The Life and Contribution to the Development of the British Empire of James Cook
I) Introduction
The purpose of this paper is to describe the life and the contribution to the development of the British Empire of one of the most important English explorers. It was in the second half of the 18th century when James Cook, originally a poor farm boy, explored and mapped vast uncharted areas of the Pacific and the Atlantic Ocean. However, James Cook was not ‘only’ an explorer. He can also be called a scientist – he managed to introduce new principles into seafaring and cartography.
For better understanding, the paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, which throws light on the purpose and structure of the paper.
The second chapter is a brief introduction to the situation in Great Britain in the 18th century. It helps to explain why and how the so called “the First British Empire” was built up and later destroyed, and what led to the creation of “the Second British Empire”.
The third chapter deals with Capt. Cook’s life and his three unique expeditions to the Pacific.
The fourth part of the paper summarises Cook’s achievements and his contribution to the development of the British Empire.
The fifth chapter forms the conclusion of the paper.
II) A brief introduction to the situation in Great Britain in the 18th century.
Great Britain became a great world power in this period. Under the leadership of William Pitt the Elder, Britain’s Prime Minister and at the same time a man who believed that the strength of the nation's economy depended on overseas expansion, the country gained vast territories all over the world and the so called “the First British Empire” was founded.
The reasons why Great Britain was so successful can be divided into four groups:
• “Revolutions” – the Industrial Revolution, a financial revolution and a revolution in agriculture made Britain the leading power in Europe. The creation of the Bank of England in 1694 helped to raise capital for colonial wars and to support British trade. At the beginning of the 18th century a series of mechanical inventions enabled the building of the world's first mechanised factories. A steam engine invented in1769 provided the power to drive machinery and thus enabled mass production of goods. The new ways of making products more quick...
... middle of paper ...
.... Impérium. Praha: BB art, 1999
CD-ROM:
Encarta 98 encyclopedia. „Cook, Captain James.“ Microsoft. CD-ROM.
Microsoft Item: X03-22823
Web sites:
http://152.105.19.10/scouts/nunthorp/seeonee/badgewk/history
http://www.britannia.com/history.
http://freespace.virgin.net/chris.jones/ccsu72.htm
http://freespace.virgin.net/chris.jones/ccsu73.htm
http://geography.about.com/science/geography/library/weekly/aa101397.htm
http://mmbc.bc.ca/source/schoolnet/exploration/cookdeath.html
http://members.tripod.com/cuculus/cookbio.html
http://winthrop.webjump.com/jcook.html
http://www2.lucidcafe.com/lucidcafe/library/95oct/jcook.html
http://www.arcticculture.about.com/culture/arcticculture/library/yafeatu
res/bl-Cook1.htm
http://www.bbc.co.uk/education/archive/voyager/history/hs_cook.shtml
http://www.captaincookstudyunit.com
http://www.geocities.com/TheTropics/7557/cook.html
http://www.jetcity.com/~kirok/cook.htm
http://www.lib.virginia.edu/exhibits/lewis_clark/ch4-25.html
http://www.mariner.org/age/cook.html
http://www.nmm.ac.uk/education/fact_cook.html
http://www.pacificcoast.net/~regent/cookbio.html
http://www.south-pole.com/p0000071.htm
To many of the English colonists, any land that was granted to them in a charter by the English Crown was theirs’, with no consideration for the natives that had already owned the land. This belittlement of Indians caused great problems for the English later on, for the natives did not care about what the Crown granted the colonists for it was not theirs’ to grant in the first place. The theory of European superiority over the Native Americans caused for any differences in the way the cultures interacted, as well as amazing social unrest between the two cultures.
... due to a long relationship of trade, alliance, and kinship with the French as well as the promise of "war honors" (Calloway, 2012, p. 174). In 1757, the British troops at Fort William Henry on Lake George surrendered to the French. This victory was short lived as most of the French's Indian allies attacked the surrendered fort because they felt betrayed by the terms of surrender. The native peoples unleashed a slaughter, which included scalps and captives (Calloway, 2012, p. 174). The Indians were severing ties with the French and the British war effort was increasing with vigor. The Native Americans began to side with the British not knowing what this would bring, which was more freedom and land stripped away from them.
The average British citizen in America during the 17th Century had a preconceived notion of Indians as savage beasts. However, before the arrival of the British, the New England Indians, specifically the Wampanoag tribe, lived a harmonious and interdependent lifestyle. Conflict among the Wampanoag was limited to minor tribal disputes. The war methods of the Indians were in fact more civilized than the British methods. The close living quarters of the British and Indians forced the Indians to adopt aspects of British civilization in order to survive, such as the ways of warfare. Douglas Leach in his book Flintlock and Tomahawk: New England in the time of King Philip's War argues that British influence on Indian society turned the Indians from savage to civilized. This paper will argue that British influence turned the Indians from civilized to savage. The examination of Wampanoag behavior from before British influence through King Philip's War proves that Wampanoag beliefs became more materialistic, that land ownership became important, and that unnecessary violence became a part of their warfare.
The conflicts between the Powhatan Empire and the English settlers in Axtell’s article can be said that the blame for the conflicts lands on both parties laps. When the two first met, they began as friends, offering goods to each other. It did not last long until the English customs, like discovery gives anyone right to it, posed a problem for the Indians because they never claimed land, they just moved around with the flow of the world around them. With this came contempt from the Native Americans toward the English. The Native Americans outnumbered the English but their arrows were no match for the English firepower, so they hide until they could even out the weapon power. The Powhatan’s knew they needed to manage the English from expanding while trading with them in order to obtain goods to fight. As the conflict ros...
Canny, Nicholas: The Oxford History of the British Empire,vol I, TheOrigins of the Empire (New York 1998)
When examining the bloody and often tumultuous history of Great Britain prior to their ascent to power, one would not have predicted that they would become the global leader of the 18th century. Prior to the Treaty of Westphalia, which ended the Thirty Years War, the Spanish and the Holy Roman Empire held much of the power in Europe. Only with the suppression of Catholicism and the development of national sovereignty did Great Britain have the opportunity to rise through the ranks. While much of continental Europe was seeking to strengthen their absolute monarchies and centralized style of governing, in the 17th and 18th centuries Great Britain was making significant political changes that reflected the ideals of the Age of Enlightenment. The first of the political philosophers was Thomas Hobbes who first introduced the idea that the monarch ruled not by “divine right” but through the consent of the people. This was a radical idea with ramifications that are reflected in the great changed Great Britain made to to their government in the 17th century. Through a series of two violent civil wars between the monarchy and Parliament and the bloodless civil war known as the Glorious Revolution, Parliament was granted the authority to, in essence, “check” the power of the monarchy. The internal shifts of power in Great Britain and the savvy foreign policy skills demonstrated by the British in much of the conflict happening in continental Europe can be credited with England’s rise to power.
Reflecting on the colonization of North America is an uneasy topic for most Americans. The thought of war between the Indians and the early settlers creates an image of clashing cultures between the well-armed Europeans and the hand-crafted weaponry of the native Indians. We tend to have the perception that the early colonists came and quickly took away the land from the Indians but, in reality, the Europeans did not have this power. Though French explorers and English settlers had a different perception of land ownership than that of the Native Americans, the fate of the Europeans rested in the hands of the Indians. Either from self-preservation, civility or curiosity, various American Indian tribes assisted the early European colonies through the sharing of resources, by befriending them as allies and, ultimately, by accepting them as permanent neighbors.
The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were tumultuous times in Europe. The major powers of Europe were all vying for dominance of the world economy, and were trying all kinds of methods in order to achieve that goal. As the centuries passed, Britain came to dominate the Atlantic trade and became one of, if not the major power in Europe. The question is though, how did Britain come to this dominant position in the Atlantic economy? While the rise of Britain cannot be attributed to just one aspect of society, it can be said that the economic policies of Britain greatly influenced their rise to power and are a significant reason for their dominance in Atlantic trade.
When the peace negotiation between Great Britain and the United States occurred, Britain had disregarded its Indian allies. It transferred all British-claimed land from the west up to the Mississippi River to the Americans, even though Indians were living throughout all of the territories. In 1793, Governor general Lord Dorchester and Sir John Johnson had informed Joseph Brant about their intentions to achieve peace between the western Indians and the United States. However, both men had intended on deliberately deceiving Brant, and donated false information
Folklores are stories that have been through many time periods. Folklore include Legends, Myths, and Fairy Tales. Legends are traditional tales handed down from earlier times and believed to have a historical basis. Myths are ancient stories dealing with supernatural beings, ancestors, or heroes. Fairy Tales are fantasy tales with legendary being and creators.
Overall, the gender metaphors used in Indian tribes and European societies were very similar. Shoemaker brings up an interesting point that gender metaphors come from a person’s daily experiences. This point complicates the thought that Indians and Europeans are complete polar opposites and maybe could have many more similarities between them.
Folklore is very important on a culture relating to legends, myths and fairy tales. The generations will keep telling the legends, myths and fairytales to the next
George Clark, An Illustrated History of Great Britain, Second Edition. Published by Oxford University Press in 1982
The importance of having a code of ethics is to define acceptable behaviors and promote higher standards of practice within a company. The code should provide a benchmark for...
Denmark has some of the harshest immigration policies in Europe. In reference to immigration laws, Jacob Mchangama, director of legal affairs for Cepos, The Danish Centre for Political Studies, had told Politiken, “Sure it’s a form of discrimination, but according to international law, states have the right to choose who is allowed to come in.” There are immigration laws so mixed up and edited over the years that not even lawyers can begin to comprehend the meanings of their contents. According to Jens Vedsted-Hansen, “Decisions on asylum, family reunification and EU residence are often right on the edge of Denmark’s international obligations and in some cases probably incompatible with international laws.” The long list of amendments to immigration laws, while it is good for the government to do since it shows that they are adjusting throughout the years, makes for a rather