Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Regulation of the internet
Internet government regulation
Net neutrality easy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Regulation of the internet
Privacy & Ethics (Chapter 13 p. 528, 546) This doesn’t pertain to any one section or specific topic within chapter 13, as it is an example of an application of such privacy and ethics on a more global scale. The Internet has been humanity’s information dream and convoluted cesspool of crime over at least the past decade. This is primarily because the Internet is devoid of any rules and laws. Personally, the trade off of lawlessness for infinite freedom was never troubling, nor a thought in my mind. There was never a point where I felt it necessary to picket our government for an Internet constitution, even when someone stole my credit card numbers and purchased a new car on the Internet. Yet, the net neutrality debacle has given me pause to consider that maybe we really do need something in place to protect the sanctity of the net. Motivated by greed that is business, companies like Comcast seek to control the bandwidth we are permitted to use. This was brought about because of companies like Netflix, that offer large amounts of streaming that soaks up bandwidth, becoming popular. Now Comcast wants to be able to sell bandwidth, putting certain people at an advantage (but aren’t they already selling bandwidth as an internet provider?). Brazil, and what this article is about, has enacted a law that acts as an Internet Bill of Rights. The law restricts how much data companies can harvest from their consumers, while also preventing Internet providers from acting as a “toll road” by charging for bandwidth. It is my hope that the US will follow Brazil, especially in the case of net neutrality. As a web developer, my largest fear is that all the aspects that set apart good developers and bad will be trumped by who has a larger pur... ... middle of paper ... ...were never clarified (thankfully, I worked in isolation). I’ve seen new tools being brought to the table that overcomplicated very simple processes, all for the sake of being “hip” to what the new technologies are. The one thing that this article didn’t mention was methodologies such as scrum that can be your best friend or worst nightmare. I have to say the experience was highly educational, as it wasn’t all completely negative. It was this company’s flaws that made me appreciate what it is like to build a company from the ground up, and the valuable perspectives that can make or break a team. Disclaimer: This company will be successful, in my opinion, and my analysis is simply an application of the subject I picked. Kogekar, Herment. "Why IT projects really fail." CIO. 5 Dec. 2013. 28 Apr. 2014 .
The emergence of the Internet and the World Wide Web brought upon a medium of communication with a range of opportunities for the world. However, this medium is, in due course, subject to the control of a few major companies. The enigma of information flow is the central concern of net neutrality. Consumers, competition and network owners would benefit directly from the regulation of network neutrality because it would provide a positive impact to those parties as well as provide equality.
Prados, John. "The Perfect Failure." MHQ: The Quarterly Journal 19, no. 3 (Spring 2007): 82-92.
A recent and hotly debated topic among businesses, politicians, and internet users in the United States is that of net neutrality. With the rise of the internet over the past few decades, laws and regulations have struggled to keep up with the ever changing environment. As such, the problem of whether net neutrality should be enforced, and to what extent, has been a dividing issue. This problem has come into the public’s attention recently due to infringements and controversy surrounding policies by Internet Service Providers (ISPs). In the following paragraphs, I plan to first define the concept of net neutrality, related topics which are crucial for an informed ethical discussion of the topic, and also related cases in which net neutrality
Privacy has always been a key personal right for many people. People need that personal space or bubble to themselves that nobody else can penetrate. Especially with the way everything is heading today with the new technologies on the brink nobody has any alone time. It is becoming more and more of a hot topic to people. They want to know that their personal information stays personal, and out of reach of other people. With all the ways that people’s privacy can be breached they have a reason for being a little worried. Out of all these one of the bigger topics is internet privacy. What happens to all their information that is used and posted on the internet? The internet lacks security and legislation when it comes to email providers, search engines, and social networking sites. This has led some people to use private peer-to-peer communication networks such as Freenet and BitTorrent.
In recent years net neutrality has become a hotly debated topic. Canadian consumers have favored legislation protecting net neutrality and Canadian telecoms have sought to change the legislation. In this case, Canadian consumers have it wrong. Canada should strike down its legislation regulating how internet service providers behave and move to a more open market. The current legislation forces all Canadian internet service providers to treat all traffic equally. This stifles competition and reduces consumer options.
On the contrary, the general public may argue that net neutrality is unnecessary because government control and regulation of the internet will provide a safer environment for users. According to M.C. Riley, “ISPs —instead of users— chose that lawful content, applications and services can be exchanged, offered and utilized. Existing possible services might become largely inoperable, and new services might thank never get off the ground, particularly if they compete with services offered by network operators” (Cleland and Riley 22). In the absence of net neutrality, ISPs can control and regulate content on the Internet, resulting on certain services becoming inoperable. Government control and regulation of the internet has provided a safer environment
Former Vice President Al Gore addressed the topic of Internet privacy and pointed out that “privacy is a basic American value […] in the Information Age and in every age […] and it must be protected” (qtd. in Masci). Senior researcher David Masci states that the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights indirectly implies the right of privacy “when it prohibits what it terms ‘unreasonable’ search and seizure” (Masci 183, 184). Yet, the usage of Internet, the part of nearly everyone’s day life that has increased tremendously over the past two decades, does not have any laws that would protect the
Internet is a powerful tool that allows users to collaborate and interact with others all over the world conveniently and relatively safely. It has allowed education and trade to be accessed easily and quickly, but all these benefits do not come without very taxing costs. This is especially true when dealing with the likes of the Internet. Countries in the European Union and Asia have realized this and have taken action against the threat of net neutrality to protect their citizens, even at the cost of online privacy. Internet censorship is required to protect us from our opinions and vices. Every country should adopt Internet censorship and regulation since it improves society by reducing pornography, racism/prejudice, and online identity theft.
Abstract: This paper examines the use of Internet technologies (specifically SafeWeb.com) to counteract invasions of personal privacy and censorship. The paper begins by exploring the methods by which governments, corporations, and commercial agents invade personal privacy. It also discusses Internet censorship on the corporate and governmental levels. It then proceeds to discuss SafeWeb.com, a technology that allows Internet users to surf the Web privately and view censored content. The paper finishes by exploring some of the ethical issues raised by Internet privacy and censorship in specific relation to SafeWeb, concluding that the application of SafeWeb in circumventing the authority of governments and corporations is inherently unethical.
The government gives each American citizen a set of unalienable rights that protect them from the government’s power. These rights cannot be broken, yet the government violates the Fourth Amendment daily to find ways to spy on the American public under the guise of protecting against terrorism. In 2007 President Obama said the American administration “acts like violating civil liberties is the way to enhance our securities – it is not.” Americans need to understand that their privacy is worth the fight. The people need to tell their neighbors, their congressmen, and their senators that they will not allow their internet privacy to be violated by needless spying. American citizens deserve the rights given to them and need to fight for the right to keep them by changing privacy laws to include Internet privacy.
Schmidt, E. E., & Cohen, J. (2014, March 11). The Future of Internet Freedom. Retrieved September 26, 2017, from
The invention of the internet has been one of the major advances of the modern world. It has allowed people from all over the globe to communicate with each other and ideas to be shared. In addition to this it is a free platform. Unlike television and radio it doesn’t cost anything to put your idea on the internet, making it a base of personal expression. This freedom coupled with the global access attracts around a billion users worldwide. Unfortunately, just as easily as the information is produced it is abused. The internet, although mostly used appropriately does harbour all manner of illegal activities. These range from phishing scams, trying to steal someone’s personal details, viruses, malicious code that attacks a person’s computer and websites that are morally questionable or illegal under Australian law. To combat this, the Rudd government has started action to impose an internet service provider level internet filter. An internet service provider is any company that provides internet services to its customers. Most notable of these is Telstra which is one of the top internet service providers in Australia. This filter will prevent a list of websites, the blacklist, from being accessed in Australia. In theory this is an excellent plan, but in reality, once implemented it will have little effect on preventing the illegal activity which occurs on the internet. The major arguments against the proposed filter are, cost of the filter, the ineffectiveness of the filter to stop illegal activity and the possibility of the blacklist expanding to block anti-government websites.
With media communication on the rise, it is important for humans to remember the basic respect levels that come with both media and face to face communication. In my opinion, media communication requires the same amount of respect as face to face communication. If a person is unable to confront or criticise a person face to face, they should not be able to do it in a media conversation. In my experiences, I have found it much easier to deal with confrontation over a phone, but I also find that some of the rudest comments I have made are over text. In many cases, I would rather have an argument over texting than face to face. Along with some cases where it is easier to be rude on media conversations, certain times, I have found myself saying better
Public discussions and debates on the implementation of the law, are required to hear the voice of the internet users and critical issues of technology, law and
4. Unknown. Ethics. Santa Clara University Markkula Center for Applied Ethics. 29th March 2004. http://cseserv.engr.scu.edu/NQuinn/COEN288/EngrHandbook_Ethics.pdf