Education remains a cornerstone for society as it has for decades. Technology advances, the economy fluctuates, and politics change, but education remains, not only important but imperative for personal and social growth. Yet, as important as it is touted to be, the quality and purpose of learning is often lost in the assembly-line, manufactured process of education that exists today.
In a highly structured and economics-driven world, the educational system may be viewed as a machine designed to churn out future workers and employees. Like the fast-food industry, education has been standardized in an attempt to provide the comforts of efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control. In our aptly named McDonaldized society, aspects as important as quality are sacrificed in lieu of speed and profit. As far as education is concerned, however, this attempt to systemize and order something as complex as learning proves futile and detrimental to the basic tenet of enlightenment.
The standardization of the learning process proposes a simplified, singular approach to providing education to those who can afford it. Limiting material provided and lessons taught, tests, grading, function to create an easily controlled system. “Education” has been transformed and has come to connote “the transmission from a central source of knowledge to passive recipients” (McClellan. Online). However, the question remains whether this definition can actually suffice. The futility of a packaged education is put into context when it is realized that “meaningful learning, deep knowledge, collective wisdom and innovative action do not come from slick, pre-packaged course materials and efficient one-way transmission of information” but rather through the more complex idea called learning (McClellan. Online).
Unfortunately, the purpose of the education system, as seen in most institutions of higher education, is in fact to instill in people the notion that they are incapable of learning. The standardization of education highlights the underlying assumption that people “cannot learn without a pre-determined set of institutionalized options forced upon them” (Kyhall. Online).
The view of education as a commodity, rather than a means for intellectual, spiritual, or interpersonal growth, results in most educators and teachers offering st...
... middle of paper ...
...onal and social growth.
The cost of McDonaldization is clear. In terms of standardizing education, the model is “anti-diversity, anti-creativity, and anti-democratic” (Kyhall. Online). As a whole, the consumption of the simple solution called education will not solve the problems. The modern world is much too complex to be solved in a single approach. Furthermore, education creates danger in the world by devaluing learning and dehumanizing people. Learning cannot be confined to formal allotments such as school or colleges, and in our changing times, it becomes even more imperative that education be not a product to sell but a tool to enlighten, a means to promote growth rather than division. This is the true purpose of education. And it does not come pre-packaged.
Works Cited
Gidley, J. and S. Inayatullah. Youth Futures: Comparative Research and Transformative Visions. (2002): 34.
Kyhall. "The McDonaldization of Education" 15 Nov. 2012. Web. 28 Oct. 2014.
http://fundamentalsofsoc.edublogs.org/2012/11/15/the-mcdonaldization-of-education/
McClellan, Jock. “Metaphors, Words, and Models of a Wiser World.” The Swaraj Foundation. Web. 28 Oct. 2014.
Kessler’s points are accurate. I choose this topic because I can remember countless times that my mates would question the relevancy of the information being taught to them. This is an opportunity to illustrate that this irrelevancy is the reason for high college graduate unemplo...
Throughout many years, education has played an important role in improving our minds and society. However, what many people tend to forget is that our education is not at the best it can be. Education is defined as receiving or giving systematic instruction, especially at a school or university. Many people today questions whether or not our education depends on the people teaching it or if it’s the student’s responsibility to want to learn. "To what extent do our schools serve the goals of a true education?" Education helps people learn new things, but it can be changed. Although education helps students learn and plan for the future, it can be improved to help benefit students ahead of time.
In a letter to columnist Ann Landers, a college professor wrote about his views of the education system. He feels that universities have turned into businesses where teachers are just looking for money and students are just looking for a piece of paper with a title on it. He says that the students of today think they are automatically entitled to a degree because they pay tuition (Depressed Old Prof. 3-B). Adding to the profit motive for schools is the government which, for the p...
The history of the school system in the United States shows that the standard for teaching was centered on meeting the challenges of both the Agricultural Age and the Industrial Age, and according to Duffy (2010), was a fixed approach to teaching, designed for sorting students rather than for learning, in order to educate large numbers of children and to determine laborers from managers. However, the Knowledge Age is requiring stakeholders to reevaluate the requirements necessary for educating our children going forward. This societal paradigm shift is large and pervasive, requiring institutions to co evolve in creating more customized approaches to organization design, serving customers, and providing services so that students can succeed in the twenty-first century Knowledge Age (Duffy, 2010). The purpose of this paper is to share a planned and an unplanned change that has tak...
The need for education is a massive problem that the United States is facing in the current day. According to the United Way’s web...
...ut the low chances of productivity if teachers and universities constantly depended on contingent situations or amount of students. He used many generalizations, about how many students would automatically follow several different ideologues and believe opinionated facts, socially and politically driven ideas and beliefs. He also has two absolute ideas, whether a student learns as Fish explains or a student is politically and socially influenced. In conclusion, Fish argues about what a university should and shouldn’t do during the course of education. The developing of skills and knowledge is necessary, rather than developing ideologies and values. According to Fish, it is nearly impossible to create a classroom that shares both academic and external capacities (19).
In Conclusion, although I have a partial disagreement with some aspects of the article, it was with great pleasure I read it because I found the way in which the author relates education with many features of the American Culture innovate. Furthermore, it is impressive the way in which the author relates his life memories with the weakness of the field where he works. Events that most of us have experienced have been converted into strong arguments by the author. Education has been one of the pillars of modern countries. Thus, Mark Edmuson message should be taken as a foundation to future education strategies. The way in he expresses his thoughts shows a big desire to see an education system evolving in tandem with the society welfare.
Is it finally time to reinvert formal education in America? For centuries formal education in this country have been based on hierarchy, standardization and the system of “one-size-fits-all”. This form of education also prioritizes expertise and specialization while ignoring the obvious benefits of crowdsourcing. While this form of education might help some students, it also puts students who have difficult time with standardized tests at risk of failing or dropping out of school. Each human is unique in their own way and it’s time for society to gain the confidence to reinvent the education system that has failed many bright students who didn’t fit into the system. In the article “Project Classroom Makeover” by Cathy Davidson, the author
Education is not to teach men facts, theories or laws, not to reform or amuse them or make them expert technicians. It is to unsettle their minds, widen their horizons, inflame their intellect, teach them to think straight, if possible, but to think nevertheless. Robert Maynard Hutchins
This education revolves around key subjects such as “calculation, geometry, and all the preliminary education required for dialectic” (Plato, Republic 208). Although the American education system has re-organized these broader subjects into more specialized ones (math, reading, writing, history, art, music, etc.), the premise remains the same. These courses are to teach us the materials necessary to become educated citizens. It is interesting to note that under the main principles of a liberal democracy, universal education also plays a key role in self-agency. However, within both Plato and Aristotle’s definition and that of a modern-day democracy, there are certain nuances in “universal” education. In the U.S, stories of individuals who dropped out of college and are still successes in society while other individuals who worked hard to get through school to graduate and become leading surgeons are often recounted many times as the quintessential “American” stories. Similarly, according to Aristotle, “education too must be one and the same for all… but it is evident that they should not be taught all [of the same tasks]” (Aristotle, Politics 228). This is because some individuals who do not require certain skills outside of their natural occupation would only be burdened and enslaved if they had to learn these tasks. Therefore, based on their
The world without knowledge is in complete disorder; we don’t realize how empty and ignorant we are without knowledge. The ignorance within ourselves, nonetheless, can be filled with education and bring definite changes which can impact an individual, a community, a generation and eventually our world. Naturally the world, in the long run, is dependent upon the educated. Success is carried throughout the pursuit of obtaining skills and valuing the virtue of education and academics. Education, by far means, is the most important facet of college and well worth the investment.
The Traditional aim of education is often seen as a ‘teacher-centered’ approach to education where the teacher learner relationship is irrelevant. In the traditional aim each child is treated the same way and are expected to be equally ready to learn the prescribed content. In this approach individual student differences are not acknowledged, this can be seen by the way all students must complete standardized testing to measure abilities and achievements. “Instead of better education, we are getting cheating scandals, teaching to bad tests, a narrowed curriculum, lowered standards and gaming of the system” (Collins 2010). The traditional approach to education aims to prepare students for life in the workforce, and as stated by Deetz (1992) “the educational institution… trains for occupational success”. It is in this way that the capitalist nature of the traditional approach can be seen, whereby the students are exploited and the teacher holds all the power and knowledge. This idea is explore by Marxists who “split the social world into two opposing halves- those who have power and those upon whom power is exercised” (Tait 2012). It is in this way that by having power exercised upon them and being docile and pass...
From an early age, people learn how to cry, sleep, eat, walk, etc. All of these innate needs do not require a Harvard certificate or certain kind of people to do them. In human history, knowledge has an extended and steady shelf-life. From one time to another, the resources of learning and knowledge were changing differently. People invented schools, colleges, universities to expand knowledge and educate the society. Mostly, students receive knowledge that was constructed in academic settings. Knowledge depends on learning resources such as books, videotapes, and scientific laboratories. Learning resources experience different periods of modification to fit peoples’ needs. Today, traditional education that requires a teacher’s present in a classroom is going to disappear on short notice because students obtain knowledge not in a traditional learning pedagogies. Technological achievements, however, renovate learning processes in a different
The aim of education is to prepare students as contributing members in a productive society. The essential core values of knowledge, skills, critical thinking capability, and citizenship help students grow into adults who contribute positively to the community. I believe that education’s focus on teaching content matter leads to the development of well-rounded knowledge and skills in reading, writing, speaking, computing, thinking, science, and the social world in which we live. Specific content knowledge in these disciplines contributes to equity in education. Such knowledge becomes an internal asset for an individual and is priceless. Studen...
Education is a vital part of society. It serves the beneficial purpose of educating our children and getting them ready to be productive adults in today's society. But, the social institution of education is not without its problems. Continual efforts to modify and improve the system need to be made, if we are to reap the highest benefits that education has to offer to our children and our society as a whole.