Comparing Rape Of The Lock 'And Tam O' Shanter

1376 Words3 Pages

In this essay I will look at The Rape of the Lock by Alexander Pope and 'Tam o' Shanter' by Robert Burns, and conclude if they have genuine morals and if so what are they and how do they compare to each other.
The Rape of the Lock in an overview seems to paint a picture of human vanity and the rituals of courtship. The poem appears to have a light almost trivial subject- the unwanted cutting of a woman's hair, however the fashionable/upper class world sees this as serious. In more of a detailed reading the poem also portrays the relationship between men and women, in particular with how they are more concerned with social status, physical beauty and material values as opposed to their morality and character.
This is shown by the character …show more content…

Therefore I would suggest that the moralising in The Rape of the Lock is serious in the sense that throughout it there is a continuous comparison between the significant and insignificant things, and Pope exploits the differences by employing the devices of a mock …show more content…

However the narrator plays a significant role and also suggests that the poem is merely to entertain in the sense that the narrator tends to keep the status quo. He seems to side with Tam, but he also expresses sympathy to the women “ a gentle dames it gars me greet/ to think how mone counsels sweet/ how monie lengthened sage advices/ the husband frae the wife despises”.9 This in itself shows that the poem is accessible for women and men, and it is involving the women and inviting them to see the funny side of this tale. The narrator and Tam and his friends seem to be celebrating male bonding, they all like drinking and they generally see women as inferior.
The mock heroic aspect of this poem seems to suggest that Burns in a light hearted way is mocking Tam and his views on women, however he also seems to sympathise with Tam. This would suggest that Tam is more of a lovable rogue that we all know and love and the narrator is not chastising him or moralising to him he is merely giving him a word of

Open Document