Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
how to reduce terrorism
essay on the prevention of terrorism
essay on the prevention of terrorism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: how to reduce terrorism
Winston Churchill once said, “Let our advance worrying become advance thinking and planning.” So as a nation, the conflicts we now find ourselves engaged in requires the innovative development of strategies, which go beyond our past conventional thought. We must force ourselves to think of new ways to defeat or prevent a new kind of enemy from accomplishing his mission, one that is generally unseen, is driven ideologically, does not seek a set battle, and is like no other faced before. The theme of this monograph is to suggest measures that could be implemented to prevent terrorism, from an emergency management perspective. It will also seek to provide an explanation of the intelligence cycle and structure of the United States intelligence community, with an examination of some of the existing problems in counterterrorism intelligence in the United States.
Everything we do for prevention of a terrorist act will have a trade-off. The more precise the information we receive about a specific threat, the more narrow we can make our focus in order to intervene to prevent the threat. This will be very beneficial in maintaining the community support networks, because of a possible reduced disruption and inconvenience to a large majority of people, along with a more efficient use of resources (Chertoff, 2007). Emergency managers should use the all-hazards approach for planning; in concert with preparedness and response exercises to help build the community support networks, and familiarize everyone with plans, policies, agreements, and procedures. Then conduct drills, functional exercises, and full-scale exercises: validate plans, policies, agreements, and procedures; clarify roles and responsibilities; and ide...
... middle of paper ...
...pping the actions of this growing and determined nemesis.
Works Cited
Amies, N. (2010). Failures at all levels undermining U.S. spy agencies’ crackdown on terror. Retrieved November 29, 2010, from http://www.dw-world.de/failures-at-all-levels-undermining-US-spy-agencies’-crackdown-on-terror.htm
Central Intelligence Agency (2009). Work of the CIA: The Intelligence Cycle. Retrieved November 29, 2010, from http://www.cia.gov/library/publications/additional-publications/the-work-of-a-nation/work-of-the-cia.html
Chertoff, M. (2007). Remarks by homeland security secretary at a symposium on improvised explosive devices in the United States. Domestic Preparedness Journal,
Director of National Intelligence (2009). An overview of the United States intelligence community for the 111th Congress. Retrieved November 29, 2010, from http://www.dni.gov/overview.pdf
Prados, John. Safe for Democracy The Secret Wars of the CIA. Chicago, IL: Ivan R Dee, Publisher, 2006.
The Executive Order Establishing Office of Homeland Security Council puts forth an agenda on countering terrorist acts; it is done to prevent untold a...
Burke, Robert. Counter-Terrorism for Emergency Responders. 2nd ed. Florida: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 2007. Print.
Weiner, Tim. Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA. New York: Doubleday, 2007. Print.
After the attacks by the predominantly Saudi extremists on 9-11, the administration of then President George ‘Dubya’ Bush went into overdrive to be seen as proactive in the effort to make sure that the attacks could not be repeated. With the passage of The USA Patriot Act, the then President Bush asserted, we would be handed our intelligence and law enforcement officers the required tools and abilities to fight this new and ‘present danger.’ The document lays out the assertions of the President as of October 26, 2001 as given during a speech at the White House. Also included are the contrasting comments and opinions of Suzanne Spaulding, who has served in the intelligence community for 25 years under both Republican and Democratic presidents and is currently Under Secretary for the National Protection and Programs Directorate at the Department of Homeland Security.
"POSITIONING AMERICA’S EMERGENCY HEALTH CARE SYSTEM TO RESPOND TO ACTS OF TERRORISM." A Report of the Terrorism Response Task Force American College of Emergency Physicians 1 Oct. 2002: 1-26. Web. .
The NSA or the National Security Agency, is “the largest intelligence agency in the US, which is responsible for collecting and analyzing communications and signals intelligence, plus cybersecurity” ( MacAskill, Borger, and Greenwald par. 1-2). Since its inception, “the very existence of the National Security Agency was not revealed more than two decades after its establishment in 1952” ( MacAskill, Borger, and Greenwald par. 1). and since “its structure and activities remain largely unknown. Hence its wry nickname: No Such Agency” ( MacAskill, Borger, and Greenwald par.1). “Once President Harry Truman established the NSA, its purpose was to collect data and information across the country and internationally. The task originally gi...
After the terrorist attacks on 9/11, the United States Intelligence community was forced to conduct major reforms. Issues in interdepartmental communication, intelligence gathering, and chain of command were addressed by reforms. According to some, these major changes have been ineffective in protecting the United States from terrorist attacks. To others; however, these reforms have been extremely helpful in the defense of the US. While many see civilians as having no direct contact with the intelligence portion of the federal government, the work that they do protects all citizens. Without the intervention of these federal departments, citizens would be defenseless on local, state, and federal levels from terrorist threats. Although no federal agency can completely protect its citizens, the reforms made by the US intelligence community have been effective, mainly in the areas of Homeland
Terrrorism has been an issue for the United States long before 9/11, but the savage attack on that day brought terrorism front and center and therefore made the issue top priority for the leadership. To date, the crime of terrorism causes many debates, such as, how to deter events from occurring again, but one section of terrorism that is somewhat neglected is the risks for first responders in preparing and responding to attacks. The crime of terrorism has many layers and first responders are the first to hit the ground when an attack strikes and the risk of them being harmed, maimed or even killed are extremely
The United States has endured numerous security breaches and high security threats over the past two decades. After the attacks on 9/11, the office of Intelligence became a vital source in retrieving sensitive data and tracking down potential terrorists and their networks which could pose a threat to the American people and then forwarding that vital information to the Department of Homeland Security and other government agencies. Intelligence became a key role in “assessing threats to critical American infrastructures, bio-and nuclear terrorism, pandemic diseases, threats to the borders to the nation, and radicalization within American society” (Randol, 2009, p. 7). The sharing of homeland security intelligence has become a precedence for Congress and the government. Our nation must be one step ahead of any potential terrorists that want to harm our turf. Within this text the capabilities and limitations of both domestic and foreign intelligence in supporting homeland security efforts will be explained;
Homeland security was developed by the United States government to protect the country from external aggression, reduce the likelihood of terrorist attacks and manage the damage that occurs in case of attacks. To this end, the government set up and reconstituted numerous agencies to aid in the fight against terrorism in the United States. The United States Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security constitute the most prominent departments under the United States law to champion the fight against any attacks by extremist groups. Federal, State and local law enforcement agencies, as well as the United States’ military also have a role to play in homeland security. With the increasing cases of attacks and acts of aggression towards the United States, the government sought to strengthen the resolve to curb any attacks aimed at killing or maiming the citizens or destruction of government institutions and installations. In the wake of the September 11 attacks, it was apparent that stringent measures were needed to prevent attacks on American soil and protect the citizens of the country. This paper examines the duties; responsibility and intelligence methods used by the military, federal, State and local law enforcement agencies, as well as homeland security agencies in the fight against terrorism, with the aim of drawing similarities and differences.
United Sttes. Central Intelligence. Operations. By Richard Helms. United States Government. 14 Apr. 2013 .
The DIA started in 1958. The organizational structure of the DoD and U.S. foreign intelligence came to a new shape with the establishment of DIA. It was Robert McNamara, then Secretary of Defense, who came up with the concept of DIA in 1961. DIA gathers human source intelligence, analyzes technical intelligence, distributes intelligence/reports to the intelligence agencies, provides advice and support to the Joint Chiefs of Staff with foreign military intelligence, and provides military intelligence to combatant commands as its operational functions. A DIA director is supposed to be a three-star military general and DIA is believed to have employed at least 7,500 staff worldwide today. The DIA is a defense intelligence agency that prevents strategic surprises and delivers a decision advantage to warfighters, defense planners, and to policymakers. This paper will try to evaluate DIA’s role in US national security in present condition of massive budget deficits and increased congressional oversight, plus the intelligence capabilities of the Regional Combatant Commanders and the individual services like CIA and NSA.
Tidd, J. M. (2008). From revolution to reform: A brief history of U.S. intelligence. The SAIS