Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stalinism transformation of the economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Stalinism transformation of the economy
Simply tinkering with the economy or even offering greater material incentives will not be adequate. It requires liberalization of the overall political and intellectual climate to restore some legitimacy to the regime in the eyes of its population, and to make people believe that they have some stake in the system, no matter how illusory this is in reality. Only then will they be prepared to make the sacrifices the regime will require. Although innovative, General Secretary Khrushchev has realized that such a policy is fraught with dangers and has definite limits. There will have to be change, but not too great as to threaten the ruling group’s hold on power. The system has to be reformed, but without weakening the rudimentary class relations from which the elite derives its privileges. Publishing “One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich” will result in the discrediting of pro-Stalinists and the pseudo-culture of socialist realism. People will be inspired to think and speak independently, and this freedom from indictment of anti-Soviet speeches will foster loyalty for the leadership. This, in turn, will lead to improvement in productivity and ultimately, economic revival: the most effective means of solidifying control. Shukhov, the protagonist of the novel, is an impoverished and uneducated man: an anomaly in Russian literature. He is not an aristocrat, an intellectual, or an ardent victim like most of the heroes of nineteenth-century Russian novels. Shukhov is a simple peasant, possibly even illiterate. When he sees the poem Kolya is copying out, for instance, he does not recognize the odd way of writing each line directly beneath the previous one. He is impressed by men such as Caesar who have lived in Moscow, which to Shukhov... ... middle of paper ... ...ot rely on the coercive power of the market, in particular unemployment. Nor can it offer workers the positive inducements to labor that genuine socialist democracy would provide. Both necessitate a total transformation of the property and power relations of the Soviet system and would, in their different ways, deprive the elite of any basis for its continued rule: the one by restoring capitalism, the other by allowing a politicized and self-conscious society collectively to determine policies, priorities, and the ways these would be achieved. The only conceivable course of action is a social and political thaw to restore the people’s faith in the government, and consequently secure their sacrifices. Publishing this novel will be strategic to Russia’s liberalization, and General Secretary Khrushchev’s ensuing glorious and indubitable conquest of power in the Party.
Tucker, Robert C. "Stalinism as Revolution from Above". Stalinism. Edited by Robert C. Tucker. New York: American Council of Learned Societies, 1999.
Shukhov is a likeable and yet somewhat naïve fellow who is just like everybody else. In fact, what really makes this book remarkable is not Shukhov himself. What makes it special is that, even though at first glance the story may seem to be about Shukhov, it is actually a tale of events and common occurrences that could happen to anyone. The book is not just a detail of one day in the life of Ivan, it is a relatable story of what could happen to anyone shoved into a Russian prison camp. Ivan’s life in the book is shown to be nothing more than a picture of the thousands of lives that were lost or destroyed in the Stalinist camps. Ivan Denisovich Shukhov is not one character, Ivan Denisovich Shukhov is the picture of “anyman.” Using the depiction of the beliefs, hopes, and need to survive that would arise in a common prisoner Solzhenitsyn creates a story of the victory of humane principles over corruption.
This novel and film commentary analysis or interpretation will be first summarised and then critiqued. The summary will be divided into twenty- four episodes. While summarising it is well to remember that the film was made out of the book.
...looked at as he is the literate outsider who knows how to write and read , yet this presupposed privilege later on makes Liutov as minor instead of being superior . During the story , Liutov gives up gradually his academic superiority and in other words gives up his ‘individual’ identity in order to be part of this solidarity and collectivism that shape the Cossacks society.
Chekhov is part of a non-typical category of artists, because he did not believe in his genius, on the contrary, there is evidence that he believed that his work will not conquer time and posterity. Spectacular, just like Russia at the border between the 19th and 20th century, Chekhov was born the son of serfs in 1860 ( Tsar Alexander will abolish serfdom in 1861) only to become a landlord 32 years later, and a neighbor of Prince Shakovskoi. He bought the Melikhovo estate (unconsciously imitating Tolstoy, the patriarch of Iasnaia Polyana), not far from Moscow, with 13 thousand rubles of which he has paid an advance of five thousand. Chekhov is the true precursor of the theater of the absurd.
Corin, Chris, Fiehn, Terry, Communist Russia under Lenin and Stalin (2002), John Murray Publishers Ltd, London
When first learning about the Russian Revolution, one of the most controversial and complex political transitionary periods in modern history, one may be completely overwhelmed with the wealth of information about the period that may be found, both in books and online. In her seminal short novel, The Russian Revolution, noted Russian historian Sheila Fitzpatrick provides the reader with a comprehensive history of the subject, ushering the reader back in time to pre-Soviet Russia, where the recently uprooting of the feudal system would eventually lead to the rise of Lenin . Fitzpatrick provides a thoughtful analysis of the pre-revolutionary conditions in Russia, which leads into her comparisons of the period against her “perfect” model of the typical
Russia, a vast country with a wealth of natural resources, a well, educated population, and diverse industrial base, continues to experience, formidable difficulties in moving from its old centrally planned economy to a modern market economy. President Yeltsin's government has made substantial strides in converting to a market economy since launching its economic reform program in January 1992 by freeing nearly all prices, slashing defense spending, eliminating the old centralized distribution system, completing an ambitious voucher privatization program, establishing private financial institutions, and decentralizing trade. Russia, however, has made little progress in a number of key areas that are needed to provide a solid foundation for the transition to a market economy.
Throughout the 20th century, many countries were ruled by totalitarian leaders who were ready to commit many horrible deeds in order to achieve their goals. Josef Stalin, the leader of Soviet Union between 1924 and 1953, is the perfect example of a despotic ruler, who was responsible for the deaths of millions of people. He believed that communism would transform the Soviet Union into a perfect nation, with an ideal society where everyone would be treated equally. However, in order to achieve this perfection, all external and, more importantly, internal enemies had to be destroyed. Instead of a perfect nation, Stalin created a system, which was based on fear and denunciation, where killing of the so-called "enemies of the nation" became a sport, where Stalin's representatives competed against each other on the basis of the number of "enemies" killed. Throughout almost three decades, millions of innocent people were either killed or put into labour camps. The author of the book himself, was sentenced to eight years in a concentration camp for his anti-Soviet views, which he expressed in writing, and through the characters of his novel, Solzhenitsyn portrays his personal beliefs. Most of the characters in "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" are innocent people, who have never done anything reprehensible. Among them is Gopchik, a sixteen-year-old boy who was sentenced to 10 years in concentration camp for giving milk to Ukrainian nationalist rebels, and Aleshka the Baptist who received twenty-five years for his religious beliefs. The protagonist of the novel, Ivan Denisovich Shukhov, is a simple man without any heroic qualities. He is a former carpenter who was sent off to the battlefield during the World War II. After being captured by the Germans, Ivan and five of his fellow soldiers were able to escape and return to the Soviet military base. However, three of them were killed instantly, mistaken for German soldiers while the fourth soldier died from wounds a couple of days later. Although Ivan Denisovich was not shot, he was arrested and accused of being a German spy. Even though he was innocent, he had to confess during the interrogation, because he understood that he would be shot immediately if he did not. As a result, he was sentenced to ten years in a Siberian concentration camp for betraying Soviet Union. The Soviet labour camps represented a small-scale totalitarian nation, where wardens were the despotic rulers who frequently abused the prisoners.
The Soviet Union was a communist state before it fell apart in the early 1990’s. Communist political economy shaped the direction of the nation’s industrial development. Industrialization contributed to increases in Soviet wealth, but only for those favored by the communist regime. Working Soviets were left poor. This form of communism came to be because of the Russian Revolution and was based on the idea that all people are equal. While being a great idea in theory, it did not work out in the real world. Soviet-style industrialization was about earning money quickly and in an efficient manner, the officials implemented the idea that “everyone should be the master in his own house”, and they achieved great power and money.
Dallin, Alexander, and Gail W. Lapidus. The Soviet System: From Crisis to Collapse. Revised Edition. Colorado: Westview Press, 1995. Suraska, Wisconsin.
The cold war was failed by the Soviet Union for many reasons, including the sudden collapse of communism (Baylis & Smith, 2001.) This sudden collapse of communism was brought on ultimately by internal factors. The soviet unions president Gorbachev’s reforms: glasnost (openness) and perestroika (political reconstructering) ultimately caused the collapse of the Soviet Empire. Gorbachev’s basics for glasnost were the promotion of principles of freedom to criticize; the loosening of controls on media and publishing; and the freedom of worship. His essentials of perestroika were, a new legislature; creation of an executive presidency; ending of the ‘leading role’ of the communist party; allowing state enterprises to sell part of their product on the open market; lastly, allowing foreign companies to own Soviet enterprises (Baylis & Smith, 2001.) Gorbachev believed his reforms would benefit his country, but the Soviet Union was ultimately held together by the soviet tradition he was trying to change. The Soviet Union was none the less held together by “…powerful central institutions, pressure for ideological conformity, and the threat of force.
Periodically, a relationship between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat can be a clouded perception, only due to the fact the proletariat will not be given the chance to speak from their point of view. This such thing is not true when it comes to the short story, “A Disgraceful Affair.” The story is based around the Russian interpretation of Marxism, shown in the forethought to the opening paragraph, in which it speaks “Our beloved motherland was experiencing a renaissance; her brave sons, fired with impulses at once touching and naïve, were seeking with an uncontrollable yearning for new destinies and hopes.” The thing that determines what they do is their social class and economic position, which in turn, affects what happens to them. The two men used to elaborate the idea are the bourgeoisie Mr. Ivan Ilyitch Pralinski, and proletariat Mr. Porfiry Petrov Pseldonymov.
Exploring the October revolution and the establishment of communism, Richard Pipes concludes that the origin of communism can be traced back to the distant past in Russia’s history. Pipes states that Russia had entered a period of crisis after the governments of the 19th century undertook a limited attempt at capitalisation, not trying to change the underlying patrimonial structures of Russian society. (Pipes, 1964)
"From Autocracy to Oligarchy." The Structure of Soviet History: Essays and Documents. Ed. Ronald Grigor. Suny. New York: Oxford UP, 2003. 340-50. Print.