Evaluation of Hannibal as a General
When Hannibal left Italy in 203 BC "he had filled Italy…with monuments
of his tremendous campaigns"[1]. In this essay I will consider
Hannibal's legacy and what aspects of his personality created these
'monuments.' After research,[2] I have set out some criteria of a
great general and in this essay I will attempt to establish to what
extent Hannibal fulfils these criteria. According to Lazenby, to do
what Hannibal did required "great strategic skill, tactical ingenuity
and sheer force of personality"[3]. I will consider where these
characteristics came from and how he used these characteristics to his
advantage in the Second Punic War.
After Hasdrubal was assassinated Hannibal became general of the
Carthaginian army in Spain. He had had an interesting upbringing as
the son of a popular war hero, Hamilcar. Hamilcar "led the boy
[Hannibal] to the altar and made him solemnly swear…that as soon as he
was old enough he would become an enemy of Rome"[4]. There was some
debate as to whether Hannibal should become commander at this young
age. However "the troops received him [Hannibal] with ominous
enthusiasm, the soldiers feeling that in the person of this young man
Hamilcar himself was restored to them…the same vigour in his look, the
same fire in his eyes"[5]. Indeed one of Hannibal's flaws was,
according to Caven, "his all consuming ambition to excel in all that
his father had taught him…the terrible game of war, the only
worthwhile occupation for a Barca"[6].
This 'game of war' was all about knowing how to be a good general, and
how to defeat the Romans. In my opinion a good general mus...
... middle of paper ...
...---------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] Titus Livius (Livy) XXX: 28
[2] An Encyclopaedia Britannica article entitled The Conduct and
Theory of War
[3] Lazenby, page 256
[4] Livy XXI: 1
[5] Livy XXI: 2
[6] Caven, page 86
[7] Polybius III: 17
* However, it was never Hannibal's plan to cross the Alps. This aspect
of the journey occurred because of Scipio's blocking of the normal
route.
[8] An Encyclopaedia Britannica article entitled The Conduct and
Theory of War
[9] Polybius III: 67
[10] Polybius III: 70
[11] Polybius III: 70
[12] Pamela Bradley, page 138
[13] Polybius III: 78
[14] Polybius III: 80
[15] Polybius III: 80
[16] Polybius III: 48
[17] Polybius III: 17
[18] Livy XXII: 51
[19] Poybius XV: 12
...ibly be experienced on the western front. Because of the training done in Britain, it made the battle of Geilenkirchen a success, due to the fact that all players were familiar with how each Army operated. By identifying the strengths that each Army had to offer, and employing them in the right situations, this also contributed to the success of the mission.
The value of war games in both the private and public sector is more clear to me now. I viewed most of the exercises I participated in as a relative waste of time and energy, which infrequently produces any substantive results. Now however, I see that it was I that made these exercises a waste of time because I did not fully appreciate the value of war gaming. Moreover, had I injected more thoughtful ideas and used these exercises as a learning tool there would have been a better plan for the future.
...uch information as possible before going into a conflict. The ability to get to know your enemy and figure out the scheme of maneuver is impressive.
“Psychopaths do not act like Hannibal Lector or Norman Bates. They come off like Hugh Grant, in his most adorable role.” Eric and Dylan are true psychopaths. Psychopaths develop in many different ways. Some hide their psychopathic ideals like Eric and Dylan.
notion that the war wasn’t going to be an easy win, and the chances of winning the war
Hannibal Buress shows us why he has gotten to where he is in the stand up comedy world with his material in his latest special Comedy Camisado (2015), but fails to do anything else to showcase his talents.
for historians and generals, and he is remembered as one of the most brilliant strategist
Phillip Pullman, a British author, once wrote, “I stopped believing there was a power of good and a power of evil that were outside us. And I came to believe that good and evil are names for what people do, not for what they are”(goodreads.com). Pullman’s quotation on the actions of man being the source of good and evil closely relate to morality, principles regarding the distinction of right and wrong or a person’s values. The question of what human morality truly is has been pondered by philosophers, common folk, and writers for thousands of years. However, sometimes a person’s ethics are unclear; he or she are not wholly good or bad but, rather, morally ambiguous. William Shakespeare, an English playwrite, heavily presses the topic moral ambiguity in his play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar. The titular character, Julius Caesar, is a morally equivocal character who serves a major purpose in the play.
Julius Caesar, an important figure in Roman history, lived during the end of the Roman Republic. His actions would shape the world around him forever. He was an important figure because he grew the Roman Empire, he brought about the end of the Roman Republic , and was able to grow his status within his lifetime and become dictator for life.
Looking at Caesar, he is highly successful in his military battles due to his great organisation skills and strategic planning. Caesar values organisation since he receives hourly reports on how matters are abroad (Act I Scene 4 lines 34-36) and keeps detailed accounts of his battles. His logical thought also makes him so successful:
Also it is comparing the war to a game, which is a euphemism as well as a metaphor. It is a euphemism because war is a very serious, dangerous matter; whereas a game is something that people enjoy and never get seriously injured in. By using this euphemism, Jessie Pope - the poet – lessens the severity of war, and makes her readers’ think of it as enjoyable, and something that they want to do.
For some time the Army has been using a certain expression to defines what an Army leader actually is. To keep it basic, the three words be, know and do explains it all!
would have seen war as a game where you can lose but retry until the
Mastering the fundamentals is a professional obligation and provides the basis by which Army leaders operate and demonstrate competence in a complex JIIM
Julius Caesar - A Comparison of Brutus and Cassius In the play Julius Caesar, written and performed by William Shakespeare, there are many characters, but two, Brutus and Cassius, stood out. The play begins in Rome, where a celebration of Julius Caesar's victory over the former ruler of Rome, Pompeii. The victory leads to Caesar's betrayal by his jealous companions. Senators and other high status figures are jealous of Caesar's new and growing power, while others, like Brutus, fear the tyrannical rule Caesar could enforce.