Do You Know What I Mean?
Anyone familiar with music magazines will notice a common method used by most music critics: comparing artists to one or more of their peers. In most cases this method is critical to the review, especially if the readers have never heard the artist being reviewed. It gives them a point of reference, and if they like the artists being compared, they might buy the album. Such comparisons can work for or against an artist, but for one band in particular it has been incorporated into almost everything ever written about them.
Oasis were in the hands of the media right from the beginning. In a review of their first album, Definitely Maybe, Stuart Maconie referred to them as “manna from heaven in a slow newspaper week.” He gave almost as much attention to the rivalry between the two brothers and core members of the band, Noel and Liam Gallagher, as he did to the music itself. He pointed out that the music was nothing new and cited the Sex Pistols, T. Rex, the Stooges, and the Beatles as influences (Maconie). This last influence proved to be the most significant, as critic after critic used the Beatles as a focus point in describing Oasis. There were several reasons for the fixations on the Beatles and the Gallagher brothers’ social behavior when talking about Oasis.
Oasis never shied from the reality that they worshipped the Beatles, and that it showed in their music. In fact, the Beatles sometimes seemed to be their favorite topic of conversation in interviews. Noel claimed he wanted to introduce them to a new generation. They covered Beatles songs, including “You’ve Got To Hide Your Love Away,” and “I Am The Walrus,” the latter becoming a staple at their live shows. They also spoke of them in their ...
... middle of paper ...
...were deserving of every accusation that was ever hurled at them. It’s still just a matter of opinion, and none of it matters if you like the music.
Works Cited
Baker, Trevor. “Have Oasis Become A Joke?” Melody Maker. 20 Dec. 2000 - 2 Jan.
2001: 20-21.
Capobianco, Ken. “Oasis: Open Your Ears America.” Boston Globe. 8 June 2001: D15.
“In Brief: Oasis Star In ‘Assault’ Query.” The Gaurdian. 18 Jan. 2001: 14.
Maconie, Stuart. Rev. of Definitely Maybe by Oasis. Q 4 Music (Oct. 1994). online.
28 June 2001 < http://www.q4music.com/q4musicstore/DisplayProductDetails. cfm?ObjectUUID=A6DA73A2-9EBC-11D4-84460002553035E0>.
Mirkin, Steven. “Brotherly Love Tour, A Study In Contrasts.” Variety. 21 – 27 May
2001: 26.
Oasis. “D’You Know What I Mean.” Be Here Now. Sony, 1997.
Schoemer, Karen. “Derivative, And Darn Proud Of It.” Newsweek. 9 Jan. 1997: 12.
“Why The Grateful Dead Were the Greatest American Rock Band:, BlogCritics, BlogCritics, 2014, web, 16 April 2014
Analysis of Venezuela’s political history and current governmental systems, demonstrates former President Chávez designed the Executive Office to be the epicenter of the political system, and therefore a strategic COG. Within Venezuela’s present political system, Nicolas Maduro sits at the helm, leading the country through somewhat unstable political and economic times. To do this, he must persevere to sustain Venezuela’s sovereignty, safeguard its...
After James Monroe’s second term as the fifth president of the United States ended, preparations were already underway for the next election to determine who would become the president. There were four prominent candidates running. They were Henry Clay, John Quincy Adams, William H. Crawford, and Andrew Jackson. John C. Calhoun, who was Secretary of War under Monroe, was originally thinking of running as president but dropped out in the hope of becoming Vice President. Clay was the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Adams was the Secretary of State under President Monroe, Crawford was most notably Secretary of the Treasury under Monroe, and Jackson was a war hero during the War of 1812. For the first time, none of the men who were running for office identified as Federalists. A Federalist is someone who believes in a strong central government. All four men said that they were Democratic-Republicans. The Democratic-Republicans, who were also known as the Republican party, generally opposed the viewpoints that the Federalists held. They believed in states’ rights; that is that the states should be more powerful than the National government....
Since the 1970s, Venezuela has gone from being South America’s richest nation into a nouveau-poor society in search of an identity. Once known as the Saudis of the West, Venezuelans have seen their economic fortunes decline in exact proportion to the general fall in world oil prices. Even so, Venezuela’s many problems were hidden from view until relatively recently, when severity measures heralded the sort of economic crises so painfully familiar to other Latin American countries. Runaway inflation, currency devaluations and even food riots have marked this new phase in Venezuelan history, to which the country is still trying to adjust.
Poverty remains high in Venezuela. The rise and fall of prices of oil influences the poverty, income, and unemployment rates. Spending of education and healthcare may increase the economic growth in Venezuela. However, rising costs and new healthcare jobs dealing with foreigners are developing slowly. Simultaneously, social investment has led to better standards in terms of living. This inc...
The people in Venezuela are starving and dying because they don't have food. Venezuela is struggling with shortages of food,and medicine. Venezuela’s economy mostly depends on their oil.Oil prices have dropped and that has affected Venezuela. The food crisis is bad because in grocery stores there is no food so there is specific days people have to line up. In the text from the website it states “Venezuelans are bearing the brunt of the economy's problems. The government can't pay to import basic food items like milk, flour and eggs, leaving many supermarkets with empty shelves.” This quote shows that Venezuela is struggling with food and with money and the government doesn't do much to help their
The presidencies of Hugo Chavez and Nicolas Maduro are key factors in the lead to the Venezuelan conflict, as their policies and domineering style, have caused great controversy and unrest over the nation. From 1999 until 2013, President Hugo Rafael Chavez Frias ruled Venezuela. Leader of the Fifth Republic Movement from 1999 until 2007 when it merged with other parties to form the United Socialist Party of Venezuela which he led until his death in 2013. Nicolas Maduro Moro, alongside Chavez, was Venezuela’s vice president; prior to his death, Chavez proclaimed Maduro as his successor, leading to Maduro’s presidency inheritance in 2013 after Chavez’s death. From the beginning of his presidency, Chavez proposed and ratified democratic socialist economic policies. These included land reforms, redistribution of wealth and democratization of economic activity. Chavez’s claimed these new policies were aimed at improving economic, social and cultural conditions. In 2010 a report showed successes in literacy, healthcare, poverty and ec...
Venezuela was one of the richest countries that emerged from the collapse of Gran Colombia in 1830 (the others being Colombia and Ecuador). For most of the first half of the 20th century, Venezuela was ruled by generally benevolent military strongmen, who promoted the oil industry and allowed for some social reforms. Democratically elected governments have held sway since 1959. Current concerns include: a polarized political environment, a politicized military, drug-related violence along the Colombian border, increasing internal drug consumption, overdependence on the petroleum industry with its price fluctuations, and irresponsible mining operations that are endangering the rain forest and indigenous peoples.
The Beatles are known, respectively, as the fathers of modern pop music. After their first #1 hit “Please Please Me” was released in 1963 the Beatles were set in motion to become one of the most influential groups of musicians to ever rock our world. With over forty-nine records, 37 #1’s, and thirty- four number one albums (the highest amount of any band in history), there is no denying that they made a monumental ripple in the musical world. John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, and Ringo Starr surprisingly all come from humble beginnings in a town that, until their superstardom, was barely noticed on the map. Liverpool, being kn...
However, in the cynical and judgmental world that we live in, it is impossible for any artist - regardless of their success - to go without criticism. Personally, I am a fanatic for the Sons’ songs, which are rich in emotion (musically and lyrically) and electrifying in their deliveries; they combine a variety of instruments (i.e. an electric banjo and a mandolin) with those more commonly heard in popular music, creating a totally new listening experience and a truly unique sound. Every word is sung with passion, and every instrument sings its own song. Yet, others have not been as approving; some critics have even dismissed Mumford & Sons as “Coldplay with a banjo”. Whatever the critics say, the Sons’ star-spangled success is a reality, and surely looks lik...
The Beatles consisted of four talented men: Paul McCartney, John Lennon, George Harrison and Richard Starkey. They had met at all different times and had one thing in common. They all loved music. McCartney, Lennon and Harrison all played guitar and Starkey, also known as Ringo Starr, played the drums. They started out as The Quarry Men, but eventually they changed the name to The Beatles. They played a lot together over the years and at many different places. They started out as a “teenybopper” band, as Russell Gibb put it. They were like the Jonas Brothers of the fifties. When they made their way to America, they became more popular. Gibb also noted that they grew up with their fans. They did well all through the sixties, but around 1965 tension gre...
Throughout the fourteen years that remained in power Chávez followed strategy of introducing a socialist government in Venezuela in stages. According to Enrique Standish in the article titled “Venezuela Finally Turns Communist” it happened in four stages. The first stage consisted of obtaining t...
...ns Hopkins University in Baltimore, MD., and also a Senior Fellow and Director of the Troubled Currencies Project at the Cato Institute in Washington,D.C. offers on this article a synopsis about Venezuela’s economic. Steve Claims Venezuela’s downward economic spiral began in earnest when Hugo Chavez imposed his “unique” brand of socialism on Venezuela. For years, the country has sustained a massive social spending program, combined with costly price and labor-market controls, as well as an aggressive foreign aid strategy. This fiscal house of cards has been kept afloat barely by oil revenues. As the price tag of the regime has grown, the country has dipped more and more into the coffers of its state-owned oil company, PDVSA, and (increasingly) relied on the country’s central bank to fill the fiscal gap. This has resulted in a steady decline in the bolivar’s value.
The 21st century has brought a lot of modern ideas, innovations, and technology. One of these is social media. The invention of Facebook has completely changed the way we communicate with one another. Instant messaging, photo sharing, and joining online groups have created a way for families and friends to connect. Some argue that Facebook is the greatest invention however, while it is seemingly harmless, Facebook has created an invasion of privacy. The accessibility of Facebook and its widespread use has created privacy problems for users, teens, and interviewees by allowing easy control to viewers.
There is a sense of complexity today that has led many to believe the individual investor has little chance of competing with professional brokers and investment firms. However, Malkiel states this is a major misconception as he explains in his book “A Random Walk Down Wall Street”. What does a random walk mean? The random walk means in terms of the stock market that, “short term changes in stock prices cannot be predicted”. So how does a rational investor determine which stocks to purchase to maximize returns? Chapter 1 begins by defining and determining the difference in investing and speculating. Investing defined by Malkiel is the method of “purchasing assets to gain profit in the form of reasonably predictable income or appreciation over the long term”. Speculating in a sense is predicting, but without sufficient data to support any kind of conclusion. What is investing? Investing in its simplest form is the expectation to receive greater value in the future than you have today by saving income rather than spending. For example a savings account will earn a particular interest rate as will a corporate bond. Investment returns therefore depend on the allocation of funds and future events. Traditionally there have been two approaches used by the investment community to determine asset valuation: “the firm-foundation theory” and the “castle in the air theory”. The firm foundation theory argues that each investment instrument has something called intrinsic value, which can be determined analyzing securities present conditions and future growth. The basis of this theory is to buy securities when they are temporarily undervalued and sell them when they are temporarily overvalued in comparison to there intrinsic value One of the main variables used in this theory is dividend income. A stocks intrinsic value is said to be “equal to the present value of all its future dividends”. This is done using a method called discounting. Another variable to consider is the growth rate of the dividends. The greater the growth rate the more valuable the stock. However it is difficult to determine how long growth rates will last. Other factors are risk and interest rates, which will be discussed later. Warren Buffet, the great investor of our time, used this technique in making his fortune.