Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
the relationship between religion and morality
the relationship between religion and morality
the relationship between religion and morality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: the relationship between religion and morality
Morality without God
This question begins by assuming morals were created entirely by God
and not just approved of by God. It also bypasses the possibility that
there is no such God and man created morals using the authority
intrinsic in the idea of a God in order to enforce them; thus raising
the possibility that morals are learned but also partly innate and
instinctual to humankind. The ideas raised target those who have no
religious persuasion, namely those who consider themselves to be
atheist or agnostic. The claim implicit in the question (in assuming
that God exists) is that all morality and sound ethical values stem
from religion, without which motivation towards virtuous behaviour
becomes ambiguous.
In assuming that the Ten Commandments were never written and a list of
moral rules never set out, it is easy to imagine a world where
barbarity and survival of the fittest becomes as natural for human
beings as it is for wild cats of the African Savannah. With these
rules to fall back on, humans have guidelines, discipline and
structure to a subject that is often problematic. Morality is an
ambiguous subject because, unlike natural laws that offer up a
specific and tangible consequence when broken, moral laws merely carry
the name ‘law’ as an indication to their ideal weight whereas in
reality these ‘laws’ can be broken without necessarily bad
consequences or any at all. Belief in God can solve the problem of
obedience to a moral law, as, when broken or deviated from the person
can expect to travel to Hell in the afterlife, rather than the
preferred destination of Heaven; the ultimate reward for...
... middle of paper ...
...se that
distinguishes morality from immorality and as seen in the case of
people never exposed to Christianity or any large civilisation with a
God, the same sentiments are still conveyed and held as beliefs. Loss
of morality through choice is a far more reasonable suggestion than a
complete lack of it if the idea of God has not come into existence. To
therefore suggest that society would have no form of morality if there
had been no God and no religion is as unsustainable an argument as a
society with no form of morality.
Bibliography
Peter Singer, Chapters 4 and 7, Practical Ethics (2nd edition),
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993
Bernard Williams, Chapters 7 and 8, Morality: An Introduction,
Cambridge University, 1993, 2004
Plato, Book 1, Chapter 3, Plato: The Republic (2nd edition), Penguin
idea that we only can have ideas about god if he exists, but the idea
Friedrich Nietzsche’s “On the Genealogy of Morality” includes his theory on man’s development of “bad conscience.” Nietzsche believes that when transitioning from a free-roaming individual to a member of a community, man had to suppress his “will to power,” his natural “instinct of freedom”(59). The governing community threatened its members with punishment for violation of its laws, its “morality of customs,” thereby creating a uniform and predictable man (36). With fear of punishment curtailing his behavior, man was no longer allowed the freedom to indulge his every instinct. He turned his aggressive focus inward, became ashamed of his natural animal instincts, judged himself as inherently evil, and developed a bad conscience (46). Throughout the work, Nietzsche uses decidedly negative terms to describe “bad conscience,” calling it ugly (59), a sickness (60), or an illness (56); leading some to assume that he views “bad conscience” as a bad thing. However, Nietzsche hints at a different view when calling bad conscience a “sickness rather like pregnancy” (60). This analogy equates the pain and suffering of a pregnant woman to the suffering of man when his instincts are repressed. Therefore, just as the pain of pregnancy gives birth to something joyful, Nietzsche’s analogy implies that the negative state of bad conscience may also “give birth” to something positive. Nietzsche hopes for the birth of the “sovereign individual” – a man who is autonomous, not indebted to the morality of custom, and who has regained his free will. An examination of Nietzsche’s theory on the evolution of man’s bad conscience will reveal: even though bad conscience has caused man to turn against himself and has resulted in the stagnation of his will, Ni...
The Necessity of Religion in Today's Society No, religion in NOT necessary in today’s society. Maybe not every war but, the main cause of some of the most devastating wars has been religion. Today, discrimination is based on a person’s belief or religion. Though some might say that discrimination could be based on clothes or looks, but those trends may be demanded of them by their religious beliefs.
Would you describe a dog as capable of being evil? Or a cat? Or a chimpanzee? Most likely you could not. We humans belong to the taxonomic kingdom of Animalia and are therefore animals. Our species has evolved from animals that looked and acted more like the modern chimpanzee than we do. So at what point did we go from being creatures of instinct do developing the concept of morality? A great deal of literature has been written about morality, examples of which can be located in fiction and non-fiction as well as in scientific, theological and philosophical fields. Specific examples include the bible, as well as the writings of Plato (c. 424-348 BCE), Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527) and John Steinbeck (1902-1968). Morality is a trait that is developed as a result of practical material situations and experience as exemplified in The Grapes of Wrath, challenged by St. Matthew, but reinforced in the writings of Plato; we humans are born morally neutral.
The Moral Argument for the Existence of God Kant did NOT put forward a moral argument and anyone who said he does is wrong!!!! Kant rejected all attempts to argue from the world to God, he regarded such an exercise as impossible. However he thought that God was a POSTULATE of practical reason. If you share Kant’s assumptions, then it becomes necessary to assume that there is a God.
“Moral requirements are based on standards of rationality” (Johnson). Rational thinking allows us to determine right from wrong. This conscious decision leaves one with a choice of whether or not to act upon it. Understanding that a certain action, or lack thereof, will lead to negative consequences yet deliberately choosing such action is the bases of moral culpability. However, subjectivity of ethics and philosophies such as utilitarianism prove that moral culpability is entirely 2-dimensional and cannot account or explain the wide range of conflicting morals and ethics. An action can not be convicted as morally culpable because morals are entirely subjective and cannot be classified as right or wrong.
The necessity of religion is a topic that has been widely debated by many people for many years. The vast majority of the 7 and a half billion people on this earth practice some sort of religion but for what purpose? Whether it’s too give people hope for an afterlife or too fuel their need for contact with others people can list hundreds of different reasons why they rely on religion but is religion actually essential to our wellbeing and and life quality on this planet?
that the idea of a God may be questioned or less acceptable to the people, when
In an organized religion debate, Alan Dershowitz and Alan Keyes contended many issues on religion and morality. Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard law professor, believed that "morality can be maintained without religion." He also stated that it must be maintained without religion because times have changed. He said that if religion is not separated from state it could have severe damage, such as the Crusades and the Holocaust. Dershowitz believes that there is a difference between morality and religion. When people are moral without religion, they are being virtuous on their own, not because they are afraid of God. He stated that religion should not consist of a Cost-Benefit Analysis. Alan Keyes, a former Republican presidential candidate, stated that religion sets the standard for what's moral. Keyes argued "power only ultimately respects another power," and Martin Luther King Jr. was not a preacher by accident. Dershowitz also stated that not everything in the Bible should be believed word-for-word, even George Washington said "indulge religion with caution." Keyes believed that if state and religion should be separated, then why does the Declaration of Independence contain so much about religion? Alan Dershowitz and Alan Keyes would have argued endlessly about religion's role in society if there were not a moderator to stop them.
Mustapha Mond is the most powerful character in Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. Mond keeps scientific and historic documents from reaching the people. Mond believes that science, religion, and art threaten Brave New World if let out, but religion would be bane of Brave New World.
James Rachels expresses his thoughts on what a satisfactory moral theory would be like. Rachels says a “satisfactory theory would be realistic about where human beings fit in the grand scheme of things” (Rachels, 173). Even though there is an existing theory on how humans came into this world there is not enough evidence to prove the theory to be correct. In addition to his belief of knowing how our existence came into play, he also has a view on the way we treat people and the consequences of our actions. My idea of a satisfactory moral theory would be treating people the way we wish to be treated, thinking of what results from our doings, as well as living according to the best plan.
Christian Smith (2005) consider Moralistic Therapeutic Deism as a type of religion where individuals believe that central to living a good and happy life is being a good, moral person (p. 47). According to Scott Hughes (2018) MTD is considered the “sole gatekeeper of authority it is believed that religion is not necessarily bad, but it is looked upon as being unnecessary. It has ultimately diminished the role of religion to a resource of personal growth” (Hughes 2018). The central belief of our faith has never been simply that god only exists, therefore MTD does not situate itself within the story of the triune God. Because the Triune God who has revealed himself to all mankind as the Father, Son and Holy Spirit as being the way, the truth,
In God and Objective morality: A debate, Craig interprets the objective morality and states that the existence of God is the only foundation of objective morality. My purpose of this paper is to argue against Craig’s argument. My thesis is objective morality does exist in society to both theists and atheist, and the foundation of the moral value to individuals does not have to be God. For an atheist, God is also an abstract and not reliable foundation. Social harmony is the general foundation of moral value in modern society, and it is objective without the existence of God. In §1, I present the Craig’s argument and explain the motivation of each premise. §2, I present my critique and show that Craig’s argument fails. In §3, I defend against possible rebuttal.
To answer this question, we must first understand what both ethics and morality are. As ethics is defined as the philosophical study of morality, those who study religion get their moral precepts from what they believe God says should be done. This perspective is not at all unexpected, because all religions apply a perspective on morality. Morality is defined as beliefs concerning right and wrong, good and bad- beliefs that can include judgements, values, rules, principles, and theories. Morals are what help us guide our actions, define our values, and give us reason for being the person that we are.
When considering morality, worthy to note first is that similar to Christian ethics, morality also embodies a specifically Christian distinction. Studying a master theologian such as St. Thomas Aquinas and gathering modern perspectives from James Keenan, S. J. and David Cloutier serve to build a foundation of the high goal of Christian morality. Morality is a primary goal of the faith community, because it is the vehicle for reaching human fulfillment and happiness. Therefore, great value can be placed on foundations of Christian morality such as the breakdown of law from Aquinas, the cultivation of virtues, the role of conscience in achieving morality, and the subject of sin described by Keenan.