I am sick of racism. Creating divisions among people using a false differentiations among groups of humans is a tool for controlling people (divide and conquer), and in fact the division into races is false. Race is a synonym with “subspecies,” the differences among subspecies is a matter of location and genetic difference. A good example of races or subspecies among other animals can be found in the Northern brown bears.
The brown bears of Eurasia and North America are a single species; that is, they can produce fertile offspring, but they are called by different names because of the different areas where they live and different appearances; they are called Eurasian Brown Bears, North American Brown Bears, Alaskan Brown Bears, Kodiak Bears, Grizzly bears, and Polar Bears. In the wild there is little interaction among the various subspecies, and they probably are on the way to becoming different species, but in zoos they interact readily and mate whenever convenient, and they have fertile offspring. While humans are like brown bears in having groups that have minor differences in appearance, like the North American and the Eurasian subspecies of brown bears, humans travel around quite a bit.
It has been rare for significant groups of humans to remain isolated for a significant amount of time. Although there have been small groups on islands that may have been isolated from other humans for a very long time; it appears that migrating humans have interacted with other groups on a regular basis throughout the development of the human species. As a result there is no sign that any group of humans has been moving toward becoming a separate species, at least not for the last several thousand years.
There are some differenc...
... middle of paper ...
...f humans, the human race.
If you are a racist, a believer that there is more than one race of humans, then please do a little research into the matter before you tell me that that I’m a complete idiot for not believing that there are several races of humans, and please define the races for me. I have been trying to find out for years what the proper defining characteristics are, and no one has managed to create a consistent set of defining characteristics.
Works Cited
“85% of variation is within races, and only 15% between.”
https://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2009/05/genetic-distance-between-populations/#.UssT26yznvM
http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/003951.html
Non-existence of races
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2739576
Human Races: A Genetic and Evolutionary Perspective
http://www.realfuture.org/GIST/Readings/Templeton%281998%29.pdf
others into “races”. But what is race and does race exist? Can we distinguish one another heritage and ethnicity based on our physical characteristics? What is race? According to Steve Barkan, race is referred to a category of people who share certain inherited physical characteristics, such as skin color, facial features, and stature (Barkan 152). Most people think that race is a biological term, however, race is a social concept that has been around several hundred years. People use race to classify
The biological understanding of race in the United States is that people from different places have different genetics and genes in their body, accounting for different traits in each people. These people could be grouped together by their biological traits because their similarities in genes would make them look alike. People wanted to believe that there actually were true biological differences between people. Race in the past and present (somewhat) has been categorized based on continental origin
The concept of race is an ancient construction through which a single society models all of mankind around the ideal man. This idealism evolved from prejudice and ignorance of another culture and the inability to view another human as equal. The establishment of race and racism can be seen from as early as the Middle Ages through the present. The social construction of racism and the feeling of superiority to people of other ethnicities, have been distinguishably present in European societies as
According to Erasmus, (2008) race is a social construct. Erasmus continues to argue that race is not natural or not found in society. “Race is not given”. Race ideally was made by modern science. Race can be learned and unlearned over time. In the same way as Thornton would argue about culture not being real, but something that has been historically created, the same analysis can be made about race. In that case race challenges the stereotypes about it having any biological or cultural basis. Erasmus
When I think about race and ethnicity, they are used interchangeably, however it can be problematic because there is a distinction between these two. Race is considered a social construct because race has always been defined by the dominant group in society. Our society is progressing every day, however, we are still dealing with racial discrimination and inequality. Race is considered complex and race shapes the way that some people relate to each other, based on their belief that it reflects
Introduction Numerous scientific endeavours have sought to define 'races' as distinct biological entities. However, the act of categorising individuals into 'races' is inherently an act of classification. While physical traits are often associated with race, there exists no definitive consensus on the number of races or which specific physical attributes should define them. Skin colour is commonly presumed to be the primary determinant, yet other characteristics such as hair type and colour, eye
The concept of race and what it means to people today varies from place to place. Despite the increase in global contacts, scientists are skeptical about the concept of race as a social construction. There is an ongoing debate about what “race” actually means and how is it used in terms of categorizing people. As the biological variations increase, differences among people of the same groups are visible. Over time people began to show more and more similarities in different ways. Race is only used
imagination to the social construct of race yields insight into its fallacy and utility. This essay examines the historical origin, functions, and societal implications of race in the United States. I also connect the social construct of race with the writings of Barbara J. Fields, Kingsley Davis, Wilbert E. Moore, Marianne Bertrand, and Sendhil Mullainathan. In a larger context, the social construct of race is a system of schematic classification; race
you are a part of the African Diaspora, first, one must identify with the race that connects all the people of the Diaspora more so than their shared experiences or culture: the African race. In Racial Formations, Omi exhibits that in social interactions, “one of the first things we notice about people when we meet them (along with their sex) is their race. We utilize race to provide clues about who a person is” (Omi 87). Race is an extremely important part of not only identity, but also who we are
in developed countries during this time frame, it seemed that the idea of race and racism was still in practice. England, a prominent figure in imperialism and colonialism, perpetuated race and racism heavily within society. However, what was the motivation that fueled race conflict? Essentially, is race a legitimate concept or is it just a fabricated by societal ideals that favor one particular skin tone? I argue that race is merely this fabricated idea that was created through colonialism and power
Humans define race by how they conceive and categorize different social realities. Thus, race is often referred to as a social construct. The differences in skin color and facial characteristics have led most of society to classify humans into groups instead of individuals. These constructs affect us all, and they often result in situations where majority racial groups cause undue suffering to those that are part of the minority. The understanding of race as a social construct is best illustrated
both race and gender. People are both categorized and judged based off ethnic backgrounds, gender, and numerous other meaningless factorials. This illogical means of defining people is degrading and unconducive as one should be judged by the content of their character because it is the actions derived from the standards they uphold themselves to that defines a person. Unjust limitations are composed irrationally
the course of time, it is crucial to look at the social construct of our world, which we depend on to create a working economy, and to construct a life where people can depend on brethren, and have a place of worship where people where there is amity, persons need to fathom what respect towards racial identity is, so that there is not a complete forfeiture. Promptly, it is time to look at what citizens are speaking about persons from other races, and strike out a strong statement against the outrageous
Since 1619, when the first slaves were brought to North America, race has played an important role in everyone’s life; especially those who are different from what people would consider “American”. According to the textbook, “race is defined as any group of people united or classified together on the basis of common history, nationality, or geographical distribution” (pg. 59). People are placed into different categories instead of all being considered human beings. Although we do not have slavery
this is called social construction. The definition of a social construct says it is “a social mechanism, phenomenon, or category created and developed by society; a perception of an individual, group, or idea that is ‘constructed’ through cultural or social practice” (Social Construct). The idea that everyone is in their own category based on their opinion over certain issues can have a positive or a negative effect on society. In todays world, there are three social constructs that are in a sense