Preview
Preview

Famine, Affluence, and Morality Essay

No Works Cited
Length: 1367 words (3.9 double-spaced pages)
Rating: Purple      
Open Document
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Famine, Affluence, and Morality


Webster's English Dictionary defines "morality" as: the conformity to ideals of right human conduct. With this in mind, I wonder who determines right human conduct? Religion aside, there is no literary context that strictly states the rights and wrongs of human behavior. So who decides? Who determines what we ought morally to do and what we are obligated to do as a society? An Australian philosopher, Peter Singer attempts to draw the line between obligation and charity with the moral incentives to providing food for the starved in East Bengal. Although he presents many sound arguments, the reality of his utopian world is that it cannot exist. In the following expository, I will justify my reasoning behind this fact.
To discourse a charitable act is generally viewed as a philanthropic gesture, one that stems from a kind and worldly human being. However, if one has the resources to donate to a charitable cause, are they obligated to do so? Singer claims "if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it." (page 151) If true, everyone who has ever had the funds and opportunity to help a charitable cause but didn't, has neglected the welfare of the human race. Singer claims that generally speaking, "people
have not given large sums of money to relief funds; they have not written to their parliamentary representatives demanding increased government assistance, they have not demonstrated in the streets, held symbolic fasts, or done anything else directed toward providing the refugees with the means to satisfy their essential needs." With all respect to Mr. Singer, I beg to differ....


... middle of paper ...


...they were in no way obligated to do so, the likelihood of murder would not be as popular. With this in mind, any attempt to force moral obligation would end in failure. People care most about priorities. What must be done now and what directly follows that. If one were to decide upon which choice to follow, I should hope they would choose the first, being not to commit an act of murder. In conclusion, the utopian world that Singer produces is not achievable. Unless he wishes for all of human kind to conform and follow a universal set of codes and laws, the moral obligations of each person shall remain inevitably different. Therefore, his world cannot exist, as stated in my thesis. In no way will every human being abide to the same moral logic and hence, adhere to his "giving to charity" master plan. It proves to be an idealistic world, but unattainable at best.


Click the button above to view the complete essay, speech, term paper, or research paper








This essay is 100% guaranteed.


Title Length Color Rating  
Essay about Famine, Affluence and Morality by Pete Singer - ... (Singer, 232). I agree with his point and feel as if even though many people do agree with him, not many people will or do put it into practice. Singer emphasizes through his article on the main fact that distance is not a reason to fail in doing what is morally right. He suggests that if people acted out their principles and helped people in places such as East Bengal, then our world would be fundamentally changed. I will first explain what the duty to relieve suffering is. The word suffering is often used in either a psychological sense, or in an objectivist sense such as being misfortunate....   [tags: article review and analysis] 1060 words
(3 pages)
Research Papers [preview]
Essay on Famine, Affluence and Morality by Peter Singers - In this essay I will be arguing why a utilitarian could possibly disagree with Peter Singers Argument presented in “Famine, Affluence and Morality.” After reading such an interesting paper I must say as much as I disagreed with Singers viewpoints I almost found it difficult to object them with support. From a utilitarian point of view we are to maximize Happiness by reducing suffering. How can Giving possible make someone unhappy. But as I was thinking a saying came across my mind, “Two steps forward one step back”....   [tags: utilitarian, philosophy, happiness]
:: 1 Works Cited
939 words
(2.7 pages)
Better Essays [preview]
Essay on Famine, Affluence and Morality by Peter Singer - ... My personal answer to the previous argument, could very well fit this argument too. Now that I have explained why the premises are true, let me explain how the conclusion is false. Singer suggests a noble conclusion, but it will only work for a short time period and will not solve the real issues that are in place. These could be the policies that have been implemented from the very first moment any city could have been created, that keep the rich, rich and the poor people, poor. Historically speaking, the policies started years ago when Europe, the Spanish in particular, started to dominate the New World....   [tags: essay analysis] 1498 words
(4.3 pages)
Research Papers [preview]
The Problem of Poverty in Famine, Affluence, and Morality by Peter Singer - Peter Singer is often regarded as one of the most productive and influential philosophers of modern times. He is well-known for his discussions of the acute social, economic, and political issues, including poverty and famines. In his “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, Singer (1972) discusses the problem of poverty and hunger, as well as the way this problem is treated in the developed world. Singer believes that charity is inseparable from morality, and no distinction can be drawn between charity and duty....   [tags: charity, philosophy, duty]
:: 1 Works Cited
1102 words
(3.1 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Peter Singer's Paper 'Famine, Affluence and Morality' - Peter Singer's paper “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”has made a drastic impact in modern applied ethics. The simple nature of the paper makes for an easy read, yet the point clearly set out by Singer is at ends with the targeted audiences' popular beliefs. Although most will object to Singer's idea by throwing away a basic principle of most moral theories, I wish to deny Singer's solution by showing that the ability to apply Singer's conclusion is not reasonable and does not address the problem's core....   [tags: on poverty and action] 1498 words
(4.3 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Essay about Peter Singer's Argument in Famine, Affluence and Morality - This paper explores Peter Singer’s argument, in Famine, Affluence, and Morality, that we have morally required obligations to those in need. The explanation of his argument and conclusion, if accepted, would dictate changes to our lifestyle as well as our conceptions of duty and charity, and would be particularly demanding of the affluent. In response to the central case presented by Singer, John Kekes offers his version, which he labels the and points out some objections. Revisions of the principle provide some response to the objections, but raise additional problems....   [tags: morally required obligations to those in need]
:: 2 Works Cited
1493 words
(4.3 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Essay Famine, Affluence, and Morality - “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”      In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer is trying to argue that “the way people in relatively affluent countries react to a situation… cannot be justified; indeed,… our moral conceptual scheme needs to be altered and with it, the way of life that has come to be taken for granted in our society”(Singer 230). Peter Singer provides striking examples to show the reader how realistic his arguments are. In this paper, I will briefly give a summary of Peter Singer’s argument and the assumptions that follow, adding personal opinions for or against Peter’s statements....   [tags: Peter Singer]
:: 1 Works Cited
2018 words
(5.8 pages)
Powerful Essays [preview]
Famine, Affluence, and Morality Essay - Famine, Affluence, and Morality Webster's English Dictionary defines "morality" as: the conformity to ideals of right human conduct. With this in mind, I wonder who determines right human conduct. Religion aside, there is no literary context that strictly states the rights and wrongs of human behavior. So who decides. Who determines what we ought morally to do and what we are obligated to do as a society. An Australian philosopher, Peter Singer attempts to draw the line between obligation and charity with the moral incentives to providing food for the starved in East Bengal....   [tags: Papers] 1367 words
(3.9 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]
Famine Relief Essay - In response to the recent failure of the international community to prevent the famine crisis in the Horn of Africa since July 2011, Suzanne Dvorak the chief executive of Save the Children wrote that, “We need to provide help now. But we cannot forget that these children are wasting away in a disaster that we could - and should - have prevented” she added, “The UN estimates that every $1 spent in prevention saves $7 in emergency spending.” (Dvorak, 2011). Many people who read such statement wonder about our obligation towards famine relief, and ask, whether we are morally obliged to spend one dollar in order to prevent such a crisis or not....   [tags: Article Analysis ]
:: 7 Works Cited
1822 words
(5.2 pages)
Term Papers [preview]
Essay Morality of Giving - How much money is one morally obligated to give to relief overseas. Many In people would say that although it is a good thing to do, one is not obligated to give anything. Other people would say that if a person has more than he needs, then he should donate a portion of what he has. Peter Singer, however, proposes a radically different view. His essay, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” focuses on the Bengal crisis in 1971 and claims that one is morally obligated to give as much as possible. His thesis supports the idea that “We ought to give until we reach the level of marginal utility – that is, the level at which, by giving more, I would cause as much suffering to myself or my dependents...   [tags: Article Analysis ]
:: 2 Works Cited
1069 words
(3.1 pages)
Strong Essays [preview]