Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis on organizational changes and stress
Impact of change in the organisation
Analysis on organizational changes and stress
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis on organizational changes and stress
INTRODUCTION
An organizational change disturbs the structure of organizational life in terms of interpersonal relationships, reporting lines, group boundaries, employee and work unit status. (Paulsen et al., 2005; Terry and Jimmieson, 2003). Although change is implemented for positive purposes (like to adapt the changing environmental conditions and to remain competitive as well), its is observed that employees often respond negatively toward change and resist the overall efforts. This negative reaction is largely because change brings with it increased pressure, stress and uncertainty for employees (Armenakis and Bedeian, 1999; McHugh, 1997).
One of the main reasons causing the failure to bring change is of employee resistance to change; the significance of resistance is compounded by the high rate of change failure. Thus, building positive employee beliefs, perceptions and attitudes is critical to bring a successful change (Armenakis et al., 1993; Eby et al., 2000).
In an effort to identify how organizational change can be managed more effectively, researchers have focused on the processes underlying employee resistance.
A number of studies have identified issues that concern staff during organizational change (Covin and Kilmann, 1990; Lewis, 2000). Leader behavior is important during organizational change, as leaders provide a vision for the change; give direct support to employees that is why such kind of actions help to bring stability during change and enhance employees’ commitment to it.
Till date, little research has examined employees concerns about retaining positive aspects of an organization’s culture during change. In a systematic approach to identifying key issues during organizational change, Oreg (20...
... middle of paper ...
...D. and Keller, R.T. (1979)” The measurement of job characteristics”, Acadmey of Management Journal, Vol. 19, June, pp. 195-212
Terry, D.J. and Jimmieson, N.L. (2003), “A stress and coping approach to organizational change: evidence from three field studies”, Australian Psychologist, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 92-101.
Verma, A. 1995. Employee involvement in the workplace. Research in personnel and human resource management, eds M. Gunderson and A. Ponak. New Haven, CT: JAI Press.
Wagner, A.J. 1994. Participation’s effects on performance and satisfaction: A reconsideration of research evidence. Academy of Management Review 19: 312– 30.
Weisbord, M.R. (1992) Discovering Common Ground, Berrett-Koehler, San Fransico, CA.
Whitney, J.O. (1994), The Trust Factor: Liberating Profits and Restoring Corporate Readiness for change, McGraw-Hill New York, NY.
Mariana, P., Daniela, B., & Nadina, R. (2013). Forces that enhance or reduce employee resistance to change. Annals of The University Of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 22(1), 1606-1612.
Change is a double-edged sword (Fullan, 2001). Change is a word that might inspire or put fear into people. Leadership is challenging when it comes to dealing with change and how individuals react within the organization to the change. Marzano, McNulty, and Waters (2005) discuss two orders of change in their book School Leadership that Works; first and second. Fullan (2001) also adds to the discussion in his book Leading in a Culture of Change, with regard to understanding change. In Change Leadership, Keagan and Wagner (2006) discuss many factors of change and the systematic approach to change. Change affects people in different ways. Leaders need to be able to respond to the individuals throughout the change process.
Change affects more than just a program or a process within an organization, change affects employees, collecting data on employee’s readiness and willingness to accept a change will help leaders know if the organization is socially ready for change (Cole, Harris, and Bernerth, 2006). A change might be positive for an organization but if the employees who will be affect by the change are lost in the process then it could create a greater issue than not making the change. Leadership needs to communicate and inspire the employees to be positive toward the change, seeking to enhance their job satisfaction not make changes that will increase their desire to leave. This data is best collected early in the change initiative allowing leadership to properly cast the vision while addressing concerns. This requires leadership to create platforms for employees to engage in the change initiative freely (Ford, 2006). Employee attitudes can be measured through these dialogues providing leadership with necessary measureable data (Hughes, 2007).
Changing situations throughout the world affect all organizations in business today. Therefore, most organizations acknowledge the need to experience change and transformation in order to survive. The key challenges companies face are due to the advancements in technology, the social environment caused by globalization, the pace of competition, and the demands regarding customer expectations. It is difficult to overcome the obstacles involved with change despite all the articles, books, and publications devoted to the topic. People are naturally resistant to fundamental changes and often intimidated by the process; the old traditional patterns and methods are no longer effective.
The transformation of a company requires hundreds, sometimes thousands of employees to adopt a new view of its future, a future they must regard as essential. Change management involves managing the process of achieving this future state. Change can be viewed from two vantage points, that of the people making the changes and that of the people experiencing the changes. In the top-down, or strategic viewpoint associated with management, the focus is on technical issues such as the investment required, the processes for implementing the change, how soon the change can be realized, and the outcome. In the bottom-up viewpoint of the employee, the focus is on what the change means to the ...
Managing resistance starts with dialogue that engages and reveals the underlying reasons for resistance (A. Gilley, J. Gilley, & Godek, & 2009). Resistance to change is a complex issue and managers and leaders need to take the time to understand why and where the resistance is coming from if they have any chance of being successful. There are numerous reasons why an employee might be resisting the change and there are lots of approaches to address resistance, but without understanding why there is resistance, leaders are unprepared to deal with the issue. Therefore, leaders need to make the time to involve employees in the process, understand and respect their concerns, and work towards clear and focused goals.
Implementing change in the workplace is a dynamic process. Although change itself can be controlled and limited to some degree, innovation is substantially even more dynamic. This dynamic, unpredictable process introduces vulnerability, which can lead to employee frustration. Just as the scenario addresses, many individuals become motivated at the thought of change and innovation; however, the change does not occur due to resistance or other obstacles. Much of this resistance arises from the unpredictability and vulnerability of the process. Managers must be able to prevent or manage resistance by using tools and strategies to smooth the process.
Change in an organization occurs when an organization identifies an area of where necessary change must be undertaken, examines it thoroughly and adapts to it. This may lead to gaps where employees may not adapt to a certain change and therefore it is important that an organization takes into considerati...
Middlebrook, B., Caruth, D., & Frank, R. (1984, Summer 85). Overcoming Resistance to Change. Management Journal, 50(3), pp. 23.
From information gathering and research, organizational change management is similar in a way that psychology explores people’s behaviors in the workplace by creating theories and set of principles to compliant with the o...
Toribio, C. T., & Hernandez, R. G. (2011). Coping with resistance to change in organizations (Unpublished masters thesis). Linnaeus University, Sweden. Retrieved from http://lnu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:425506
Transformational leaders and managers who have strong lines of open communication with their employees have been shown to lessen stress and resistance during organisational change (Nging & Yazdanifard, 2015). Heckelman (2017) outlines four tools that best equip managers for dealing with organisational change:
Robbins et al. (2011, p. 186), states ‘Change is an organizational reality and affects every part of a manager’s job’. Today’s wave of change primarily created by economic condition so change is now such a constant feature of organization life (Goodman, E. 2011, p.243). Organizations need to be changed at one point or another in structure, technology or people. These changes are defined as organizational change (Robbins et al. 2011, p.18). Organizational change is important because changes can increase effectiveness and efficiency, the innovation of products, services as well as dealing with changes in external and internal forces (Goodman, E. 2011, p.243). However, ‘the bottom line is that organizational change is difficult because management systems are design and people are rewarded for stability’ (Lawler, E.E. & Worley, C.G. 2006, p.11).
Individuals go through a reaction process when they are personally confronted with major organizational change (Kyle, 1993; Jacobs, 1995; Bovey & Hede, 2001). Within this process there are four phases that it consists of: initial denial, resistance, gradual exploration, and eventual commitment (Scott & Jaffe, 1988; Bovey & Hede, 2001). Resistance to change is the initial area to focus on. The issues of organizational change and resistance to change have received a lot of attention over the past decade (Macri, Tagliaventi & Bertolotti, 2002). The perceptions of individuals play a fu...
The employee reflects change in an organization as a shift of role, responsibilities and skill. However, in an organizational level its refers change as a framework structure around the changing needs and capability of an organization to perform. Both employee and organization’s perception of change are needed to ensure the change is successful. Brown (2011) reported that “the role of change as a corrective action often affect patterns of work or values, and in consequence meet with resistance” (p. 144). Once an organization and its member decide to conduct a change program, they intensify the forces that driving the change. The life cycle of employee’s resistance is necessary in accomplishing change in an organization. There are five important phases in a life cycle of employee resistance to change in an organization, namely introduce the change, forces of change emerge, direct conflict happens in an organization, residual resistance appear in an organization and lastly, establish the change. (refer to Figure 1 in Appendix 1).