Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
sexuality issues in religion
religion gender and homosexuality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: sexuality issues in religion
As a student enrolled in a particularly large state university, I am consistently exposed to numerous individuals who hold different belief and value systems that guide their lives on a daily basis. One of the most fundamental systems that people adopt is a religious belief, varying widely from the Atheist to the Buddhist to the Christian, and these beliefs have the potential to have a profound impact on many of the key elements of a human experience, one of the most important being the sexual experience. Researchers have long sought out relationships between factors of different religious beliefs and practices and their effect on the individual’s approach to sexuality, finding varying results (Ahrold 619).
In a study conducted at the University of Texas, researchers asked 1413 students to fill out a questionnaire analyzing the “religious group differences in sexual attitudes and sexual fantasy”, as well as the differences of attitudes and fantasies across different domains of religion, such as spirituality, fundamentalism, intrinsic religiosity, and paranormal beliefs (Ahrold 621). After conducting the study and using statistical techniques to analyze the results, the researchers were left with a plethora of data that pertained to many different subsets of religion and sexuality. One of the results I found important to sexuality today was stated “In men, compared to women, there was a less significant effect of both religious group and individual differences in measures of religiosity”, illustrating that the variation of religious factors could be less accountable for the sexuality of males (628). In contrast, women had a wider variation and exhibited many contrasts, such as “significant differences between religious and non-re...
... middle of paper ...
...ity. I also wish to question these participants about the differences between forms of religious sub factors, such as spirituality and intrinsic qualities, in order to gain insight on their relation to sexual cognitions and behaviors. Lastly, I intend to ask questions concerning the relation between religious affiliations in sexual behaviors versus sexual cognitions. I am expecting generally reserved, yet informative answers due to the sensitive nature of the interview topic. I will find participants through a convenience sample, interviewing only those who are comfortable responding the questions.
Works Cited
Ahrold, Tierney K. Farmer, Melissa Trapnell, Paul D. Meston, Cindy M. “The Relationship
Among Sexual Attitudes, Sexual Fantasy, and Religiosity.” Archives of Sexual Behavior
40.3 (2011): 619-630. Web. 31 Jan. 2012.
In the article “An Anthropological Look at Human Sexuality” the authors, Patrick Gray and Linda Wolfe speak about how societies look at human sexuality. The core concept of anthology is the idea of culture, the systems of attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors people acquire as a member of society. The authors give an in depth analysis on how human sexuality is looked at in all different situations.
The essay by Peter J. Gomes, entitled �Homophobic? Read Your Bible,� can be analyzed in many ways. The essay discusses the issue of homosexuality as it relates to religion. The Baptist minister provides an unexpected approach to the subject. Mr. Gomes�s thesis statement in this essay is, �The army of the discontented, eager for clear villains and simple solutions and ready for a crusade in which political self-interest and social anxiety can be cloaked in morality, has found hatred of homosexuality to be the last respectable prejudice of the century� (�Homophobic� 414). This essay uses effective evidence to prove the thesis statement while also doing a good job of refuting opposing views.
Over the past couple centuries that the United States has existed, society has always had a judgement to make on one’s sexuality. At the head of society has consistently been white, Christian, hetereosexual males; therefore, they had the power to define sexual and societal norms. As a result, judgements on one’s sexuality have always intersected with one’s race, class or gender, groups of people that are not dominating society.
India has a reputation for being a very “sexually tolerant society”(Nanda 1999:49) . The reason for this is the roles that Hijra play in Hindu religion but also because Islam and Hinduism are both sexually positive. This means that both of these religions have a particularly wide range of sexual expression and acceptance compared different to western cultures(Nanda 1999:50). More specifically for Hinduism, “humans achieve their goals-salvation, bliss, knowledge and (sexual) pleasure”(Nanda 1999:50). This is different from western cultures because many westerners view sexual expression in very strict categories and contractions to these categories causes discomfort to certain people. Hinduism allows for more options in sexual expression which allows for “celebrating the idea that universe is boundlessly various, and that all possibilities may exist without excluding each other”(Nanda 1999:53). Indian people are very tolerable, embrace social exceptions, and endless different personalities to the point where Hijra are
Milstein, Susan A. Taking Sides Clashing Views in Human Sexuality. Ed. William J. Taverner and Ryan W. McKee. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009. Print.
Sexuality is a fundamental part of our self-discovery, involving much more than just being genetically or anatomically male and female and it is not defined solely by one 's sexual acts (Ministry of Education 1989, p.79 cited in Gourlay, P 1995). The notion that sexuality is fixed and innate disregards the social aspects that impact ones’ sexualities. Gagnon and Simon (1973) further commented that sexuality is a feature of social
The beginning of this short research essay began with the author explaining what the essay will be about. This essay primarily focuses on the differences and similarities of sexuality between men, women, gays, and lesbians. It also focuses on time, because throughout time, human sexuality has changed. New scientific evidence has also helped give new insight to the human mind and their most basic needs.
By doing this research, I am hoping to fill a gap in current research and to show a relationship between an individual’s current activity and preference and their perception of other people’s to be similar to their own. It will also help to show that some previously atypical sexual behaviors may be more commonly practiced than previously thought which would allow some to breathe easier about not being “deviant.”
...orliti, John E.. Reverence for life and family II: valuing values : a guide for parents of teens : sexuality education in the Catholic tradition. Dubuque, Iowa: Religious Education Division, Wm. C. Brown Co. Publishers, 1986. Print.
Like many people in our time, Christians are studying and discussing issues related to human sexuality over many years. What is God’s view of sexuality? How are the pressures from a broader culture and the development of technology affecting God’s role in regards to human sexuality in tomorrow 's society?
The sexual orientation of a person has been a critical debate over the past several centuries. For several...
“Sex and religion? Those two don’t really go hand in hand,” commented by a freshmen student from UF. Like this student, numerous people around the world believe this misconception to be true. Whether people argue for or against the importance of sex in religion, more than just what goes on the bedroom has been heating up lately. Many debates have sparked due to the negative connotation associated with sex when confronted about its position in religious cultures. A study done had proven a direct relationship between religiosity and sexual attitudes in college student, but to what extent are their spiritual values influential in their sexual beliefs and what are the reasons behind this (Beckwith, n.pg.). Either way, there is to some extent an influence on sexual behavior, whether it is by gender, ethnicity, or religion. After extensive research and several interviews, I’m determined to find the truth about sex and its importance in religious cultures, its effects on spirituality, and the roles it plays in religion.
The American Psychiatric Association does not define atypical sexual interests as a disorder unless it causes personal distress, causes another person psychological or physical injury, or involves a person unwilling or unable to give legal consent. These distinctions were made to show that individuals who engage in atypical sexual behavior must not be inappropriately labeled as having a mental disorder. When we think of sexual orientation, we usually think of the continuum of gay, straight, and bisexual, but sexual orientation is a deep-seated attraction toward a certain kind of person. Erotic desire includes attention, attraction, fantasy, thoughts, urges, genital arousal, and behavior. It is further complicated by variations of dominance or submission, sadism and masochism, fetishes, and consent or no consent. These interests may be single or multiple, exclusive or nonexclusive, idiosyncratic or opportunistic, stable or fluid. Possible legal consequences, lack of opportunity, and unwillingness or inability to act all work to constrain our behavior. The sooner we learn this concerning human sexual behavior, the sooner we shall reach a sound understanding of the realities of sex. The reasons for our sexual choices are analyzed obsessively, imposing an undue emphasis on categorization rather than accepting the great diversity of same-sex attractions. But the act of categorizing all of these atypical sexual attractions does not mean that acting on them is either legal or morally acceptable nor unacceptable. Explanations for all of the elements of our sexual attractions are complex and probably unknowable. All research runs the risk of reductionism, but when research on sexuality focuses exclusively on genital sexual activity --to the exclusion of considerations of attraction, affection and affiliation--it falls short in understanding our
There is constantly cessation why women and men cohabitate, nurture, desire, and endure. Many shrug the similarities and differences to the side due to the complex nature that is involved in understanding the progression. Since the beginning of time, according to the bible, man was placed as the dominant sex, fending for the families well being. The woman has tended to the important jobs around the homestead as situations arose. Often in society, one will find himself in a battle depending on the views of the receiving recipients. Following is a dialogue explaining a safe and metro sexual view as a general whole.
A fundamental step for understanding the links between human nature and intimate relationships is by understanding human sexuality. Alfred Kinsey, in his pioneering study on human sexual behaviour, illustrated the degree to which individuals differ in their sexual attitudes, beliefs and preferences (Kinsey, Pomeroy & Martin, 1948). In particular, a marked difference was highlighted in individuals’ sociosexual attitudes and behaviours. Following this, many of the sociosexual features individuals differ in, including preferred frequency of sexual intercourse, the number of different sexual partners they predict to have in the future, and their willingness to engage in uncommitted relationships, have shown to covary (Eysenk, 1976, as cited in Barnes, Malamuth & Check, 1984). Considered together, these features compose an individual difference dimension named sociosexuality (Snyder, Simpson & Gangestad, 1986). Sociosexuality reflects the tendency to engage in uncommitted, casual sexual encounters (Simpson & Gangestad, 1991). Those with a restricted sociosexual orientation typically prefer closeness and commitment from their romantic partner before engaging in sex (Simpson & Gangestad, 1991). Such individuals claim they rarely have one-night stands, and require emotional intimacy within a romantic relationship before feeling comfortable with sex (Simpson & Gangestad, 1991). Conversely, unrestricted individuals require little or no emotional bond with a partner in order to have sex. These individuals are more likely to be involved in extra-marital relationships (Seal, Agostinelli & Hannett, 1994), and exhibit more frequent displays of sexual assertiveness such as flirting (Simpson, Gangestad & Nations, 1996).