Quality Executive Holloware

1642 Words4 Pages

Question 1: It is well known that quality has many dimensions and definitions. It can be based on a transcendent approach (innate excellence, for example a Rolls Royce), a manufacturing based approach (free of errors), a user based approach (fit for purpose), a product based approach (conforms to measurable characteristics) or a value based approach (suitable cost and price). Since Executive Holloware has a strong brand that suggests top quality the delivery of consistent excellent quality should be priority for this company. Quality for Executive Holloware could be specified could be defined as consistent performance to customers’ expectations. More specifically you could specify quality at Holloware as producing 95% of all products in such a manner that they do not need to be reworked by any department due to shape defects, scratches, bruises or discolouring. Judging from the random sample that Paul has taken it seems that the majority of defects originate from the press shop. The causes for this phenomenon might be: Too little inspection points during production – Defects are only picked up at the end of the process where costs were already incurred on defective products. The remuneration policy of the workers does not promote the production of quality products. It seems that the workers get paid per product produced, whether it complies with quality standards or not. There seems to be a communication problem between the various departments. They work in silos without integrating the process. There is a lack of well defined quality standards. As Jim remarked he does not know when something is a scratch or not. There is no yield Key Performance Indicator (KPI) in place that measures % prime product on first pa... ... middle of paper ... ... call lengths to such an extent that Duncan is suggesting might result in declining quality of customer service and the loss of potential sales due to perceived abruptness from the customers perspective. It is the author’s opinion the Key Performance Indicator (KPI) of call length only might be short sighted. It might encourage employees to rush calls. A more comprehensive measurement system for employees might be considered for example, call length coupled to sales dollars per call length and customer satisfaction according to a survey conducted by AEB mortgage’s marketing department. However, if Duncan remains adamant in reducing call duration and call length variability he might consider managing by exception. He should identify the persons who consistently take longer on calls, establish why this phenomenon exists and act accordingly with training or the like.

More about Quality Executive Holloware

Open Document