Power in Andrew Niccol’s In Time

1060 Words3 Pages

It is the year 2169 and people have been genetically altered to not age after the age of twenty-five. This however comes at a cost, one year after someone’s twenty-fifth birthday the person dies unless they work to stay alive. This is managed with a bold green digital clock that is embedded in the forearm of every person. After this birthday the clock begins to countdown and if it reaches zero the person “times out” and dies immediately. Moreover, there is no physical currency but money is given out in the sense of time now. Time is transferred by both grasping one’s forearm and turning it slightly or by a machine scanning the arm. Workers’ wages, goods, and services are paid in hours and minutes. This leaves the world split into two different societies or “time zones” where the wealthy live on forever and the poor live day by day.
Will Salas, played by Justin Timberlake, is a twenty-eight year old poor factory worker that lives in the ghetto of Dayton with his mother Rachel. The wealthy live in a place called New Greenwich, which Will boasts to his mother about all the time saying they will live there one day. One night after working Will goes into a bar with his friend Borel and notices a man that seems to be getting a lot of attention. The man is well groomed and dressed wearing a nice suit. After getting a closer glance of the man and his arm Will can see the that he is wealthy in time. To Will it is obvious that the man is not from Dayton and is instead from New Greenwich.
While Will is having a conversation with the man about leaving the bar before someone steals his time, the “minute men” come through the doors. These men are criminals that steal time from other people. Will escapes the minute men with the man and both...

... middle of paper ...

...re affected as people in Dayton have no hopes or aspirations for themselves as they cannot advance in the system they are in.
As a whole the film In Time puts in perspective many ideas from Marxist criticism. The plot surrounding around the imbalance between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat is a staple in the Marxist class conflict argument. The way that capitalism is being portrayed in this movie is something that most Marxists would like. Capitalist economies are viewed to always end in failure from a Marxist standpoint and the film does show that. In Time also shows the capitalist economy as the base and how it affects its superstructure by influencing changes in beliefs and culture of its society. The general message that Andrew Niccol’s In Time tells the audience is that we live in a world where the majority of the power is in the hands of the select few.

More about Power in Andrew Niccol’s In Time

Open Document