Preview
Preview

The Relationship Between Various Contextual Factors and Its Effect on Political Conversation and Participation

:: 19 Works Cited
Length: 1654 words (4.7 double-spaced pages)
Rating: Blue      
Open Document
Need writing help? Check your paper »



- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Many communication theories, as well as various disciplines of social science, have investigated the multifaceted relationship between various communicative involvement and political or civic participation in light of deliberative democracies. As Delli Carpini and his colleagues (Delli Carpini, Cook, & Jacobs, 2004, p. 316) note, “At least one tradition within democratic theory has long designated public deliberation as a cornerstone of participatory democracy and representative government.” Here, public deliberation largely means various forms of everyday political conversation⎯“By ‘political conversation’ we mean all kinds of political talk, discussion, or argument as long as they are voluntarily carried out by free citizens without any specific purpose or predetermined agenda” (Kim, Wyatt, & Katz, 1999, p. 362). Numerous studies point to the fact that everyday political conversation has significant impacts on public life. Political conversation enhances political knowledge (Cappella, Price, & Nir, 2002; Eveland & Hively, 2009; Eveland et al., 2005; Kim et al., 1999), quality of opinion (Kim & Kim, 2008; Kim et al., 1999), and issue elaboration or reflection (Mcleod, Scheufele, & Moy, 1999; Cho et al., 2009). Furthermore, political conversation also contribute individuals’ political tolerance and social trust (Huckfeldt, Johnson, & Sprague, 2004), community involvement (Kim & Ball-Rokeach, 2006), and ultimately, political participation (Cho at al., 2009; Delli Carpini et al., 2004; Rojas, Shah, & Friedland, 2011; Shah et al., 2005; Wyatt, Katz, & Kim, 2000). In essence, “political conversation is indeed the heart of deliberative democracy” (Kim et al., 1999, p. 380).
Political conversations and civic participations ...


... middle of paper ...


.... V., & Friedland, L. A. (2011). A communicative approach to social capital. Journal of Communication, 61, 689-712.
Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32, 531-565.
Shah, D. V., Mcleod, J. M., & Yoon, S. (2001). Communication, context, and community: An exploration of print, broadcast, and Internet influences. Communication Research, 28, 464-506.
Slater, M. D., Snyder, L., & Hayes, A. F. (2006). Thinking and modeling at multiple levels: The potential contribution of multilevel modeling to communication theory and research. Human Communication Research, 32, 375-384.
Wyatt, R., Katz, E., & Kim, J. (2000). Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of Communication, 50, 71-92.


Click the button above to view the complete essay, speech, term paper, or research paper

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »







This essay is 100% guaranteed.