vikrant Singh (MVS) v Cargill TSF Asia Pte Ltd [2012] and Smile Inc Dental Surgeons Pte Ltd v Lui Andrew Stewart [2012].
The discussion of the topic which concerning the restraint of trade are as the following. This is supported by some cases in the following discussion.
2.0 Meaning of Restraint of Trade in Singapore
Restraint of trade is performing as a restrictive in employment contracts (restrictive covenants). The employer used restraint of trade clauses to make a non-competition with other competitors. However, the court would void if there was found that the restraint of trade clauses was including in the restr...
... middle of paper ...
...VS) v Cargill TSF Asia Pte Ltd [2012] and Smile Inc Dental Surgeons Pte Ltd v Lui Andrew Stewart [2012] were the recent cases which were the good examples in explaining the invalidity of restraint of trade clauses.
From viewing all these examples, the courts in Singapore are giving more protection to the employees. The court held the better decisions to prevent employers restricted the liberal of the employees. Most of the restraint of trade clauses restricted the liberal of the employees which caused them not dare from leaving the former employment even it is worse for him. Besides, the employees would also not dare from joining the competitors after leaving the former employment. It would be caused the employees lose their living income. In conclusion, the restraint of trade was invalid in Singapore. The clauses would be void if it concerned restraint of trade.
Non-compete agreements are usually found in employments contracts in where a company wants to prevent their employees from working for a competing company. The focus of the non-compete agreement is to protect a company’s business interest and trade secrets but, a non-compete covenant must be laboriously drafted to follow the state’s regulation in order to be enforced in court. There is an enormous discrepancy when it comes to cases that deal with non-compete agreements since it deals with revising if the non-compete agreement was lawful to begin with; courts do not have a consistent approach to this. A lot of companies request the courts to enforce the covenant but, in most cases, the agreement is unenforceable due to the unethical and unlawful
It has to do with eliminating barriers that are put in place to protect the producers in a country. The barriers that countries implement include tariffs and taxes, quotas, rules and regulations and government subsidies or tax breaks (pg 58). The primary goal of a trade agreement is to lower these barriers so that any international company involved in the agreement(s) can be competitive in another country that is also involved in the agreement(s). One of the key features of the TPP agreement is to eliminate tariffs and some of the other barriers in order to create new opportunities for workers and businesses and to also benefit
Additionally, in an effort to establish and standardize fair trade practices in interstate and international commerce, the government enacted laws that were directed toward labor unions and the labor relations process. These laws have either benefited or were detrimental to labor organizations.
9. Sherman Anti-Trust Act – 1890 – forbade combinations in restraint of trade, without any distinction between “good” and “bad” trusts.
Blanpain, R and Bamber, G J. (2010). Comparative Labor Law and Industrial Relations in Industrialized Market Economies: Xth and Revised Edition. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
This is an explicit or implicit agreement between existing firms to avoid or limit competition with one another.
Outlawing certain conduct by employers that generally has the effect of either preventing the organization of employees or emasculating their unions where they do exist; these forbidden acts are called unfair labor practices.
He had a keen interest in working in the Pacific Rim for which he was eventually rewarded a position of Chairman on Board (COB) at the Factory in China. What we noticed is that due to Control's relative inexperience and lack of understanding of joint venture, James was recalled only after completing one third of his contract length, to be replaced by a relatively inexperienced employee from Singapore (Jimmy Chao). Controls Asia Pacific, in doing so, ignored the fact that they might threaten the success of the joint venture. This case shall try and analyze what factors may have caused this pull out to occur, what may be its consequences, and what we feel should be done, in order to reinstate trust and confidence to make the joint venture a success. Adaptation, Acceptance and Experience.
The exclusion clause is an important device for allocating the risks between the contractual parties. However, the exclusion clauses could mostly be found in written contracts, especially standard form of contracts. Standard form contracts with consumers are often contained in some printed ticket, or delivery note, or receipt, or similar document. In practice, it is very common that if a person wants the product, he may have no alternative but to accept the terms drawn up by the other party even though such terms are disadvantage to him, or he may simply accept it regardless the possible unfavorable position because he does not trouble to read a long list of terms and conditions. Therefore, contracts are regularly signed, tickets are simply accepted, or a tick-box on a website is clicked, commonly between large companies and individual consumers.
...the potential interference of the market into the legal trade circle may be shaped up to match the interest of the involved traders.
John W. Budd & Devasheesh Bhave (2006). Sage Handbook of Industrial and Employment Relations. Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota. Chapter 5.
The Employment Act in Singapore is an act that covers every employee who is under the contract of service to their employer except employees engaged under managerial and executive levels or domestic workers. If either party intends to end the contract, they may do so with a notice of their motive of termination. Employees may need to serve a notice period before leaving, which ranges from 1 day to 1 month.
We begin our study of free trade by understanding the four principles of individual decision making.... ... middle of paper ... ... Edge, Ken, “Free trade and Protection: advantages and disadvantages of free trade” NSW HSC online http://www.hsc.csu.edu.au/economics/global_economy/tut7/Tutorial7.html#more Accessed November 29, 2011. Net Aparijita, Sinha, “What are the disadvantages of free trade?
The following essay aims at highlighting and analyzing the main political arguments for trade intervention and the rationale behind this.
This essay will look at the definition of what an employer and employee are according to legislation. It will then discuss whether or not an employer can prevent an employee from working for others (or themselves), after the employment has ended. Analysis will be done on whether restraint of trade clauses are legal and if so the restrictions they carry for both employer and employee. This essay will also look at how and if a restraint of trade clause can be changed so that they can be valid and the employer can enforce them. This essay will look at whether employers can stop employees from working for others and themselves during employment, this will be done by looking at and discussing garden clauses. Critique will be done on both restraint of trade clauses and garden leave clauses. The essay will conclude with how difficult or easy it is for an employer to restrict their employee’s employment.