Roman Sports
I chose Roman sport because there are many Roman sports all of which
are very interesting. For example chariot racing a violent but
exciting sport. From the name you would imagine a horse and chariot
going round and round a course but it was more than that : they rammed
each other hoping to smash the other racer's chariot. In each lap you
never knew what might happen. I also chose roman sport because I think
gladiatorial fights would have been amazing to see and I know quite a
lot of information on them. Due to my interests in the fights I have
watched many documentaries and read many books on them.
The sports I will write about are gladiatorial fights and chariot
racing. In both I will be discussing the rewards, the dangers, which
people were involved, the many different participants, the equipment
involved and the popularity of each. I will also compare them to
modern sports.
Chariot racing
Stadium
Chariot races were held in places called circuses which they were
called
because of their oval shape. The Circus Maximus was one of the
biggest.
The building was by the time of Emperor Augustus 620 metres long and
140 to 150 metres at its widest point. The fact that it was built in a
valley stretching between two hills gives you an idea of its size. At
first there were no buildings, just a rough sandy track with
provisional markers. The viewers of the races had to sit on the hills
on each side of the track. Eventually as popularity rose they
developed it into a larger venue as can be seen today. It could seat
approximately 150 000 viewers while modern racing venues can support
up to 300 000 sp...
... middle of paper ...
...a gladiator because
many civilians joined just so they could become famous in Rome. There
is a lot of graffiti in Rome saying how much they liked certain
warriors and there is lots of writing from girls who are writing about
their heartthrobs. In modern times we have boxing matches and
wrestling matches which are both less violent than gladiator fights
but shows that sports with violence are still popular although people
don't like to think so.
Conclusion
I have found out a lot of things I didn’t know: for example that there
were another seven types of gladiator I had never heard of before as
only recently has evidence of their existence been found, how
fanatical people could get about the sports and how many animals were
killed in total. I have found writing this to be more interesting than
I had expected.
Rome fell in the year 476 when Rome’s last emperor was overthrown. This downfall of the Roman empire was coming for years. Rome fell because of barbarian invasions, weak military, and economic issues.
Question : Who were the spectators at Roman games? Discuss the relationship between them and the performers they watched.
Gladiatorial events were a token of the Roman civilization. A brutal form of sacrifice adapted from the earlier civilization of Etruscans, who believed when a person dies, his spirit relies on a blood sacrifice to survive in the afterlife. The first event to take place in Rome was in 264 BC, when Decimus Brutus held a sacrifice to honor his dead father (Roman Gladiator). Soon after these events became an undeniable part of the Romans lives, used for political power and general entertainment.
a chariot racing or gladiatorial event in Rome . It was “imperial policy to occupy the populace as much as possible with games, that their minds be kept off their lost political liberties” . The games kept the minds of the citizens occupied and it served to keep the gossip in the streets of the Roman Empire from turning to politics. In the streets of the Roman Empire, the populace stuck to talking of the Roman games, as talk of politics could result in a punishment as harsh as death. The Emperors in Rome employed spies, and informers that would turn any citizen in for talking of politics. They even went so far as to employ individuals who would intentionally break the law in order to induce others into breaking the law so that they could be
seating and the easiest access to the Colosseum. Even though many people think that the
The strength of the Roman military was the string that held the Roman Empire together for as long as it lasted. The military was made up of strictly disciplined men whom were ready and willing to serve their emperor.
Hearts pounding with sword, and shield in hand dripping blood, and covered in dust. Men
Every empire, dynasty, government, regime etc. has consisted of both good and bad leadership. This directly affects the society in which they oversee and/or control. The infamous Roman Empire experienced its share of triumphs and depression through its leader’s actions. Run as a monarchy, the kings of Rome had various ways of implementing their authority. Many of them chose to rule based on their interests and desires while others catered to the welfare of Rome’s booming population. Depending on the leader some received accolades and others faced a tragic ending due to their ignorance. Prior to the formation of the republic Rome the people endured both the spoils and hardships of war. The actions and/or qualities of the good and bad leaders of Rome had a direct correlation with its well being. Opinions vary but there were definitely standouts on both ends of the spectrum.
this project I aim to show how two parts of the Roman army: a) its
Rome was known for many things, one of the biggest things that they are very skilled in, is warfare. Romans were very skilled in this area, they were known to have great fighting techniques. They would hardly ever lose a war. They were very smart during battle. One of the techniques that they used was that they would fight on higher grounds against their enemies in order to have a height advantage. Of course, they would only do this when the battle was in their territory. Another great technique that they had was making sure that the sun was behind them and that the wind was also behind them. How smart is that? They used many other ways to confuse the enemy. Rome was in a lot of wars.
The Roman Republic began in 509 B.C.E. with the overthrow of the Etruscan monarchy. In 27 B.C.E the Roman Empire began with Octavian Caesar becoming the emperor, this ended almost 500 years of republican self-government. There is much debate over why Rome became so powerful so quickly. Many think it had to do with Rome’s military strength. Others think that it was because Rome knew of and controlled most of the trade routes. Still others believed it had to do with the technology that was advanced during the Roman Republic. All of these factors played significant roles, but which one played the most important role?
Throughout history, no other era was more significant than that of the Roman Empire. The power and influence of the Roman government and it=s rule over the world was accomplished by the Roman Army. The Roman army was the ultimate weapon of war because of the well trained men, their effective weapons and their brilliant battle tactics.
The Roman Republic began approximately around 509 B.C. when the nobles drove the King and his family out of Rome. This monumental incident helped shape the start to the transformation of the monarchy into a republican governmental system. This is known to have begun by that of the Roman nobles trying to hold their power that they had gained. The Republic was “[a] city-state [which] was the foundation of Greek society in the Hellenic Age; in the Hellenistic Age, Greek cities became subordinate to kingdoms, larder political units ruled by autocratic monarchs” (Perry 105)
With the decline and fall of the western empire, the classical age of Rome came to a close as disease, warfare and corruption conspired to bring about the downfall of an ailing empire that had once conquered the known world. Where once enlightened despots had ruled a debauched and unwieldy polity, now barbarians stood over the ruins of a once thriving metropolis. In its absence a new world would arise with new values and ideals. Turning their back on a pagan past the Christian children of these wild men from the north would spawn the greatest houses of future European nobility, and when they looked back for a legacy, they would not see their ancestors as pillagers picking at the bones of a defiled Rome, but instead as its trusted guardians, partnering with the Church to carry her legacy through the “Dark Ages”.
The society of the ancient Romans has often been considered the bases for our modern society. When one thinks of the Roman society, pictures of grand villa's and of senators wearing Toga's come to mind. Also, Roman society is often associated with great feasts and extravagance among the rich. There is more to Rome, however, then these symbols and the Classical Roman society is one with a complicated history that covers the history of the ancient city and involves the family, the home, education and much more. The social structure of ancient Rome was based on heredity, property, wealth, citizenship and freedom. It was also based around men: women were defined by the social status of their fathers or husbands. Women were expected to look after the houses and very few had any real independence.