The Importance of the Fight Scene in William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet
1Introduction
The fight scene in "Romeo and Juliet" is a very important set piece.
This scene is very much used be "William Shakespeare" as a way to
connect to the reader viewing it. He tries to allow the reader to have
mixed emotions. Some of the emotions the fight set piece is trying to
display are Hate, Horror, Excitement, fear and tension. The reason why
the reader feels these emotions are because there are many points in
the fight scenes where the main character could have and almost does
get killed.
The context of this set piece is very much heading towards the
dramatic time in which "William Shakespeare" wrote "Romeo and Juliet"
(1595). This is because the why that all the characters would carry
swords around with them and it was seen as the norm. There are many
things that make us accept this. One is the way that Mercutio calls
his sword a "Fiddlestick".
The main reasons which make us anticipate the fight between Tybalt and
Romeo; one thing is that Mercutio shouts before he dies:
A plague on both your houses.
Three times and this really changes the mood of the scene. Also Tybalt
returns and taunts Romeo about Mercutio's death.
2"William Shakespeare" sets this scene at the beginning to really
make the reader sense that there is going to be s fight of some sort
between the Montague and Capulet. He does this by having the
characters saying things like:
And if we meet, we shall not 'scape a brawl
For now, these hot days, is the mad blood stirring
This concludes to us that Benvolio is anticipating a fight. But
Mercutio se...
... middle of paper ...
...ene is very good at
illustrating the Conflict between the two families, in how when the
arguing is going on the stand on their own side never, near the
others.
The main themes that can be used to describe are Terror, Tragedy and
action with excitement. Mainly because of all the fighting and killing
which all adds you to what the scene represents.
After the moment when Romeo kills Tybalt the reader braces themselves
for what is going to happen after. At the time the reader is most
likely to believe that Romeo will be executed because of the fighting.
Because earlier on in the story the prince says
If you ever disturb our streets again,
Your lives shall pay the forfeit of the peace,
But never the less the prince decides not to punish Romeo by death but
banish him so the reader does feel relived at this.
William Shakespeare's Use of Conflict in Act 1 Scene 5 of Romeo and Juliet. I believe conflict has a number of different meanings, like a fight or perhaps a feud, or maybe even just an everyday argument. But also it could be referred to as a clash, not as a physical clash but a clash. of two different things completely opposite coming together.
A promise of confidentiality assures clients that information revealed during counseling will not be shared with others without permission. An individual has the right to choose the time, circumstances, and extent, to which he or she wishes to share or withhold information. Marriage and family therapist have different confidentiality aspects from other counseling areas. Marriage and family therapist mostly have more than one client in a therapeutic relationship, there are different limitations for each individual client. AAMFT Standard II (2015 2.2) states When providing couple, family or group treatment, the therapist does not disclose information outside the treatment context without a written authorization from each individual competent to execute a waiver. Conclusively, counselors may be counseling a couple, group, or family for treatment, each client has their own rights to privacy protection and confidentiality. All counselors must follow specific guidelines when in regards to disclosing information that has potential harm to the client or identified others. If court ordered or third party payers have requested information it is the counselors job to obtain written consent from the client to release information about that
An example is when a person threatens to transmit HIV and other diseases. It may be illegal in many countries for a person to infect other people with a disease knowingly especially HIV. However, a clinical psychologist should not be obligated to tell the other people of the risk of transmission. The client has a right to confidentiality. Duty to warn got developed when Tarasoff got murdered by a person who had threatened to do so. He had told the therapist that one day he would murder her, but the therapist protected the client’s confidentiality. When Tarasoff got killed in 1976, her parents went to court to report the Regents of the University of California. Another case was Jabloski by Pahls v. US. This case extended the duty to warn when it included reviewing history to detect history of violence. Jabloski had a history of violence that got discovered through an assessment by the doctors. Since the doctor failed to notify his girlfriend Kimbal, She got killed by him when Jabloski got released from the hospital (Cherry 2014).
Though touching your patient and having multiple relationships with them aren’t the best way to go in my opinion, disclosing information to your patients is extremely beneficial. All therapists should learn to provide trust, comfort and an understanding to their patients, otherwise they are doing their job all wrong.
They argue that therapists should consider their own motivation to self-disclose and set boundaries. The therapists should never put their own needs above the client. They make sure to point out that self discourse alone cannot affect the outcome of treatment. Self-disclosure is effective only if it is used appropriately and only if it is used when it is necessary. The amount of information disclosed and when it is disclosed is also important. Therapists should draw a clear line with the amount of intimacy to include in their therapeutic disclosure to ensure that no inappropriate boundaries are crossed. The authors suggest two rules of thumb to follow when disclosing information which include: (a) “Why do I want to say what I am about to say” and (b) “What will be the likely impact of the client” (p. 567).
Without exception, confidentiality trumps duty to warn, court rules (2004). Mental Health Law Report, 22 (6), 53. Retrieved from http://find.galegroup.com/gtx/infomark.do?&contentSet=IAC-Documents&type=retrieve&tabID=T003&prodId=GRCM&docId=A120474886&source=gale&userGroupName=clemson_itweb&version=1.0
Cross and Sim (2000) cite Reid (1981) who defines confidentiality as “ the principle of maintaining the security of information elicited from an individual in the privileged circumstances of a professional relationship”. It has been highlighted by the Health Care Professional Council (HCPC, 2012) that when working in healthcare and dealing with personal information regarding patients, it is every health professionals role to ensure that information is handled correctly and kept safe. If for any reason personal information is required to be shared or passed on then the patient should provide informed consent (HCPC, 2012). The HCPC (2012) also note that if confidentiality is broken this may affect the care and patient relationship and result in patients being reluctant to share information important to their proper care.
...confidential information is shared without their permission, this situation can be detrimental to the client. The client may stop treatment or be passive-aggressive towards the therapist by being late of cancelling appointments with the clinician.
The expectation in the practitioner/client relationship is that any information disclosed will not be shared with others. Confidentiality is emphasized to provide the client with a safe haven in which to share traumatic events or embarrassing personal information about themselves (Krase, 2013). Disclosing this type of sensitive information...
Imagine living in a state where one is providing service to a client and the client divulged that he admits to wanting to end his ex-girlfriends life but one lives in a state where there is no duty to warn. What does one do in a situation like this? This question comes about due to the Tarasoff v. The University of California Board of Regents case as well as the fact that there is no uniformity in the United States over duty to warn or protect. Some states have permissive statutes while some have an established mandatory duty to warn while very few have no statute at all. According to Doverspike (2007), the APA standard is permissive ("may disclose") rather than mandatory ("shall disclose"). The APA Code of Ethics 4.05 part 3 states that disclosures without consent are is only allowed when mandated by law to protect the client, psychologist, or others from harm (Fisher, 2013, p. 346). How does one protect the confidentiality of a client but also protect others from potential harm? The Tarasoff v. The
...g with veracity include not only the basic expectation that we are honest in our professional interactions, but also in the area of informed consent. Counselors must be honest with clients concerning all areas of treatment, including the responsibilities for reporting certain information to parents or the authorities. The client must be made aware that counselors are accountable to the client, but legally as well.
Romeo and Juliet is a tragedy of an ancient feud where the children of two families at war fall deeply in love with each other. Set in the 16th century William Shakespeare’s play has many different themes running throughout it, which include love, hate, death and conflict. The play opens with a fight but ends with suicide that creates peace between both families who unite from their losses. The conflict, violence and aggression in the play happen from revenge and an ancient family grudge. An audience from the 16th century would have enjoyed Romeo and Juliet because of the real life drama and tragedy the play goes through. The patriarchal society gave women absolutely no rights and they had to obey their man’s ordering a patriarchal system. The theme of conflict is revealed as the characters argue over Juliet’s disobedience.
However, there are some cases that professionals have to rely on the Law. The Law is different from moral principles and Code of Ethics and its focus is on the legal perspective to protect the professional. The Law is defined by Remley and Herlihy (2010) as “general or specific regarding both what is required and what is allowed of individuals who from a governmental entity” (p.4). One major example is the Tarasoff and the Duty to Protect which is a law that was created after the case that happened with a university student, Tatiana Tarasoff and her boyfriend. Tarasoff’s parents sue the psychotherapists alleging that the professionals should have warned the student. Because of this case, the law raised a major concern that the confidentiality that professionals should follow according to the ACA and AMHCA Code of Ethics has to be broken when there is an issue that can affect a third party in the situation. Like the AMHCA refers to confidentiality as “a right granted to all clients of mental health counseling services. From the onset of the counseling relationship, mental health counselors inform clients of these rights inclu...
Exceptions to confidentiality include healthcare providers who care for a patient between one another regarding patient care and treatment. Another exception to breaching confidentiality includes mandatory reports. Mandatory reports are legislative requirements under the government authorities and may include any incident or knowledge of suspected neglect, physical or sexual abuse of children to the Child Protection Services, any maltreatment of dependent adults, or serious bodily injuries that are discovered related to the treatments of a
When some states require specific disclosure laws or guidelines. To establish in legal matters confidential moral responsibility for professional level of confidentiality. Abortion, the issue is required by state law, many states require parental notification. Doctor-patient confidentiality, from the English common law in many countries codification regulations. Doctors have a responsibility to warn patients who are threaten bodily harm people. Doctor-patient confidentiality is not absolute. Doctors must disclose personal information, it is clearly in the interests of the patient. Doctors can not pass moral judgment; they are here just to make sure your child has the best preventive care possible. Please note that when it comes to