Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
the economic policies that Lenin introduced
the economic policies that Lenin introduced
contribution of marxism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: the economic policies that Lenin introduced
The Extent to Which Sources Agree that Russian Government Policy on Agriculture Constantly Fails and Peasants Resisted it Under the Tsarist
The definition of a peasant remains the same throughout the period
studied; 'A peasant is a person who permanantly lives and works on the
land'. The peasants resistance was either a physical or mental
movement where they opposed and refused to comply with new
agricultural reforms passed. The initial impressions gathered from
sources one to six is that consistant failure of agricultural policy
is dominant throughout, yet peasants resistance is not so easy to
detect.
The period covered by the sources, begin and end with consistant
agriculture failure. Sources 4, 5 and 6 show consistant policy failure
during the communist rule of Khrushchev. Source 6 written by Alex Nove
describes 'the picture as a whole was very disappointing', this
description agrees with the account given in source 4 that the Virgin
Lands Scheme was 'Poorly organised, with stupid decisions and
ill-concevied strategies',therefore supporting consistant failure.
Source 6 disagrees with source 4 as Nove believed that the failure of
the Virgin Lands Scheme was due to Krushchev inheritance of a
generation of 'neglect and impoverishment'. The source shows very
limited evidence of peasants resistance, except that they were treated
'with instintive suspicion', implying that if previous resistance had
not occured they would not have been treated this way.
Source 4, an extract from Edward Shevardnadse, describes Khrushchev's
Virgin Land Scheme. The source has a negative tone; 'we watched
helplessly', 'as the country began to break down'....
... middle of paper ...
...dership. The
peasants resistance continued to be a predominant problem for all
rulers when attempting to enforce new agricultural ideology, however
the sources only support the question to a slight extent due to lack
of evidence. The main factor of the failure of the agricultural
reforms was the inability of the rulers to meet the peasants needs and
compromise with them to realise their contribution to the success of
their plans. All of the sources show consistant failure, however the
extent of the failure depends on each source, and the sources show
higher incidents of agricultural failure rather than peasants
resistance. Although all of the sources are helpfull, their
reliability is limited and therefore more sources must be analysed to
discover the extent of the peasants resistance and the agricultural
failures.
Tsarist Rule vs. Communist Regime in Russia From 1856-1917, up until a communist takeover, the USSR had three. Tsarist rulers, Alexander II (the Reformer 1855-1881), Alexander III. (the reactionary Tsar 1881-1894) and Nicholas (1894-1917). After the February Revolution of 1917, Lenin took control forcibly through the Civil War, but died in 1924. After several years of fighting opposition, Stalin took power in the late 1920's after antagonism from the.
In the years leading up to World War I, social unrest among the Russian people was spreading rapidly. There was a huge social gulf between the peasants who were former serfs and the landowners. The peasants regarded anyone who did not work as a parasite. They had always regarded as all land belonging to them. They regarded any land retained by the landowners at the time serfs were freed as stolen and only force could prevent them from taking it back. By the time Russia entered the war, one peasant rebellion had already been suppressed and several socialist revolutionary movements were developing.
No war is fought without the struggle for resources, and with Russia still rapidly lagging behind in the international industrialisation race by the turn of the 20th century, the stage was set for social unrest and uprising against its already uncoordinated and temporally displaced government. With inconceivable demands for soldiers, cavalry and warfare paraphernalia, Russia stood little chance in the face of the great powers of World War One. Shortages of basic human necessities led to countless subsistence riots and the eventual power struggle between the ruling body and its people. From the beginnings of WWI to 1916, prices of essential goods rose 131 percent in Moscow and more than 150 percent in Petrograd. Additionally, historian Walter G. Moss stated that in September 1915 that “there were 100,000 strikers in Russia; in October 1916, there were 250,000 in Petrograd alone.” Moss continues to exemplify the increasing evidence of social unrest and connects the riots to a lack of resources when he goes on to point out that “subsistence riots protesting high prices and shortages… also increased.” ...
While most of Europe had develop strong central governments and weakened the power of the nobles, Russia had lagged behind the times and still had serfs as late as 1861. The economic development that followed the emancipation of peasants in the rest of Europe created strong industrial and tax bases in those nations. Russian monarchs had attempted some level of reforms to address this inequality for almost a century before, and were indeed on their way to “economic maturity” (32) on par with the rest of Europe. But they overextended themselves and the crushing defeats of the Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and the First World War in 1917 lost them the necessary support from their subjects and created “high prices and scarcity” which were by far “the most obvious factors in the general tension”
The Effect of the Bolshevik Rule on Russian Culture Bolshevik cultural policy was based on spreading their values to the population. They attempted to promote equality to create a classless society. In addition to removing class differences they attempted to give equal status to women and to young people. In order to encourage women to work state funded crèches were established and laws passed to give women parity in terms of pay with men. The state tried to destroy the old concept of families by legalising abortion and enabling people to obtain divorces much more simply.
Viola, Lynne. 1996. Peasant Rebels under Stalin : Collectivization and the Culture of Peasant Resistance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
During the year of 1861, Alexander II official issued the Edict of Emancipation, this freed over 20 million serfs. Looking back to the times of 1820, many of the Russians believed in abolishing serfdom. Despite this, the czars and nobles were reluctantly against it. You can imagine going back to the current time in 1861, after having serfdom for countless years, some Russians would be unwilling to change the system now. Unfortunately, his reform regarding serfdom only went halfway. Instead, peasant communities received about half of the farmland in the country, and the nobles were to keep the other half. The government then paid the nobles for their farmland. On the other side, the peasant communities had 49 years to pay the government for their land. Although, the reform had made the serfs free, the debt still remained which tied them to the land.
on or not. It is impossible to say how much effect the war had of the
The famine in Russia alone led the peasants to become angry and fed up with the Russian government, suggesting a future revolution. Because of the peasants’ unrest, they began to break the law by as stealing food for their families and shouting in the streets. Russia had attempted revolution before, and a fear of an uprising was feared again. Their everyday routi...
Arguing that Stolypin was Successful in His Plan to Modernize Russian Agriculture During the time of Nicholas the second, the government was losing all control, the smell of revolution was in the air, the Tsar was under immense pressure not only from the citizens but from the army. In 1906 Pyotr (Peter) Stolypin was given power, as the new Prime Minister of Russia. He realized that reform was essential if autocracy was to survive.
government as it supported a system that kept the huge majority of Russian people in misery”
Wood, A. (1986). The Russian Revolution. Seminar Studies in History. (2) Longman, p 1-98. ISBSN 0582355591, 9780582355590
The Similarities of Tsarist and Communist Rule in Russia Both forms of government did depend on high degree of central control. However, some Tsars and Stalin exerted more central controls than others. Stalin’s stronger use of central control created differences between the two forms of government. The Tsars used different levels of central control.
Riasanovsky, Nicholas V., and Mark D. Steinberg. A History of Russia. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford, 2005. Print.
The Conditions for Workers and Peasants Under the Bolsheviks and Under the Tsar's Rule Conditions for workers and peasants were deplorable under the rule of the Tsars, but not to the extent they were under the Bolsheviks. Despite the Bolsheviks claiming their policies were entirely in favour of the proletariat, peasants were forced to face horrific famine and a vast decline in living standards under rule by Lenin and the Bolsheviks. When Alexander II came to power in 1855 he realised that in order to modernise Russia and improve the weakening economy he needed to make dramatic reforms. In 1861 Alexander issued his Emancipation Manifesto, proposing 17 legislative acts that would free the serfs in Russia. Even though this new-found freedom in some ways seemed to place a greater burden on the peasants due to heavy redemption payments on their land and little improvement regarding agricultural methods in Russia, the act made the now-freed serfs feel that progress was being made towards a fairer social system in Russia and gave them some hope for more affirmative reforms in the future.