The General Strike and How Revolutionary It Was

604 Words2 Pages

The General Strike and How Revolutionary It Was Seventy eight years ago an earthquake shook the very foundations of British capitalism. In the greatest display of militant power in its history the British working class moved into action in the General Strike of May 1926. For 9 days not a wheel turned nor a light shone without the permission of the working class. In this essay I argue that it was not revolutionary or better it was not designed to be revolutionary. From one minute to midnight on Monday 3 May, the TUC called out the railwaymen, dockers, road transport workers, printers and gas and electricity workers. Engineering and ship-building workers were asked to strike a week later. In all, some 80 unions were affected and about two and a half million men and women went on strike, in addition to the miners. Although the response to the strike was not uniform throughout the country, the degree of worker solidarity shown was very remarkable. The General Strike was in fact the most complete stoppage in British history. The TUC, however, did not call for a universal strike. Workers in the health and sanitary services were excluded from the strike call, as were those who transported food. It was also hoped -naively - that power workers, while cutting off the supply of heat, would be able to maintain lighting. Therefore the TUC actually tried to minimise the inconvenience to the general public. The term 'general strike' was not used. Instead the TUC preferred calling it a national strike. Having entered the strike very reluctantly, the General Council was anxious to show that it was not revolutionary and that it was involv... ... middle of paper ... ...t that they were merely supporting the miners in a just cause, the fact was that their action was designed to coerce not the owners but the government. It was easy therefore, to present the General Strike as a contest between an elected government and a trade union organisation that did not represent the mass of the people. The General Strike was therefore presented to be revolutionary and admittedly in seemed that if it would last longer, and power would slip away from the TUC, indeed it might have developed into a real revolution. However, the actual aim of the strike, from the general council's point of view, was absolutely not revolutionary. There is no evidence that they were planning to overthrow the government and in the British Workers all their articles argued that they were not challenging the Constitution.

Open Document