Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Environmental impacts of cattle farming
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Environmental impacts of cattle farming
Public Lands vs. Feedlot Feeding Grazing has always been a key element in beef production. Today there are hundreds of controversies and issues relating to feedlot feeding and public land grazing. How these concerns can be managed are seen and viewed by many different people with various methods. However, in the meantime, this nation wide problem will continue to affect thousands in numerous, dissimilar ways. Virtually all problems associated with grazing are due to the continuous presence of cattle on the same land for an extended period of time. This is true whether the land is public or private. As soon as time control becomes a factor in management, grazing becomes a positive factor in the environment. Previous studies have found that feedlot feeding and management can be extremely harmful to the animals associated with such practices. Many concerns include the well being of the animals living in such a space that is incredibly overcrowded with limited movement, lack of fresh air, disease is constantly at a higher level, and temperature control has no limit. There are over 1000 animals’ confined to a single building, causing problems with the animals to eating behaviors as well as making it difficult for the creatures to lie down. The CAFOs (Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations) are like factories, however they differ due to the fact that they contain tons of helpless animals living within their walls. One cow produces more than 20 times the waste a human produces. Waste from 10,000 CAFO cows in such limited areas contributes to untreatable waste of a city populated with more than 200,000 people. The manure from these animals is usually used as a valuable fertilizer but when it is liquefied, the waste instantly pollutes, contaminates and poisons most everything it comes into contact with. The nitrogen in the manure is very toxic to humans and pollutes the ground water. Furthermore the air quality is severely damaging humans and animals of the surrounding area. There is an unvarying amount of dust, odors, flies, and noxious gases that are daily produced and generated from CAFOs. These odors can cause many health problems for the workers and the people that confined to these working units within the feedlots. Though few, some see these confined feedlots as advantages to cattle management simply because there are more animals in a condensed area so as to preserve additional open land along with supplying various job openings within the CAFOs.
In today's society, organic food is a giant new thing in which food is produced without any chemicals. In other words, the product must be 100 percent natural. A major food source of the American people is meat, and the way that it is produced today is a major issue. In feedlots, where cattle are fed grain to grow before being slaughtered, the conditions are terrible and horrifying. Cattle are confined to a limited amount of space and not allowed to roam freely. Also in these cattle growing yards, the risk of disease is much higher in these animals than out on the open range grazing on the grass. Beef critics say that there are no cattle breeds that posses the amounts of marbling present to make a good steak. It is a true statement to say that these critics are very indeed wrong. Also, Many people also do not know that that the meat from cattle that are fed grain, is high in fat content and has too much marbling. Grass-fed beef is much leaner than grain-fed beef, has less fats, and is produced all naturally. Therefore, grass-fed beef is much healthier and safer to eat than grain-fed beef.
Joel Salatin is a 57 year old farmer who has been farming full time since 1982 on his farm “Polyface” which is located in Swoope, VA, where he is somewhat of a local legend in farming. “The farm services more than 5,000 families, 10 retail outlets, and 50 restaurants through on-farm sales and metropolitan buying clubs with salad bar beef, pastured poultry, eggmobile eggs, pigaerator pork, forage-based rabbits, pastured turkey and forestry products using relationship marketing” (Salatin, Polyface.com). Mr. Salatin utilizes a unique method of farming, a fact which makes him so profoundly interesting. The style in which he farms his land is termed “mob grazing”. Mob grazing is the process in which different animals are rotated at different times throughout the farms’ fields. He is an advocate not just for the human well being but for the world’s ecological sustainability and the continuance of growth.
... 80%. This solution, however, is considered too expensive and impractical to the cattle industry, and as a result is going unrecognized (Pollan 82). The food system is more concerned with profit, production, and efficiency, and this is why very little has changed in the last few decades. Although profit is a validly arguable for many people, the means in which to gain a high profit has become extremely unethical and hazardous to the general populations health.
Some of the main misconceptions about feedlot cattle is that they are one of the leading causes of greenhouse gases. Greenhouse gases are among the main causes of global warming and many don’t know a lot about cattle or global warming in general and are quick to find something to blame even with sufficient information to support it. We need the cattle industry for most of everyday needs not just meat and feedlots are the only efficient option to fill our needs. Although cattle produce methane, they aren’t a large contributor of greenhouse gasses. Feedlot cattle produce less greenhouse emissions than grass fed/organic cattle, and feedlots work to reduce methane emissions.
The feedlot animals release tremendous amount of methane in the atmosphere which is a major cause of global warming. According to Pollan, “Today the most serious environmental harm associated with the cattle industry takes place on the feedlot” (70). All feedlots animals are mostly raised and spend all their life in small shed eating corn all day. There is no proper hygiene followed, the cows are mistreated and dragged to the slaughter house because they become sick eating corn, which is indigestible. The cost of processed meat is cheap as these animals eat corn which is produced below cost and are injected with artificial hormones and antibiotics for rapid growth.
The differences between conventional and grass-fed beef clearly indicate which beef is a better option. Conventional cattle are crowded into feedlots where each cow is confined and is covered in their own manure. Conventional cattle are also fed corn and soybeans which can cause ulcers and promote an overgrowth of Clostridium perfringens. Antibiotics and hormones are also given to conventional cattle to promote growth and prevent disease. Grass- fed cattle
The cattle industry produces vast amounts of strain in the environment. It is energy inefficient, pollutes water, occupies many acres of land, and deteriorates the health of the people who abuse its consumption. The government subsidizes this industry. Therefore, the price paid for meat doesn’t reflect the environmental hazards involved in the process. In order to protect our health and the health of the environment we should pay close attention to our food choices and make sure we don’t support industries that degrade it.
You have to learn a lot of knowledge from trial and error, because everyone in the beef industry does things differently. There are two different sides of the beef industry. There is the cow-calf operations and the commercial, or “background” operations. On cow-calf operations, the owner of the farm breeds his cows and raises the calves until they are weaned from their mothers and ready to sell. The commercial operation usually purchase the calves at auction(Kramer, 2017).
Although some may claim that this utilizes less land to produce a unit of meat, eggs, or milk than naturally-raised farms, this kind of treatment is not right and should not continue to be instituted. Livestock is deprived of exercise so that every ounce of energy in their bodies is devoted towards producing items for human consumption.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Such products include vaccines, medications, and antibiotics to support healthy and consistent herds of beef producing cattle. It segments the market into three distinct categories. Hobbyists herd less than 100 cows; Traditionalists commonly carry between 100 to 499, and businesses are working with 500 or more. (Mohr, 1999) Time spent in the field with the ranchers was allocated based on the volume of product purchased by each individual.
The issue here is that the grains will have been grown with the assistance of fertilizers, chemical pesticides, and genetically modified ingredients, meaning that the grains contain unhealthy additives and offer virtually no nutrition at all. Add to this, the fact that cows that are fed with grains, are far more likely to be injected with hormones, and the meat itself all of a sudden becomes far less healthy and appealing. Grass-fed beef, however, comes from cows that are allowed to graze on lush green, natural grass in wild pastures, meaning that the cows are happier, they get more exercise, and they consume healthy and natural ingredients, which only adds to the nutritional value of the meat. Grass-fed beef is a great source of healthy saturated fats, plus, the meat is rich in B vitamins and minerals such as Zinc and Iron, which help boost testosterone levels. Add to this, the fact that the beef is a great source of protein and amino acids, and people, especially those trying to bulk up and burn fat, will benefit
Most cow lovers need not worry about any of this. Their cows have become welcome household pets. They have put down their steak knives and decided to dine with them, not on them. Such docile animals have now become a part of the family, and owning but a few cows has eased the problem of naming a vast herd of cattle.
The calves that come into a feedlot come from different parts of Texas, United States, and the World. According to Barham and Troxel (2007), the southeastern region of the United States contains around fifty-three percent of the country’s beef cattle operations. Most of the cattle operations in this region have less than fifty beef cows and most of these cattle operations sell their cattle in a livestock auction to make their profit. Also the feedlots the cattle are taken too, differ as in how they are set up and operated.
The profit of cattle production is based on feed intake and its use efficiency by animals. Beef cattle production is majorly suitable in grazing system because it needs lower nutrients than dairy cattle. However, the knowledge on matching feed supply and nutrient need of cattle on pastures is complex because cattle collect a diversity of feeds. The study on feed intake and factors influencing on it is important to make sure the maximum intake of cattle. As grasses and legumes are the main feeds in grazing system, its fibre and cell wall contents affect definitely on the digestion of animal, resulting the variation in amount of feed consumed. The supplementation of concentrated feeds may restrict the feed consumption because high level of starch may affect microbial activity in rumen. Reversely, the feed intake of grazing cattle can be improved if best amount of supplementation is given. Otherwise, physical and physiological factors of animal also play important role to determine the feed consumption of cattle, for instance, the difference of feed intake between fat and thin cattle, pregnant and non-pregnant cows or lactating and non-lactating cows. Lastly, the most critical factor that affects the consumption of feeds of grazing beef cattle is the environmental traits which are characteristics of pasture, temperature and parasitic diseases. These factors partly and totally influence the other two factors above.
I will be generally addressing environmental concerns as well as animal abuse. Egg, milk, flour, sugar, and butter and ingredients that are always used to make cupcakes. Synthetic fertilisers provide for 40% of all the nitrogen used by crops all around the world [1], if this were to be replaced by animal manure the increase in global cattle herds would have to escalate from 1 billion to 7 billion [1]. There is no simple solution that is environmentally suitable but it is necessary to cut the use of these chemicals because all the companies are using it. Not only is the cattle population expanding but the human population’s growth is continuing, it is set to be higher than 9 billion in 2050 which deems necessary to grow a lot more food on the same land area [1]. Places li...