The new concept of producer companies
TILL RECENTLY, the Companies Act, 1956 (the Act), recognized only three types of companies, namely, companies limited by shares (sub-divided into public limited and private limited companies), companies limited by guarantees and unlimited companies. With the coming into force on February 6 of the Companies (Amendment) Act 2002, (1 of 2003), a fourth category, `producer companies,' finds a place in the Act.
For this, a new Part IXA, divided into 12 chapters, has been included in the Act, comprising 46 sections, interestingly numbered as 581A to 581Z and 581ZA to 581ZT. However, the section that defines the various types of companies that can be incorporated under the Act remains unaltered.
The new concept
…show more content…
The members have necessarily to be `primary producers,' that is, persons engaged in an activity connected with, or related to, primary produce.
What is primary produce? In terms of the Act it is a produce of farmers arising from agriculture including animal husbandry, horticulture, floriculture, pisciculture, viticulture, forestry, forest products, re-vegetation, bee raising and farming plantation products: produce of persons engaged in handloom, handicraft and other cottage industries: by - products of such products; and products arising out of ancillary industries.
The 46 new sections respectively deal with incorporation of producer companies: their management; general meetings; share capital and members rights; finance, accounts and audit; loan to members and investments; penalties; amalgamation, merger or division; resolution of disputes; and reconversion of producer company to inter-State cooperative society. A few salient features are now briefly
…show more content…
The Act has not so far made it compulsory for limited companies to carry out internal audit, although listed companies, by virtue of the clause in the listing agreement relating to corporate governance, are to have a full-scale internal audit system.
Resolution of disputes
Any dispute relating to the formation, management or business of producers companies is to be settled by conciliation or by arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as if the parties to the dispute have consented in writing to such procedure. The arbitrator's decision shall be final. This seems to be inequitable since usually an arbitration award can be appealed against in high courts.
Inter-State cooperative societies
With objects not confined to one State may make an application to the Registrar for recognition as producer companies. The statute also provides for reconversion of such producer companies to their former status as inter-State cooperative societies subject to the approval of High
AICPA Audit Procedures for Agricultural Producers Pt.1 Ch5.02 ?Growing crops and developing animals to be held for sale should be valued at the lower of cost or market.?
RNRA Team, “Supermarkets, Fresh Produce and New Commodity Chains: What Future for the Small Producer?” Hot Topics: February, 2004.
The Forja auto plant lies dormant after Menem’s crucial choices. The employees take action and form a new movement of workers who are occupying their own bankrupt businesses, which create jobs for the recently unemployed. Freddy Espinoza the president of La Forja joined with co-workers in hopes of bringing their factory back to life without a boss making all the decisions. The worker’s plan was to have a democratic organization where everyone votes on all decisions, not just one person making the choices. Their biggest inspiration on the movement was the Zanon Ceramics factory. The factory has been worker controlled for just over two years at this time, and succeeded in everything they had strived for. Just like Zanon becoming a successful cooperative business, some Canadian cooperative businesses have become very successful and well known. Agropur, a dairy company providing their products to name-bran yogurts and ice cream companies, is a very successful cooperative business. Even though Canada is mostly a neoliberalism country, abiding by the rules of having...
It is proper to present a business definition of merger as it found on legal reference with the ultimate goal in the pursuing of an explanation on which this paper intents to present. A merger in accordance with the textbook is legally defined as a contractual and statuary process in which the (surviving corporation) acquires all the assets and liabilities of another corporation (the merged corporation). The definition go even farther to involve and clarify about what happen to shares by explaining the following; “the shareholders of the merged corporation either are paid for their share or receive the shares of the surviving corporation”. But in simple terms is my attempt to define as the product or birth of a corporation on which typically extends its operation by combining with another corporation. So from two on existence corporations in the process it gets absorbed into becomes one entity. The legal definition also implied more than meet the eye. The terms contractual and statuary, it implied a process on which contracts and statuary measures emerge as measures to regulate, standardized, governing or simply at times may complicate whole process. These terms provide an explicit umbrella and it becomes as part of the agreement formulating or promoting a case for contracts to be precedent, enforced or regulated in a now or in the future under a court of law under the Contract Business Law Statue of Practice. As for what happens to the shares of the involved corporations no more explanation is needed as the already actions mentioned clearly stated of the expectations of a merge’s share involvement.
A business partnership is associations between two to twenty persons called partners who are in business jointly whose aims are make investment return. Those persons can be individuals, companies or trusts. Each partner contributes capital, labour, belongings or expertise to the partnership. It is imperative that all members involved in the partnership formalize the relationship through a written agreement in order to avert future disputes. The agreement dictates the share of profits and losses. The associates are correspondingly liable for the amount overdue, on the business. Features of a partnership; it can be formed for an unknown time, every member is viewed as an agent of every other member of the partnership. Partner's private assets are attached to the business obligations, equality of shares or interest unless otherwise and ownership interest cannot be transferred without the consent of all the owners (Aronsohn, 1957 p 100).
Food incorporation sets new protocols that require the farmers to keep purchasing more on dept. As a result of loans and only $18,000 annually (Kenner) they are stuck in a hole that they can’t get out of. I find many things disturbing
The organization consists of cement manufacturing and importing, sugar manufacturing and refining, salt refining, flour and semolina milling, pasta manufacturing, noodle...
Ownership and control of production ; vertically integrated manufacturing operation to enable its constant introducing of new items and also ensure short lead time
When Woolly Ltd and Jumper Ltd conduct intragroup transactions, as separate legal entities these transactions are recorded as normal however, from the point of the group these transactions are internal and therefore are not recognized by external users, thus the transactions must be eliminated. Finally, non-controlling interest occurs when the parent owns less than 100% of the subsidiary, however this is not relevant to Woolly Ltd as ownership of Jumper Ltd is 100%. These steps are imperative in the consolidation worksheet, as they enable the proper addition of assets and liabilities and the determination of profit or loss and net tax effects. Directors need to be able to view the financial performance of the group in order to make relevant and informed decisions. In order to obtain this information, the correct procedures, as mentioned, must be followed to ensure that assets are not overstated and liabilities understated.
More recently, entrepreneurship has also been added as one of these factors. Understanding these is essential to understanding the two production functions which this WIKI article focuses on. (2) Land Understanding what is meant by land is relatively simple. This comprises all of the natural resources that a particular producer has at their disposal. Most often this means immediate natural resources, like oil or the property on which the production facility is located.
[7] Cavendish Lawcards Series (2002) Company Law (3rd edn), p.15 [8] [1976] 3 All ER 462, CA. [9] Griffin, S. (1996) Company Law Fundamental Principles (2nd edn), p.19 [10] [1990] Ch 433. [11] Lecture notes [12] Lecture notes [13] [1939] 4 All ER 116.
According to Corporation Act 2001 s124(1), it illustrates that ‘’A company has the legal capacity and powers of an individual both in and outside the jurisdiction” . As it were, company as a legal individual must be freely with all its capital contribution shall embrace liability for its legal actions and obligations of the company’s shareholders is limited to its investment to the company. This ‘separate legal entity’ principle was established in the case of Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1987] as company was held to have conducted the business as a legal person and separate from its members. It demonstrated that the debt of company is belonged to the company but not to the shareholders. Shareholders have only right to participate in managing but not in sharing the company property. Besides ,the Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd [1925] demonstrates that the distinction between the shareholders and company assets. It means that even Mr Macaura owned almost all the shares in the company, he had no insurable interest in the company’s asset. The other recent case is the Lee v Lee’s Air Farming Ltd [1961] which illustrates that the distinct legal entities between employee ad director allows Mr.Lee function in dual capacities. It resulted that the corporation can contract with the controlling member of the corporation.
A common form of incorporation clause is:“all the terms, conditions, clause and exceptions as per charterparty.” or “all the terms, conditions, liberties and exceptions of the charterparty are herein incorporated.” or “All the terms whatsoever of the said contract/charter expect the rate and payment of freight specified therein apply to and govern the rights of the parties concerned in this shipment.”
The term “suppliers” in this context refers to the farmers and producers in developing countries, often running small concerns with limited investment or capacity.
The office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement (ODCE, 2015), Ireland defines Corporate Governance as “the system, principles and process by which organisations are directed and controlled. The principles underlying corporate governance are based on conducting the business with integrity and fairness, being transparent with regard to all transactions, making all the necessary disclosures and decisions and complying with all the laws of the land”. It is the system for protecting and advancing the shareholder’s interest by setting strategic direction for the firm and achieving them by electing and monitoring the capable management (Solomon, 2010). It is the process of protecting the stakes of various parties that have their interest attached with a company (Fernando, 2009). Corporate governance is the procedure through which the management of the company is achieving the goals of various stake holders (Becht, Macro, Patrick and Alisa,