Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
how does the news media impact public opinion
journalism effect on politics
impact of journalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: how does the news media impact public opinion
"An American Attack on Iraq is Not Justified" was written by John E. Farley in 2002 when congress was considering a resolution to the 9-11 attacks. Farley is a professor of sociology at Southern Illinois University and still participates in war protests to this day. Farley's argument is exactly what the title states, a war in Iraq is not justifiable. The United States ultimately went to war against Iraq on March 19, 2003. Since then, the question of whether or not the war is ll, showing that he cares to inform everyone about the current situation.
Although Farley does not use outside sources in his article, he seems to be a reliable source who would be knowledgeable about the subject. In the introduction to the article it is prefaced that Farley is a professor of sociology, a subject which looks deeply into situations such as the one in Iraq. This is beneficial to his argument because it makes it easier for the reader to trust that he knows what he is talking about since sociologists study these types of situations and their effects on society. Since Farley participates actively in protests against the war, he is part of the movement and knows about the situation.
Furthermore, the organization of Farley's article helps his argument. He separates the article into different sections with subtitles for all the different claims he is making to support his thesis. He states the claim and then gives his evidence and reasoning in an organized paragraph or two. This assists him in his argument because his writing is well structured, helping the reader clearly understand each claim he is making. Also, if an author can't organize his ideas in writing, he is showing his weakness and the audience will not take him seriously as an int...
... middle of paper ...
...othing false about them.
Overall, I believe Farley would do an excellent job persuading any audience that "An American Attack on Iraq is Not Justified." Through his language he proved to the audience that he was serious about the subject. Through his clear thesis, concise organization, and even his educational background, he showed the audience that he is intelligent and knows what he is writing about. Through his explanation of the pro-war side he proved that he cares about his audience and he is not scared of proving anyone wrong. His use of logic, rhetoric, and language proved to be persuasive in his argument. He succeeds masterfully in persuading his audience that going to war in Iraq is not justified.
Works Cited
Farley, John E. "An American Attack on Iraq is Not Justified." Iraq Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. William Dudley. Greenhaven Press, 2004. 27-31.
Dodds, Joana and Ben Wilson. "THE IRAN-IRAQ WAR: UNATTAINABLE OBJECTIVES1." Middle East Review of International Affairs (Online) 13, no. 2 (06, 2009): 72-94. http://search.proquest.com/docview/220899524?accountid=8289.
In June of 2003, Howard Zinn’s “Dying for the Government” was published in “The Progressive” newspaper. He discusses the government’s claim to military victory in Iraq, and he believes that many innocent people have died for an unjust cause in that war. His claim is that soldiers died for their government, not their country. An important part of his argument is his discussion of democracy, which he says is what our country is supposed to be based on. He also brings up some history of U.S. wars and quotes Mark Twain’s statement about the invasion of the Phillipines by the United States. Even though some of his assertions lack evidence, Zinn uses authority and structure very well to make his argument effective.
Popular Mechanics.eds. “Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report.” Popular Mechanics Online. March 2005. 26 August 2008. http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html.
Since the 9/11 attacks, the Bush administration has been calling every citizens and every nations to support his Middle East policy. Nonetheless, the U.S. has been involved in the middle-east struggle for more than half of the century, wars were waged and citizens were killed. Yet, political struggles and ideological conflicts are now worse than they were under Clinton’s presidency. As “President’s Address to the Nation” is a speech asking everybody to support the troops to keep fighting in Iraq, I, as an audience, am not persuaded at all because of his illogical fallacy in the arguments. In this essay, I will analyze how and what are the illogical fallacies he uses in the speech.
On March 18, 2003 the United States invaded Iraq. (The Washington Post) The War with Iraq is a very divisive issue around the world. Turn on any news show and you will see a daily debate on the pros and cons of going to war. Because of the situations that have occurred between the United States and Iraq, very different views and perceptions have developed. Much debate on the justification of the United States for being in Iraq, let alone overthrowing its “government”, has been presented from both sides – the Hawks and the Doves.
James Bamford, A Pretext for War: 9/11, Iraq, and The Abuse of America’s Intelligence Agencies (United States of America: Doubleday, 2004), passim.
Schmidt, Michael. “Fatal Bombs in Iraq Seemed Aimed at Militia.” The New York Times. 09 Feb. 2011. Web. 26 Feb. 2011.
Lovinger, Paul W., and Harry Scott. "Why Bush's War Is Illegal." Why Bush's War Is Illegal. N.p., n.d. Web. 28 Mar. 2014. < http://warandlaw.homestead.com/files/bushwar.htm>
All the channels had reported the celebration in the Iraqi streets and happy faces of the citizens as they were free of a dictator. By now he was no longer surprised that the protests against the allied forces were not yet reported in any American news, as it was not yet time for people to know about it. He recalled hearing the words from the British Prime Minister back during the world war, “If people really knew the truth the war would be stopped tomorrow, but of course they don’t know and can’t know” (Television). He couldn’t wonder but think if the American public knew all the truths would the war still be supported? probably yes. When the weapons of mass destruction, the main reason for the Iraq war were not found even months after the war, Bob could not wonder but question himself how much was his contribution to all the death and destruction in Iraq.
Chomsky and the Heritage Society take opposing views on the issue of the war on terror. Noam Chomsky argues in the article ““Looking Back on 9/11: Was there an Alternative” that by rushing into this war, the U.S just fell into bin-Laden’s trap of forcing them to engage in many expensive wars that would drive them to bankruptcy (Chomsky). Whereas as the in the article titled ““A Counterterrorism Strategy for the "Next Wave"”, the Heritage Society disputes that the war and the negative effects of it are justifiable because it is for the greater good, it is to prevent terrorism. They insist on spe...
“Why We Fight” is a 2005 documentary, directed by Eugene Jarecki, inquiring the dumbfounded intent of the United States’ recent intrusion and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. It compiles archival footage and incorporates it with recent interviews, many conducted for the film, but, the film has not revealed anything that hasn’t been exposed to the mass consumption. There is also sufficient contemporary footage as well within this documentary: (1) congressmen making the case for military allocation; (2) the principal actors in the Bush administration quarreling for the obligation of intervening in Iraq; and (3) the 2003 incursion and subsequent occupation. This movie also portrays four Americans whose lives have been directly altered due to the Iraq War. None of
Farley, John E. "An American Attack on Iraq is Not Justified." Iraq Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. William Dudley. Greenhaven Press, 2004. 27-31.
Pillar, P 2006, ‘Intelligence, Policy, and the War in Iraq’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 15-27.
I had heard from many of my friends about Noam Chomsky and how he may just be the most important intellectual alive today. So while I was helping my friend with an assignment of hers I came across this book at her house. I flipped through a couple of pages and decided to use this book for this project. I thought it would provide a new insight into the role of our government in the media.
8) ?After the Attack?The War on Terrorism? (2001). Online at: <http://www.monthlyreview.org/1101edit.htm>, consulted on March 29th, 2004.