Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
literary analysis on oedipus the king
oedipus the king synopsis
oedipus the king synopsis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: literary analysis on oedipus the king
Oedipus is guilty because, despite knowing the prophecy that he will commit parricide and incest, he yet kills an elderly gentleman and sleeps with an elderly women. The choice was his, and this accounts for his guilt. This is implausible because, at the time he killed the old man (his father) he had no idea of the prophecy that foreseen this happening. Even if he would have known about the Gods saying that he would do these things, it wouldn't have made much of a difference. For Oedipus thought his parents were different than who they really were. He had no idea that his real parents knew of the phrophecy and had him put in the mountains with pins in his ankles to die. He had no idea that a sheperd saved him and gave him to the King of Corinth. So he had no idea that the old man he met where the tree roads meet, was his real father, and he had no way of knowing that Jocasta was his real mother. So even if he knew that he would kill his father and sleep with his mother, he wouldn't have know that Laius was his real father and that Jocasta was his real mother. Even though the decisions to kill the old man and sleep with the older women were choices he made, he had no idea that these would be his parents. Also if the Gods make a prophecy, how is it that a mere mortal could change his own fate? A mere mortal cannot even see a God it its true form. So how could Oedipus defeat the prophecy made by a God. Although Oedipus may have been wrong to do what he did, I do not think you can use the word guilty to describe him. Even though Oedipus may be the hero, he is also selfish and ruthless. One example of his ruthlessness is when he meets Laius at the place where the three roads meet. Instead of letting the older man pass, he makes a scene, why should he be the one to move? He is royalty. He believes that he should move for no man. He is also selfish in the fact that when Teresias enters and gives Oedipus the clues that tell him that he has killed Laius, he refuses to believe him, to the point of insulting him, and kicking him out.
The choir represents the voice of the people, the voice of the masses. People often conform to this uniform truth, they want to be like other people. This conformation leads to a uniform voice from the public. This voice is often ignorant to the truth, seemingly to the point that it creates its own truth.
In most cultures killing another human is considered an act of severe moral consequences, for both the one who commits the murder and for society. Oedipus seems to be an honorable man and to discover he has inadvertently killed King Liaus, who also happened to be his long-lost father, would have surely placed the poor guy in a state of consternation. Sleeping with his mother, even inadvertently, I’m with Oedipus on that being an abomination, that would be hard to take. Again, Oedipus being an honorable man, both these acts and the suffering he has brought to his children and the city is an evil act.
The first solution to this question, as I said earlier, is the idea that destiny makes character. As destiny supposedly in the Greek mindset maps out all events before they occur, we can today assume with this logic that perhaps the components that "built" Oedipus' character were caused by fate. We know today that character is determined by biological factors and experience. These biological factors would have been determined by how well he was fed, how well he developed, his genes etcetera. The experience would have also been determined by the pre-destined master plan of Fate. Thus it is possible to argue that Oedipus, as components of his character and mind, was entirely shaped by fate and therefore cannot be held responsible for what he has done, as he has no control over his actions.
Oedipus the King: Reason and Passion In the play, Oedipus the King, there are dual parts of reason and passion. Oedipus primarily acts with both reason and passion at different stages in the play. There are several points in the play where Oedipus acts with reason. The first such point occurs when he is asked by his followers to help save Thebes. He acts with reason when he immediately decides to heed to their demands and find help for them.
Instead, if Oedipus was not blind, he would link the fact of his marriage, love, and bed as a sin, with the prophecy of marrying his mother. Tiresias even tells Oedipus “the murderer you seek/ is yourself”. (31) If Oedipus processes the information, he has found the killer of King Laius and solved the mystery. However, he keeps blinding himself to the truth. After this whole scene, Oedipus talks to his wife (and mother), Jocasta, about Tiresias’ prophecy to him. Jocasta scoffs at Oedipus for believing in all truth of prophets and tells her prophecy of how she avoided her fate of her son going to kill his father and marry her. With this, Oedipus begins to recall his prophecy. He, then, links everything together when the shepherd confirms that he killed King Laius. As Tiresias once told Oedipus, “wisdom is a mode of suffering”. (28) By knowing that he was the killer of King Laius and had slept with his mom, he pokes his eyes out with brooches and goes into an exile of
However, this argument is flawed because Sophocles portrays Oedipus as being generally relatable to the reader. For example, soon after he had learned that the prophecy came true, he shows his affection towards his children in a moving speech. One part that was especially heart-wrenching was when Oedipus says to his children, “I weep for you -- I cannot see your faces -- I weep when I think of the bitterness there will be in your lives, how you must live before the world,” (Sophocles lines 185-188). Oedipus’s fate can’t be justified by his own actions because he is a morally relatable human. This contention is also supported in Aristotle’s Poetics. Aristotle writes that the protagonist of any good tragedy ought to be neither morally superior nor morally defective. If Oedipus’s punishment was due to his character flaws, it follows that every normal person should meet a similar demise! Instead, his life was the gods’ method of bringing justice to the crime perpetrated by his father. Oedipus being punished for a crime that he didn’t commit shows the insignificance of the acts and intentions of humans compared to the goals of the
The selfishness that Oedipus possesses causes him to have abundance of ignorance. This combination is what leads to his father’s death. After fleeing Corinth and his foster family, Oedipus gets into a skirmish with an older man. The reason for the fight was because, “The groom leading the horses forced me off the road at his lord’s command” (1336). Oedipus is filled with a rage after being insulted by the lord and feels the need to act. The two men fight, but Oedipus ends up being too much for the older man, and he kills him. What Oedipus is unaware of is that the man was actually his birth father and by killing him, Oedipus has started on the path of his own destruction. Not only does Oedipus kill his father, but also everyone else, “I killed them all” (1336). The other men had no part in the scuffle, but in his rage, he did not care who he was killing.
Oedipus is innocent because he did not know the truth. He did not know his true parents. He was living his whole life a lie. When the messenger told him about the prophecy that he was going to kill his father and marry his mother. He left Corinth to avoid the prophecy.
Oedipus, king of Thebes, was destined to have two things happen to him: he was to murder his father and marry his mother with whom he’d have children. Despite his and others attempts to avoid this prophecy from coming true, unfortunately he was unable to avoid his fate. While he is guilty of actually doing the crimes he desperately tried to avoid, he is innocent of having malicious intent to commit the crimes or knowledge that he had actually committed them.
When Jocasta describes Laius' murder,it is easy to piece the story together and figure out that Oedipus was the murderer. The only reason that Oedipus does not realize the truth is because he does not want to, he is in denial and refuses to accept his identity. Likewise, when the messenger is speaking of the child brought to Polybus and Merope with bounded ankles, Oedipus should have realized that he was the child the messenger was speaking of, but he still refused to completely believe it until the herdsman was able to corroborate the messenger's
The play "Oedipus Rex" is a very full and lively one to say the least. Everything a reader could ask for is included in this play. There is excitement, suspense, happiness, sorrow, and much more. Truth is the main theme of the play. Oedipus cannot accept the truth as it comes to him or even where it comes from. He is blinded in his own life, trying to ignore the truth of his life. Oedipus will find out that truth is rock solid. The story is mainly about a young man named Oedipus who is trying to find out more knowledge than he can handle. The story starts off by telling us that Oedipus has seen his moira, his fate, and finds out that in the future he will end up killing his father and marrying his mother. Thinking that his mother and father were Polybos and Merope, the only parents he knew, he ran away from home and went far away so he could change his fate and not end up harming his family. Oedipus will later find out that he cannot change fate because he has no control over it, only the God's can control what happens. Oedipus is a very healthy person with a strong willed mind who will never give up until he gets what he wants. Unfortunately, in this story these will not be good trait to have.
The ancient Greeks were fond believers of Fate. Fate, defined according to Webster’s, is “the principle or determining cause or will by which things in general are believed to come to be as they are or events to happen as the do.” The Greeks take on Fate was slightly modified. They believed that the gods determined Fate: “…fate, to which in a mysterious way the gods themselves were subject, was an impersonal force decreeing ultimate things only, and unconcerned with day by day affairs.” It was thought that these gods worked in subtle ways; this accounts for character flaws (called harmatia in Greek). Ancient Greeks thought the gods would alter a person’s character, in order for that person to suffer (or gain from) the appropriate outcome. Such was the case in Oedipus’s story.
The topic of Oedipus being innocent or guilty for his acts is contemplated amongst many. “Guilt is an internal punishment that feeds on itself, resulting in an individual to have an obsessive behavior”. In Oedipus Rex, Oedipus is on a search to take revenge for the murderer of King Laios; however, throughout the course of the play, Oedipus discovers that the assassin is himself, fulfilling his destiny. Through my eyes, Oedipus is innocent because he committed such acts unknowingly. He proves himself innocent through his continuous honor to himself, the Gods, and his people by seeking for the sole slayer, wanting to discover his true identity when his memory of his killing comes back, and by brutally punishing himself for his unknowing acts.
in my mind, is not valid simply because of what it might do to the
Oedipus the king was destined to kill his father and marry his own mother, but a specific god seeks for justice be served. One of characters of on Oedipus Rex the priest pleads the king of the sufferings in Thebes, and the messenger brings down the blind prophet Tiresias to answer the king what Apollo has responded. "Relief from the plague can only come one way...[Uncover] the murderers of Laius, put them to death or drive them into exile." (Oedipus 621). Since Oedipus escaped his town in order to not make the prophecy true, what fault did he have that the prophecy had his future written down. He had no intentions of making that prophecy come true, but him killing the people in the carriage without even acknowledging it is the king is reasonable. He didn’t want them to know who he was, his parents have the fault of what happened to him, especially the king for sending him to be killed as a newborn. In the middle of the story Oedipus finds out that his father Polybus is fine, but he meets the sheep herder, Jocasta has already figured out who pleading the king to stop.