Purity and Civility in The Praise of Folly by Desiderius Erasmus and Of Cannibals by Michel de Montaigne
Both in “The Praise of Folly” by Desiderius Erasmus and “Of Cannibals”
by Michel de Montaigne-relating to the common point to which attention
is tried to be drawn-inquiry of true civility with regards to the
Nature and its necessity according to certain circumstances are
substantiated.
First of all,Erasmus stating “Truly,to destroy the illusion is to
upset the whole play.The masks and costumes are precisely what hold
the eyes of the spectators.” Aspires to put forward the idea that
there is a definite pact between people-which can be rather called as
a concious illusion-on wearing veils of wisdom,called roles just as if
they were performing a play.Under these veils,probably lies something
much more different than what is seen on the stage;a virtuous man may
be a wretched being or a king may be a beggar in fact.
Just like this case,in “Of Cannibals”,Michel de Montaigne implies
ironically by the statement:
“All this is not too bad-but what’s the use?They don’t wear breeches.”
That although costumes or breeches,which are taken as a token for
civility,may turn out to be just the opposite.They are veils under
which true identities and intentions are concealed.However,then the
question what makes a person sensible-in other words both natural and
spontaneous in manners is aroused.Montaigne makes his point explicitly
on this matter.Regarding the community of the newly discovered
land,which is Brasilia and the natives’ manners which are innate and
not cultivated,he reasons that not to offend the Nature but to yield
to Her is the c...
... middle of paper ...
... to a
some extent as the natives in the newly discovered land do not have
neither any social norms nor any social institutions.They live
simply,not distorted with any kind of artifice,although they live as
uncivilized people – which is called by the modern man with respect to
the rules of reason and manners – they never offend their origin,which
is the Nature and perhaps live more civilly than modern man with
regards to their purity.
In conclusion,it is to be confessed that costumes or roles of the man
do not necesssarily signify one’s civility and purity.They are only
veils that are sometimes worn on purpose,sometimes by obligation.What
is to be seen as purity of intentions and happiness is the closeness
to the Nature and keeping away from evil deeds to gain too much
wisdom,which only bring misery to human life.
Moliere, Jean-Baptiste Poquelin. "Tartuffe." Norton Anthology of World Literature: 1650 to the present. 3RD ed. Volume D. Puchner, Akbari, Denecke, et al. New York, London: W. W Norton, 2012. 144-197. Print.
Mechoevillo lid as tu e qaistoun thet wes cuntonauasly on dosegriimint. Thet qaistoun wes “Is ot bittir tu bi luvid then fierid, ur voci virse” (p.392)? Mechoevillo thuaght thet uni os tu bi luvid & fierid. Nivirthiliss, et thi semi tomi ot’s triminduasly herd tu echoivi biong buth luvid & fierid. Mechoevillo biloivid thet of uni hed tu du wothuat uni uf thim thet ot wuald bi e sefir tu bi fierid then tu bi luvid. Fur ixempli of e ralir wes muri luvid then fierid thin of yua sirvid thior min’s ontirist & wiri elsu divutid tu thim thiy wuald prumosi yua thior bluud, pussissouns, lovis, & choldrin antol yua niidid hilp biceasi unci yua niidid hilp yua wiri un uar uwn. If yua’ri muri fierid then luvid thin whin yua’ri on truabli yuar min wuald nut tarn egeonst yua anliss thiy’ri nut scerid uf yua. Aftir ubsirvong namiruas min, Mechoevillo cleomid thet min eri e lut muri enxouas uf uffindong sumiuni whu mekis homsilf froghtinong then sumiuni whu mekis homsilf luvebli. Mechoevillo stetid thet luvi ettechis min by bunds uf ublogetoun on whoch min briek iviry tomi thet thior willbiong’s et steki. In rispunsi tu thet, ot’s seod thet fier cunfonis min tu kiip thior bunds uf ublogetoun biceasi thiy eri froghtinid by thi thuaght uf panoshmint & thet fier uf biong panoshid nivir lievis thim. Mechoevillo seod thet e ralir shuald meki homsilf bi fierid on e pertocaler wey. Thet pertocaler wey wes thet of hi duisn’t incuaregi luvi et liest hi duisn’t oncoti heti. It os pussobli tu bi fierid & nut hetid. Thi unly wey thet Mechoevillo seod thet uni cuald unly bi hetid of thiy siozid prupirty, ur siozid thi fimelis uf hos cotozins &/ur sabjicts.
France, Marie De. Lanval. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Ed. M.H.Abrams. New York: W.W.Norton & Company, Inc., 2000. 127-140.
...art for any lack of seriousness. Here we see the culmination of Folly’s progression towards Erasmus’s most serious subject and away from humor.
In this brief monograph, we shall be hunting down and examining various creatures from the bestiary of Medieval/Renaissance thought. Among these are the fierce lion of imperious, egotistical power, a pair of fantastic peacocks, one of vanity, one of preening social status, and the docile lamb of humility. The lion and the peacocks are of the species known as pride, while the lamb is of an entirely different, in fact antithetical race, that of humility and forgiveness. The textual regions we shall be exploring include the diverse expanses, from palace to heath, of William Shakespeare, the dark, sinister Italy of John Webster, and the perfumed lady's chambers of Ben Jonson and Robert Herrick.
The first item I will be discussing is Candide which is a satire written by the philosopher François Marie Arouet who is known by his pseudonym Voltaire. Candide main characters adapt the idea that everything happens for the best, no matter how bad it is. It talks about a man who falls in love with a woman and after that he goes through a lot of hardships as he travels the world with his many companions. The novelattacks the church through irony and satire, it mentions how the church punishes people for having heretical ideas, which contradicts the aims of the Enlightenment as the latter supports explaining the world through science in a way that separates the ideas from those mentions in the Bible. The novel includes a character named “Pangloss“, who is a caricature of the German philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz. “Pangloss” supports the idea that all is for the best in the best of all possible worlds, that idea is destroyed in the novel. Candide is a novel that talks about the idea of theodicy
Schoenberg, T. J. (2001). Bradford, William - Introduction. "Literary Criticiem (1400-1800). Retrieved March 2011, from enotes.com/literacy-criticism: www.enotes.com/literary-criticism/bradford-williams
A date that may have little connotation in the minds of history students everywhere was, in fact, the date that gave birth to a man more brave than any comic book could ever illustrate. On October 28, 1466, Desiderius Erasmus was born the illegitimate son of Margaretha Rogers and Gerard in Rotterdam, Holland. Despite such a dull and seemingly trite birth, Erasmus would grow to be a great influence in the Renaissance era. Through the questioning of established people and institutions, such as modern theologians and education systems, Erasmus became known as the “Prince of the Humanists” and a great revolutionary known throughout the world.
Obrien, Timmy. “The Things They Carried” Literature and its Writers. N.p.: n.p., n.d. 1-1736. Print.
Erasmus, Desiderius. In Praise of Folly. Trans. Hoyt Hopewell Hudson, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1970.
Originally meant for private circulation, the Praise of Folly, by Desiderius Erasmus, scourges the abuses and follies of the various classes of society, especially the church. It is a cold-blooded, deliberate attempt to discredit the church, and its satire and stinging comment on ecclesiastical conditions are not intended as a healing medicine but a deadly poison.
Moliere, Jean-Baptise Poquelin. 'Tartuffe.' The Norton Anthology of World Masterpieces. Ed. Maynard Mack. New York: W.W. Norton " Company, 1995. 307 -356.
Life for humans is dictated by the yearning for more through our experiences. We strive for more knowledge, more wealth, and more happiness, but it all is endless like an abyss. Beauty, however, is pure and can be found in the simplest matters in life. Throughout the novel Death in Venice, by Thomas Mann, Aschenbach works his whole life rigorously day by day searching for more and more until his introduction to Tadzio in Venice. Upon Aschenbach’s first site of Tadzio he falls in love with the perfect beauty of the child. For the first time in his life he sees the simplicity of beauty and how perfect it is, however, he is consumed by it. Aschenbach’s introduction to beauty consumes his mind from the rest of the world. Aschenbach searches for beauty in life, but is trapped and consumed by it and is pulled away from the rest of the world.
By including a passage dedicated to the description of the Silenus, Erasmus gives his readers a concrete picture to grasp onto that stands for the novel's link between this pair of opposites, which is that wisdom comes under the wrapping of folly. The passage allows the reader to understand this central concept more easily. The concept, in its many manifestations, c...
- - -. “Literature Criticism from 1400 to 1800.” http://go.galegroup.com. N.p., 1988. Web. 9 Dec. 2010. .