Themes of Slaughterhouse 5 by Kurt vonnegut and Catch 22 by Joseph Heller

1423 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: mental and physical effects of war

Themes of Slaughterhouse 5 by Kurt vonnegut and Catch 22 by Joseph Heller

In the books, Slaughter House 5 by Kurt Vonnegut and Catch 22 by Joseph Heller there

are many themes that at first don’t appear to be related but once given a closer look have

striking similarities. Both books are about one mans experience through World War II,

one being a fighter pilot and another being a soldier. Each man is known as an anti-war

hero. They do not agree with the war and do not find it appropriate to fight for it.

Neither of the two men was the average “John Wayne” war hero that fights and dies for

his country. This is what makes these two books stand out from other war books. Both

of these books also were used during the Vietnam War as anti-war books denouncing the

war.

One major theme that comes up in both of these books is the theme of no free will.

In Slaughterhouse 5 Vonnegut proclaims through the narrator that there is no such thing

as free will and that all things in life are predestined. That no matter what we chose to do

we really aren’t choosing to do it at all and that the choice was already made. In Catch 22

the theme is the same just brought to our attention in a different way. Catch 22 is a

paradox, leaving no way of escaping from a dilemma. No matter what we do or say we

can’t escape it thus leaving us with no free will. Catch 22 is best described in the book

when Yossarian states, You don’t have to fly anymore missions if you’re crazy, but you

have to ask first and if you ask than you’re not crazy because anyone that wants to get out

of combat is not crazy (Heller 46). The utter simplicity of this “catch” at one-point makes

Yossarian let out a whistle. So in essence both of these characters are plagued with the

fact that they have no free will. Billy Pilgrim because everything in life is predestined so

he has no say in what goes on and Yossarian because he has to keep flying more missions

because of Catch 22.

Another major theme that comes across in these books is the anti-war hero. Both

main characters are the exact opposite of what we would consider war heroes. Yossarian

has no intention of laying down his life for his country and thinks anyone that would is

utterly stupid. He many times in the book tries to get out of flying more missions by

admitting himself to the hospital although he is not sick and ...

... middle of paper ...

...how the

ridiculousness of war. They were written to share with everybody that sometimes it isn’t

the soldier who kills the most enemy or the pilot who bombs the most targets that are the

heroes of the war but it is those people that stand up and proclaim the utter stupidity of

war. The heroes are those who stand up for what they believe is right even if that means

disobeying an order. These books were written most of all to share with us that war is

wrong and is a waste of valuable lives. They convinced us that all free will and sanity is

lost in war and that it can destroy men not just physically but also mentally. I think Heller

put it best when he described what Yossarian was going through when his friend was

dying in his arms,

“Yossarian was cold, and shivering uncontrollably. He felt goose pimples clacking all over

him as he gazed down despondently at the grim secret Snowden had spilled all over the

messy floor. It was easy to read the message in his entails. Man was matter, that was

Snowden’s secret. Drop him out a window and he will fall. Set fire to him and he will

burn. Bury him and he will rot, like other kinds of garbage. The spirit gone, man is

garbage

Show More
Related

  • Catch-22, by Joseph Heller

    1368 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are many ways to describe Yossarian, but the best characterization was by Colonel Cathcart:

    Read More

  • Theme Of Free Will In Slaughterhouse Five

    1025 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the novel, Kurt Vonnegut proposes the question of whether free will exist or not. The Tralfamadorians live with the idea of the fourth dimension. The fourth dimension contains occurring and reoccurring events, considering that they believe all moments have already passed. According to the Tralfamadorians, there is only free will on Earth, considering humans only think of time as a linear progression. Billy regresses back to events as a child, and remembers when his father let him sink to the bottom of the pool where he prefers to be, but he was rescued. As a young adult, Billy was drafted into the war against his free will. Even as a soldier in the war, Billy is not taken solemnly by the other soldiers. Billy comes to the conclusion that even if he trained hard, and became a good soldier he’d still die like the other soldiers in Dresden who are much better than him. Billy’s real world on earth seems to be taken into bits and pieces into the Tralfamadorian world where Billy thinks is error free. Although the serenity prayer is directed towards God, Billy directs it towards the Tralfamadorians instead. This prayer is significant to this theme, because Billy is trying to live up to the standards of the Tralfamadorians, which is nearly impossible and

    Read More

  • Catch-22 by Joseph Heller

    1068 Words  | 3 Pages

    Yossarian’s refusal to fly the ever-rising amount of missions and his reputation with the other men in his squadron show the heroic qualities of his actions. At first, his avoidance of combat seems merely self-centered, as the war is not something he believes in. When Yossarian has his traumatic experience trying to save Snowden in which he realizes that “man is matter” (450), his motives broaden as he realizes how fragile life is. Not only is he practicing self-preservation by refusing to fly, which can be seen as a heroic act in itself in a situation where life is so undervalued, but he is also refusing to kill and risk the lives of ...

    Read More

  • Conformism And Conformity In Catch-22 By Joseph Heller

    1186 Words  | 3 Pages

    He openly questions the war and the governments handling of if it. Yossarian was upset because ¨strangers he didn´t know shot at him with cannons everytime he flew up into the air to drop bombs on them.¨ (Heller 17). Yossarian followed orders for a long time until he began to realize that fighting strangers he didn´t know for reasons no one would tell him about. He felt like he was going in an endless circle, so he tried to rebel, but in the begining of his transformation, Yossarian was still conforming to the government. He did what the Generals and the Colonels told him too with only mild complaining. He did what he told to for a good part of the time and he was a halfway decent bombadier. He did his missions, and when the number of required missions was raised, he continued to fly more missions. The book´s anti-war message was made apparent through the eyes of Yossarian, who was once a previously decent soldier turned desserter. While he conformed outwardly, Yossarian rebeled internally and decided he had grown tired of the war and planned to join Orr in Sweden. He was a conformist through the begining of his time in the

    Read More

  • Theme Of Free Will In Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five

    1794 Words  | 4 Pages

    Due to the lack of free will, he recognizes that no person can change fate. As well as a

    Read More

  • Catch 22 by Joseph Heller

    912 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...and up to the Catch-22 scheme, he ends the novel with Yossarian standing up to the military and refusing to fly more missions. His growth over the course of the novel is important, however, the final chapters show him as a hero. After everything he has been through, including many deaths and the sight of Snowden in the plane, his ability to remain sane throughout the war proves heroic and his growth as a person has made him a valuable hero. The ripeness in “Ripeness was all” (450) concludes Yossarian’s boldness to stay alive because, after all, man can, for a short time, remain alive with himself. His loyalty to his fellow soldiers categorizes him as not only loyal but a soldier who cherishes the relationships he shares with his tent mates. His importance as a hero is defined by his act to face the military and help his fellow soldiers instead of being narcissistic.

    Read More

  • The Quandary Explored by Yossarian in Catch 22

    1179 Words  | 3 Pages

    Yossarian mistakenly blames others for his situation. Throughout the book, it is an evolution in itself as he realizes he is the only one in control of his fate.--he is the center of his universe. By refusing to conform, he causes all characters (some with more insight than others) to be confronted with possible meanings and logic behind his unusual behavior. "You have deep-seated survival anxieties. And you don't like bigots, bullies, snobs or hypocrites. Subconsciously there are many people you hate."

    Read More

  • Catch-22 and the Theme of Death

    885 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...but the desire to live is the most important impulse a man can have. But Yossarian can't live a life of hypocrisy or oppression under the military; this is what finally pushes him to desert. The knowledge that Orr finally paddled all the way to Sweden gives him hope, and he sees the only path he can take to be free. He knows it will be difficult, but he knows there is no alternative for him.

    Read More

  • War and Heroism in Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five

    780 Words  | 2 Pages

    Slaughterhouse Five is not a book that should be glanced over and discarded away like a dirty rag. Slaughterhouse Five is a book that should be carefully analyzed and be seen as an inspiration to further improve the well-being of mankind. Vonnegut makes it clear that an easy way to improve mankind is to see war not as a place where legends are born, but rather, an event to be avoided. Intelligent readers and critics alike should recognize Vonnegut’s work and see to it that they make an effort to understand the complexities behind the human condition that lead us to war.

    Read More

  • Essay on Theism versus Atheism in Catch-22

    792 Words  | 2 Pages

    This argument is manifested in a dialogue, approximately two pages in length, between Yossarian, the main character, and Lieutenant Scheisskopf's wife. In this particular scene, Yossarian and the lieutenant's wife are debating the existence of G-d, presumably in the Judeo-Christian sense. The scene begins with each character introduced as an atheist, although the degeneration of the argument eventually proves somewhat otherwise. Yossarian is portrayed as a character in a perpetually negative mindset; he is invariably bitter and jaded, particularly because he has been forced to fight in World War II. Yossarian's experiences have led him to expect the worst from life, and to disbelieve in a g-d that causes such things as tooth decay and pain. The reader knows very little about Lieutenant Scheisskopf's wife, aside from her sexual escapades with the soldiers serving under her husband. Nevertheless, she seems to be under the impression that there are things in life to be grateful for under any circumstances. Yossarian attempts to prove his point through a long-winded and rather humorous speech about G-d being a bumbling fool who "robbed old people of the power to control their bowel movements" (189). While Yossarian raises a valid question against the existence of G-d, the fact that he debates the existence of G-d at all and speaks as though G-d exists provides the loophole necessary for this G-d to be a Catch-22.

    Read More

  • Catch 22

    1348 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the novel several passages express the idea of escape and the eagerness to do so. With almost no way to get out of the war completely, Yossarian knew of a temporary way out. Pretending he still had liver problems, he was able to stay in a ward along with truly insane people. Yossarian is aware this is not the best place to be, nor does it have the most caring people there to help you, or even any sane people around, but it is away from the war.

    Read More

  • Catch-22

    587 Words  | 2 Pages

    Catch-22 is one of the most poorly constructed, and distasteful books I’ve ever read. It’s order of events, or lack of order, becomes clear after the very first chapter. In fact “It doesn’t even seem to have been written; instead it gives the impression of having been shouted onto paper” (Stern 50). By the middle of the book it seems every character in the book has lost any sense of morality they may have seemed to have. The novel “gasps for want of craft and sensibility” (Stern 50).

    Read More

  • Free Catch-22 Essays: The Character of Yossarian

    511 Words  | 2 Pages

    Yossarian can be seen as an anti-hero. Many of his actions could be considered immoral or cowardly. For example, in the hospital, he forged and tampered with letters he censored. Whenever he was overwhelmed by the horrors of war and by memories of his friends' deaths, he created symptoms that got him admitted to hospitals. He also made repeated attempts to be judged as certifiably insane so that he could be discharged. In the end, Yossarian deserted the Army and fled to Sweden, the only place he knew to be safe and sane.

    Read More

  • Captain John Yossarian Characteristics

    1659 Words  | 4 Pages

    Yossarian is a dynamic character. At first, he was a coward and focused on self-preservation. However, when he is given the option to save himself and be sent home, he refuses because he would be endangering his comrades and helping the enemy. This is a

    Read More

  • Real Heroes in our Society

    1806 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...nd embarrassed with their true desires not to fight. There is no freewill at this point because they feel obligated to be the patriotic men. They are confused not knowing the reason for this war but that it is “to stop the Communists, plain and simple” (O’Brien 45). Unfortunately is it not plain and simple, even a million words would not be able to express the experiences that these young men endure. Unlike the Lone Ranger, the soldiers would rather flee due to the natural human instincts toward a dangerous situation. Yet, they suppress their true feelings and fight with all they have. As we can see, the ones that fight to help people that they hardly know are indeed the regular, normal, and everyday human beings. With this in mind, we cannot count on the Lone Ranger to come to the rescue; rather, the heroes are right before our eyes. They are an “everyman.”

    Read More

More about Themes of Slaughterhouse 5 by Kurt vonnegut and Catch 22 by Joseph Heller

Open Document