Predation cost of conspicuous male coloration in collard lizards (Crotaphytus collaris): an experimental test using clay- covered model lizards.

772 Words2 Pages

The results propose that the balance between natural selection for inconspicuousness and sexual selection for conspicuousness may vary among the lizard populations. At SL, the habitat consists primarily of gray rocks, so the SL collared lizard population has a small chance to hide. Because of this, the male SL lizards are a dull greenish-brown color that is similar to the females and rocks. At GM, the background is more complicated, so the male lizards are more conspicuous compared to the rocks and females (Macedonia et al. 2004). More than double the number of models was preyed upon at SL than at GM, which shows that natural selection restricts sexual selection for colorful males more efficiently at SL than GM. This reveals why the males at SL are duller than those collared lizards at GM. This seems to be different for the WM population.
These male WM populations are more conspicuous than the GM and SL males; however, WM has the greatest predation pressure among the three sites. The investigators suggested that the WM males may look conspicuous outside of its environment, but may actually be cryptic in its complex environment (Baird et al. 1997; McCoy et al. 1997). When this idea was tested, mixed support for it was found. They found that some areas of the site caused the WM lizards to be conspicuous (flowers, lichens, and vegetation) and other areas caused the lizards to be more inconspicuous (rocks and other vegetation) (Macedonia et al. 2004).
Another reason why male WM lizards may be more conspicuous even though the population experiences great predation pressure is the tall grass area in WM. These tall grasses offer great concealment from visually hunting snakes, like the coachwhip. Because the WM collared lizards may se...

... middle of paper ...

...J. M., Husak, J. F., Brandt, Y. M., Lappin, A. K. & Baird, T. A. 2004: Sexual dichromatism and color conspicuousness in three populations of collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris) from Oklahoma, USA. J. Herpetol. 38, 343—357.

Marshall, N. J. 2001. Tunable colour vision in a mantis shrimp. Nature, 411, 547.

McCoy, J. K., Fox, S. F. & Baird, T. A. 1994: Geographic variation in sexual dimorphism of Crotaphytus collaris. Southwest Nat. 39, 328—335.Endler, J. A. 1990: On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 41, 315—352.

McCoy, J. K., Harmon, H. J., Baird, T. A. & Fox, S. F. 1997: Geographic variation in sexual dichromatism of Crotaphytus collaris. Copeia 1997, 565—571.

Pocklington, R. & Dill, L. M. 1995: Predation on females or males: who pays for bright male traits? Anim. Behav. 49, 1122—1124.

More about Predation cost of conspicuous male coloration in collard lizards (Crotaphytus collaris): an experimental test using clay- covered model lizards.

Open Document