Which is better - suffering, agonizing, and holding onto life for a short period of time or just being laid to rest in peace? Nine out of ten people would pick the latter if just asked that question without a scenario, but when given an example containing their family they might change their opinion. This is when the question of whether or not euthanasia should be an option comes into play. Euthanasia is a topic to which many people do not give a lot of thought. When reading about euthanasia and having to make the decision whether or not I support or oppose it, I came to the conclusion that I support euthanasia - but only in certain cases. I believe the call for euthanasia or assisted suicide changes depending on the situation. I believe euthanasia sometimes becomes an excuse for people not to deal with suffering, but I also think euthanasia can be just the right answer for someone faced with holding on to the last few hours of his life, in complete agony. There are several arguments opposing euthanasia as well as several arguments supporting euthanasia, both stating valid points. One article states that "government does not have the right to give one group of people the power to kill another" (International Task Force p.5). I do not believe euthanasia is "having the power to kill". When exerted in the right situations, I believe euthanasia is sometimes the most practical solution. Although I disagree with some cases where euthanasia has been carried out, I agree with the thought of lessening the terminal suffering of people, no matter what might have to happen in order for that to take place.
One might think euthanasia could be carried out wherever the person is at the time they want to die, when in rea...
... middle of paper ...
...l as getting a shot. I agree with euthanasia in certain situations, but I do not agree that life should be taken lightly and put to end just for mere convenience. When hearing about certain cases where euthanasia has been used, I believed taking lives for convenience is becoming more and more prevalent. All in all, trying to make a solid and firm decision stating whether I support or oppose euthanasia is very difficult. I truly believe each case needs to be examined before any procedures are carried out. For those families who think euthanasia is the best decision for their loved one, I know they say nothing more than "Rest in peace, my dearly beloved."
Work Cited
Marker, Rita. "International Task Force on Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide." International Task Force: FAQ's. 2009. International Task Force. 10 March 2010.
http://internationaltaskforce.org/faq.htm
In the year of 1939, Australia had joined the war effort. In this year Poland had been invaded by Hitler resulting in Britain declaring war on Germany. This declaration initially meant that Australia would be called to support Britain. Many Australian men enlisted in the armed forces leaving predominately women on the home front. This movement initially affected the Australian home front where the labour force had predominately consisted of men. In order for the Australian economy and war effort to function it was clearly evident that all members of Australian society would need to chip in.
Women’s role in society changed quite a bit during WWI and throughout the 1920s. During the 1910s women were very short or liberty and equality, life was like an endless rulebook. Women were expected to behave modestly and wear long dresses. Long hair was obligatory, however it always had to be up. It was unacceptable for them to smoke and they were expected to always be accompanied by an older woman or a married woman when outing. Women were usually employed with jobs that were usually associated with their genders, such as servants, seamstresses, secretaries and nursing. However during the war, women started becoming employed in different types of jobs such as factory work, replacing the men who had gone to fight in the war in Europe. In the late 1910s The National American Woman Suffrage Association (NAWSA) had been fighting for decades to get the vote for women. As women had contributed so much to the war effort, it was difficult to refuse their demands for political equality. As a result, the Nineteenth Amendment to the constitution became law in 19...
Despite World War II being a tragic conflict that consumed the lives of so many, destroyed homes and livelihoods, and scattered families around the globe, it was ironically beneficial to the role and status of Australian women. Women’s roles in society were dramatically affected during and after the Second World War. This changed society in that it gave women more choices on how to live their lives and men accepted and respected women as equals not only professionally and economically but socially. The significance of these occurrences within Australia becomes present when reviewing and comparing the roles of women before and after WWII.
...loyment, economic battles, and stereotypical ways of life within the social order. Subsequent to the war, women had undergone through unfair compensation, loss of postwar employment, and the demands of returning to the old unchanged ways by government propaganda. As a result, these statements confirm that women are capable of great things, but their place in society were not positively affected by the end of the second war. By the end of the war there were 460,000 women in the military and 6.5 million in civilian work. Unfortunately it wasn't until the 1960s that any real, tangible change was seen for women. Without the contribution of women on the home front, there may have been no chance at winning the war. In the end, it seemed that the country disregarded that there once was a period when women were needed and were the main foundation for the country's triumph.
INTRO: The role of women transformed drastically between the First World War and after the Second World War (1914-1945). Women weren’t required to perform the ‘traditional’ roles anymore. All over the world women’s roles were changing even though many challenges were in their way. Women fought for equality, the trust of the opposite sex in the workforce and basically any other basic human rights, such as voting. Women went through many obstacles to be where they stand today and that should never be taken as granted. Even though a total equality between men and women might not be in existence, women have come really far from where they started.
Assisted suicide is becoming increasingly more common. Arguing the topic is extremely hard because it means the the life or death of a human being. Today, assisted suicide is legal in multiple countries, but only a few states in the US support this. Therefore, creates a struggle for any person wanting to go through this process. Being this is a broad topic, most people are torn between one side, I personally believe there should be a compromise in between the middle. For instance, not just someone going through a troublesome time in their life should have the ability to up and kill himself. That in my perspective is taking an easy way out for something that is worth a tremendous amount. However, the few people with a deadly illness or cancer that can no longer fight the pain or perhaps unresponsive should be given that option. Just because we have the ability to be euthanized does
During the World War II era, the outlook on the role of women in Australian society revolutionised. As a majority of men were at war, Australian women were encouraged to rise above and beyond their stereotypical ‘housewife’ status. They were required to take on the tasks that were once considered predominantly male roles, and also allowed the opportunity to join the armed services as well as enlist in the Women’s Land Army. Many women who doubted their abilities played their part by entering voluntary work. Women had the privilege of contributing in Australian society in many ways that they had never been able before. Thus, it is manifest that the role of women in Australian society had drastically changed.
Women showed their skill and ability to work, changing their role in society. “Women were hired for traditionally male occupations” (“Women in business”). After being hired for male jobs, women were portrayed differently and not as the average housewife. In 1944 women addressed the fact they do not get equal pay for equal work and to have working conditions improved (“Women in Society”). That included having childcare for working mothers. This prepared women to be more aggressive and be more demanding so society would accept them and so they could continue taking on these nontraditional roles after war (“Women in Society”). Working made women more demanding and they stood up themselves. It did take some convincing to have women join the workforce. The concept of working women was encouraged and advertised during the war because employment was necessary. Rosie the Riveter was also a shaped image and type of role model for women to follow (“Women in Society”). Women were comfortable being housewives before the demand for workers, but things had to change. Women’s viewpoint changed from staying home and taking care of the household, to them not wanting to be known as a housewifes anymore. “They demanded participation in the public arena and refused to accept the restrictions of traditional gender roles”(“Women in Society”). Women wanted to participate more in the community and contribute more to the country. Not only did they want to participate more in society, but they wanted to be viewed as equal to men in society. In 1944, women addressed the fact they do not get equal pay for equal work and to have working conditions improved. That included having childcare for working mothers. This prepared women to be more aggressive and be more demanding so society would accept them and to continue taking on these nontraditional roles after the war (“Women in Society”). After witnessing how they were able
... greater pain and anguish for longer periods of time than my father did, I believe euthanasia is the only compassionate form of relief we can provide. I believe it is morally important to allow an individual to die with respect for his or her dignity, while respecting his or her autonomy. Because of these reasons, euthanasia is morally justified when administered under strict controls.
Despite these criticisms, the reforms in public administration have had a widespread impact across this country and around the world. The principles underlying these reforms have enhanced government performance and accountability, public administration has employed various strategies to streamline management and enhance pubic service. It is important to keep in mind that while there may be significant improvement in productivity as a result of technological advances or reform, the most meaningful long-term gains will come about as a result of attention to the humans side of the organization. Successful public administration demands a successful balance between the concerns of the technical side of the agency and paying attention to people.
According to Sapru R.K. (2008) p370-371 the traditional ideal of public administration which inclined to be firm and bureaucratic was based on processes instead of outcomes and on setting procedures to follow instead of focusing on results. This paradigm can be regarded as an administration under formal control of the political control, constructed on a firmly ranked model of bureaucracy, run by permanent and neutral public servants, driven only by public concern. In emerging nations the administration was true bureaucracy meaning government by officers. In this perspective Smith (1996) p235-6 perceived that“the bureaucracy controls and manages the means of production through the government. It increases chances for bureaucratic careers by the creation of public figures,demanding public managers, marketing boards.
We live an ever-changing society that should not view Euthanasia as an unethical action, but as a way of help for suffering patients. Everyday their are thousands of hard working individuals that are diagnosed with a terminal illness and are now faced with decisions that must both be in the best interest for them and their families. This is neither an easy choice nor one that should be made without serious thought, but it should not be denied or penalized by society or government. It is a choice that must be made only by the patient in question with the input and understanding of their families. Many members of our society have worked very hard throughout their lives and if it is their desire to elect Euthanasia to spare them of the pain and the financial burden that a fatal illness would leave behind, then so be it.
Euthanasia, a sensitive and delicate subject. The termination of someone who is very sick to relieve them of the suffering of their disease is a great moral dilemma. The debate on the ethics of Euthanasia can incite strong emotions on both sides of the argument, those who support the idea and those who oppose the idea with great dislike. I happen to believe that euthanasia or assisted suicide is not as morally wrong as some people make it out to be. Does an individual on his deathbed not have the right to die with dignity and no pain? Is putting that individual out if his misery not morally right? Is trying to stop ones suffering not morally wrong?
...r of Rights and Freedoms states that, “Everybody has the right to life, liberty, and the security of person.” By allowing euthanasia we are defying those basic rights to life. A persons right to life is now a persons right to die. One study shows that the majority of depressed elderly patients wanted to be euthanized, but no longer wanted to die after they got treatment. Euthanasia will provide death with dignity. A person should die knowing they are loved and their doctor did everything they could to keep them comfortable through the pain. Palliative care is the best for patients that want to die with dignity.
Public personnel administration consists of three general systems. The first one I’ll talk about is civil service. The civil service helps to protect employee rights and safeguard efficiency. Historically, personnel administration shifted from emphasizing the value of responsiveness to emphasizing political neutral competence among public employees. Before they would use the spoils system and the patronage system, which selected employees and awarded government contracts based on loyalty or party affiliation. In this present day, we are using more of the civil service system, which is a method of choosing employees based on certain formal qualifications such as competitive exams instead of political patronage. It all start...