Justice in A View from the Bridge
Arthur Miller is now regarded as one of the world’s greatest
dramatists. In his plays he explores the struggles of the ordinary man
against authority and insurmountable odds.
Miller's own struggle therefore with this issue is present in ‘A View
from the Bridge’ as he, like the characters in his plays (such as
Eddie Carbone), was faced with the problem of choosing to be American
or not, specifically by naming names of people who were doing (what
were considered then) unlawful acts. Miller chose to write about a
community that accepted and protected unlawful people.
Miller spent two years in the shipyards of Brooklyn and was thus able
to study the social background of the lives of the dockworkers in that
area. Many of the immigrants were of illegal legacy and were being
exploited by the people who helped bring them to America and so
consequently he further advanced his knowledge of the community spirit
in the slum areas of New York and the beliefs and values of the
Sicilian community as a whole.
The law however, is everywhere, and this is the role played by
Alfieri in ‘A view from the Bridge’ and much of his speaking takes the
form of soliloquies. His description of the people within the play and
narration at the beginning of each scene helps to distinguish the
different sections of the play. Alfieri is fairly unimportant in the
action of the play in general, but he more importantly frames the play
as a form of a modern story.
The words justice and law are frequently heard in the play. Alfieri,
the lawyer for all intents and purposes is the view from the bridge.
He is the all-seeing, all-knowing, objective outsider looking in,
correctly predicting the forthcoming...
... middle of paper ...
...iations with names. They believe in trust and want revenge when a
member has been wronged. Some of these values, however, come in
conflict with those of the American system of justice. Eddie Carbone
chooses to turn against his community and abide by the state laws. He
looses the respect of his community and friends—the name and personal
identity he treasures. Eddie Carbone, with a stronger allegiance to
the community, reverts back to another custom of Sicilian-Americans:
revenge. Not only is Eddie pulled back to the values of his community,
but the final victor of the play is symbolic of community values—the
Italian, Marco. Thus, the small community is stronger than American
law. However as aforementioned, the age-old battle between law and
justice will never have a winner, and sometimes as Alfieri wisely
states, it is better to settle for half measures.
In light of the most recent election results I find myself worrying about the countless social and economic injustices that will perpetuate to occur in our country. I dwell on our history, of how our social welfare system created and continues to reinforce discrimination, privilege and oppression. How did we end up like this and where is that “American dream” promised to those within our boarders? Literary works $2.00 a Day: Living on Almost Nothing in America by Kathryn Edin and Luke Shaefer, Nobody: Casualties of America’s War on the Vulnerable, from Ferguson to Flint and Beyond by Marc Lamont Hill, and Bryan Stevenson’s book, Just Mercy: A story of justice and redemption, seek to describe how social injustices and economic issues manifest
The cover of Kevin Boyle’s, Arc of Justice: A Saga of Race, Civil Rights, and Murder in the Jazz Age, features a worn black-and-white photograph of what looks like a packed courtroom, with four men in the foreground looking off to the right, as if awaiting a verdict. All of them, three white and one black, wearing suits, have their faces scrubbed out, as if someone had taken an eraser to them while the photograph was still wet. Similar to its cover, the 80-year-old Ossian Sweet case has nearly been wiped out of American history. The author, Kevin Boyle, is an associate professor of history and best known for his books on the labor movement. Boyle finishes reconstructing the Ossian Sweet case so we have a clear, precise snapshot of an incident
In our democratic societies, rife with vice and disputes over justice, there might have already been similar cases as those of our plays. Perhaps, one had already committed matricide under external pressure(a gun to his/her head, or a beloved one), perhaps one breached the fence of law, in order to achieve goodness(ran a red light to get to his/her dying mother) or even perhaps, someone had unknowingly committed incest with his mother who had been separated at birth. With all these morally perplexing question, how then, can we reason our way through the contested terrain of justice and injustice, equity and inequity? As the Greek plays have provided us, is to encounter with a hard moral dilemma. To start with an opinion, or a conviction about justice just like the Greek playwrights did.
“We live in a world where justice is skewed.” This statement can be interpreted in many different ways. I personally think that this statement means that the way our justice system can be altered in good ways and bad ways. In the many stories we have read there were different situations that altered the justice system. Many people view justice in different ways. Throughout the stories we have read, there were many different ways that justice was skewed, both positively and negatively. No way is particularly better than the other, however most people favor one way or another. Thsi statement is true in many situations and can be applied to our lives.
These are never-before-told history of how the civil rights movement began; how it was in part started in protest against the ritualistic rape of black women by white men who used economic intimidation, sexual violence, and terror to derail the freedom movement; and how those forces persisted unpunished throughout the Jim Crow era when white men assaulted black women to enforce rules of racial and economic hierarchy. At the Dark Side of the Street investigates the events that led up to the civil rights movement in Alabama 1944. Such a pattern of crimes, not only against black women but against black men also, helped to stir the Civil Rights Movement. Even though the main crime toward black women was rape, the whole African-American race was raped in a sense that none were allowed certain privileges, opportunities, or justices. At the Dark Side of the Street takes us back into those dark days into a world of cover-ups, the “justice” from law enforcement, and the aftermath of such incidents.
Revenge is medicine to most people or it is an ongoing circle. When a person is betrayed or inflicted pain it is a natural reaction to think of a way to cause the same pain back. Revenge is part of everyday life and many find pleasure through it. Although it may be the natural reaction and could be someone’s gut feeling that is telling him or her to do it is almost never right and does not pay off in the end. Revenge is a ongoing circle due to the fact that when someone does something wrong to a person that person will want to do it right back and keep going back and forth until justice intervenes or someone realizes it is morally wrong. Just like the saying “an eye for an eye will make the whole world blind” is the
Authors have the choice of expository, descriptive, narrative, or persuasive when writing. Even though, they are different, they all have one thing in common, the author writes about it for a reason. Whether it’s for themselves or someone else the author has a strong feeling behind what they write and they want to share it. When an author chooses to write in persuasive writing the goal is to make the reader see what they see or to at least make them look at the point in a different way. When writing about broader subjects there are more possibilities people are going to have different ideas, so in The Myth of Justice there are multiple ways someone could look upon it. Personally I found the piece quite ineffective in style and content.
...ivisive agent, actually been voided, or only cast aside? Is Shylock and Antonio’s code of honor truly obsolete? A sense of false sincerity permeates the final scene. The temporal ambiguity between night and day with which the play ends suggests that a complete resolution has not been achieved. In being neither night nor day, it ends in a kind of dramatic unreality. Metatheatrical in its elevation of words and language, The Merchant of Venice is consciously distinct from the realism of the off-stage world. And yet in the course of its five acts, the play fails to define a solid dramatic “otherworld,” in which new values and authorities are introduced and made permanent. Rather, it seems to end ambiguously, and fragmented. It falls short of true resolution, and concludes with a statement of shortcoming, informing us that there are still “two hours to day” (V.i.325).
The ideal society we would all be considered equal, but reality often defies this idealism. When we think of police officers, we think of people working hard to keep us all safe, but this may not always be the case in today 's society. This is demonstrated in an opinion piece published in the Miami Herald, entitled “Need a ‘big, bad dude’? White criminals need not apply” by Leonard Pitts Jr. The article opens by discussing the shooting of African-American man Terence Crutcher, where the police officer who shot him stated it was due to him not obeying her orders and reaching inside his SUV for a weapon. However, the video of the shooting shows that this did not happen. The article also goes on to discuss other African-Americans shot in recent
In "a view from the Bridge", justice and law are not presented as being synonymous.
...e protested against justice being totally pushed into background with mercy holding the field. The Duke compels Angelo to get married to Mariana, the girl whom he had once betrayed and forsaken, and the girl whom he has now seduced. But that is the only punishment which is imposed upon a character who proves to be the worst sinner among all the characters of the play.
Can there be justice for all? To answer this question I must first define what justice is. Justice is ?the quality of being just, impartial or fair? in your dealings with others according to Merriam Webster?s Collegiate Dictionary. Keeping that definition in mind, I now must turn to the Voices of Wisdom in order to find an example of a situation in which all parties feel that they are being treated justly. After examining examples such as: Euthanasia, discrimination based on sexual orientation, and equal opportunity offered within the book, it becomes clear to me that there is in fact no possible way for there to be justice for all because everyone?s judgement is in some way or another clouded by their own self interests.
Today’s justice system is broken and flawed, with a history of falsely convicting innocent people due to a variety of things, including eyewitness misidentification, invalid or improper forensic testing, and even racial bias on the jury. Many wrongful convictions happen as a result of a combination of these things, and other causes can contribute in each individual case (“causes”). Countless people throughout history have been punished for crimes they did not commit, and with recent advancements in DNA testing bringing about hundreds of exonerations of the wrongfully convicted, one has to wonder how many innocents have languished in prisons throughout history. With all the flaws and potential for error in our courtrooms today, justice can not be brought about by our current system; in order to repair it, we need governmental reform to promote true equity and prevent future miscarriages of justice.
The Effects of the Sicilian Code of Honour in A View from the Bridge by Arthur Miller
The Importance of Justice in Society One component of the definition of justice is the final outcome of the process of the law, whereby justice is distributed by the State. According to this definition, justice is the mechanical process of the structure of law – set in place and agreed to by the people of the State. Another definition is concerned with the value inherent in ‘just’ behavior. One distinction between these two definitions is the difference between an individual viewpoint and the larger view of the society. Either view incorporates the concept of moral judgment; ‘good’ as opposed to ‘bad’.