Relationship of Walcott's Poetry with History

1061 Words3 Pages

Discuss the relationship Walcott’s Poetry has with History. How is this demonstrated in his poetry? ‘I have Dutch, nigger and English in me, and either I am nobody, or I am a nation.’ This is a quote from ‘Shabine’, a Walcott persona. A central theme that runs through Walcott’s poetry is his search for identity. In many of his poems he focuses on an internal dissonance between established cultural heritage in his African, English and Caribbean ancestry in developing one that encompasses each one without disregarding another. He appears to be in constant pursuit of a feeling of atonement; one it seems he can only gain from returning to his pre-slave trade ancestors. Walcott also refers to the past so he can begin to understand and justify the context in which these events happen. ‘A Far Cry from Africa’ is one of Walcott’s poems that explore his feeling of identity where he explores how and if he can incorporate both African and English elements of his ancestry without feeling he has deserted either. Walcott experiences, what has been described as, ‘cultural schizophrenia’ when he explores his cultural roots. ‘The gorilla wrestles with the superman. I who am poisoned with the blood of both, where shall I turn, divided to the vein?’ His use of ‘poisoned with the blood of both’ suggests that he sees neither African or English heritage any better than the other and each representing polar opposite qualities, ‘gorilla’, being pure natural instinct, ‘superman’, signifying a superior intelligence and a kind of ‘mind over body’ mentality. The gorilla and superman wrestling could be taken in two different ways; Walcott verbalising his inner conflict, or he could be referring to the European colonisation of Africa in the late ninetee... ... middle of paper ... ...s taken with us after the fall, ‘which makes everyone guilty, or eve innocent.’ Eve is innocent because she did not know the consequences of her actions, but people today know that it is bad to betray gods law therefore making ‘everyone guilty’. This is perhaps Walcott’s attempt at justifying his promiscuous love of women; creating temptation as something unavoidable and innate within each of us or love as something that is above all rule. Walcott regularly refers to classical, biblical and slave trade history to justify previous events, gain a feeling of belonging and self from his heritage and to express his behaviour in ways people are already familiar with. His personal history is something he carries with him using it to create a sense of his own identity around it although he seems to harbour a huge amount of inner conflict in his contradictory heritage.

Open Document