Political and Economic Changes in Russia Since the Fall of the Soviet Union

1344 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: collapse of the soviet union

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia has undergone many changes. These changes were very profound and included the drastic restructuring of both the political structure and the economy. When the Russian people became dissatisfied with the communist system, they pushed for a regime change, which resulted in the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the introduction of a democratic system. Along with these political changes came the economic change from communism to a free market system. The new system and the old system, while initially seeming like they have many differences, are similar in the corruptness and oppression of the people. Because of this, the political and economic transitions from the old system of communism to the new democratic system in Russia have not been successful.
The Soviet Union had an official government structure, which included a legislative branch, and executive branch, and a judicial branch. However, the official government had no real power under Soviet rule and all of the actual power was held in the Communist Party. The Russian Federation, which emerged as a democratic nation after the collapse of Soviet Union, also includes the three branches of government. However, the power does not lie in the political party system but with the actual government. The executive branch consists of both a President and a Prime Minister. The President is directly elected every six years since 2012, and before that it was every four years. They are limited to two consecutive terms, but can run for an unlimited amount of non-consecutive terms. The Prime Minister is appointed by the President but must get approved by the lower house of the legislature, the Duma. Constitutionally the Prime Minister is the ...

... middle of paper ...

...cism of the Russian government, though a lot of the Russian political dissent is silenced. Despite this, the citizen’s dissatisfaction with the government has grown and has culminated into a series of protests in the past few years, which includes a reaction to rigged elections and to Putin’s policies in the Ukraine.
Russia has undergone many changes since the dissolution of the Soviet Union. It has gone through many key changes both politically and economically. The Russian government lies in between a democratic and a totalitarian system, with dissatisfaction from many of the citizens. Economically Russia’s transition has been more successful, but many of the citizen’s are in poverty and have low standards of living. In conclusion, the transition from the communist model a democratic, free market oriented model has not gone smoothly and has not been successful.

Show More
Related

  • The Legacy of Russia and the Soviet Union - Authoritarian and Repressive Traditions that Refuse to

    1785 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...oved to be singularly influential and daunting. This is, perhaps, the greatest obstacles to achieving true democracy in Russia—the authoritarian and repressive traditions that refuse to die out with the passage of time.

    Read More

  • The Effects of the Perestroika Reforms on the Dissolution of the Soviet Union

    1832 Words  | 4 Pages

    One of the most significant events in the twentieth century was the dissolution of the United Soviet Socialist Republic (USSR) in 1991. The reason why this event was so significant was because it ended the tension between the Soviet Union and the United States of America, the Cold War, and the reign of one of the greatest world powers at the time. There were many reasons for the collapse, and it has been postulated that the Perestroika reforms had the most significant effect. The reforms, implemented by Mikael Gorbachev, were meant to address the dire financial and economic situation the country was facing as a result of the incompetent Stalin regime. Though these reforms were created with the best intentions, unfortunately they failed, eventually leading to great dissatisfaction with Gorbachev’s leadership. The Communist Party was so displeased with the performance of their leader that they staged a coup d’état to remove him from power (History.com). Thus, by the end of 1991, the Perestroika reforms directly lead to the dissolution of the Soviet Union due to the collapse of the economy, lack of infrastructure of modernization, and failure to move the communist party towards democracy. One of the largest goals of the reforms was to address the broken economy.

    Read More

  • Mikahil Gorbachev: A Brief Biography

    1523 Words  | 4 Pages

    Once elected, Gorbachev set out to establish his power in the Soviet Union. Formerly a powerhouse during the early years of rapid economic growth, the Soviet Union was withering away due to the lack of cheap materials available, stagnant population growth, and a lack of trade and mobilization because of previous reforms ratified by Stalin. After years of inert growth during Leonid Brezhnev’s reign, the Soviet Union was in vital need of a new economy, a...

    Read More

  • Why Did The Soviet Union Collapse

    888 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev came to power with a vision of reform, perestroika and glasnost, which means to restructure the economy. Gorbachev would like to privatize farms, make industries more efficient, and trim down imports. In order to get people’s support of perestroika and glasnost, Gorbachev conceded some individual rights and freedoms. For instance, mass media like newspaper was allowed to criticize the missteps and wrongdoings of the Stalinist era. In addition, Yakovlev, Gorbachev’s confidante and Secretariat of the Soviet Communist Party, restored creative works such as such as books and movies and returned more than 400,000 religious buildings and places of worship to publics. Public affairs, press, politics, education, and free speech were glasnost. Without surprise, glasnost and perestroika gradually became people’s favor and overthrew the socialism. As a result, owing to loosening controls over the people and making reforms to the political and economic elites, liberated minority groups, under-represented and mistreated for ages, began requiring self-determination and the Soviet government emerged weak and vulnerable to the publics. Furthermore, one of the reform, the permission of private ownership, exacerbates the economy of the Soviet Union because the nation subsidized unprofitable private enterprises and the paucity of state oversight

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Soviet Union

    1352 Words  | 3 Pages

    The USSR under Gorbachov and Russia, first under Yeltsin and then under Putin provide evidence of a slow but definite move away from many of the pillars of the Soviet Union. These developments are in the broad areas of governmental ideology, economic systems and the party’s dictatorship and authoritarian control. While addressing these main ideas, it is important to acknowledge that reformation and development does not necessarily imply a shift toward Western systems, rather is a move to a system that works effectively in the nation being studied, here immediately pre dissolution USSR and Russia since that time.

    Read More

  • Russia vs. The United States

    1712 Words  | 4 Pages

    The United States and Russia have been battling off pernicious factions menacing the stability of their democracies over the years. Russia has come a long way over the past century, enduring a number of different phases that have completely desecrated any power Russia may have had paralleled to the rest of the world. The United States, however, has been evolving into a prosperous world power that has led to new respect from many other nations. Both Russia and the United States have struggled in the past at maintaining a significant amount of cultural commitment to preservation of specific aspects of their respective democracies. Having a relatively new democracy, Russian citizens have different perceptions and expectations of government from those of United States citizens. With new liberties and freedoms, Russians are struggling to grasp the concept of capitalism and participation in government. In order to preserve strong features of democracy, such as the right to vote or freedom of speech, a country's constituents must respect and positively view their government. They must have faith in that the government is working for their best interests. Physically, the United States and Russia have been impacted greatly by their geography. Historically, the backgrounds of Russia and the United States are of stark contrast. Traditionally, Russians have a difficult time believing in the stability of their government as it has changed a number of times. Geography has had a profound influence on the Russian psyche. Russia is a land that lies open to invasion and the elements, for it possesses no major natural barriers. In the southeast, there are great plains that allow easy entrance to any would-be conquero...

    Read More

  • Russia The Mock Democracy Essay

    1176 Words  | 3 Pages

    "For hundreds of years, dictators have ruled Russia. Do they still? In the late 1980s, Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev launched a series of political reforms that eventually allowed for competitive elections, the emergence of an independent press, the formation of political parties, and the sprouting of civil society. After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, these proto-democratic institutions endured in an independent Russia" (McFual). However history has shown how Russia has always been an anti-democratic country; power having shifted to authoritarian rule under both the Communists and the Russian Tsars. Under the previous authoritarian rule, Russian citizens were stripped of their rights and freedoms, but in t...

    Read More

  • Comparison of Russian and Chinese Governments

    927 Words  | 2 Pages

    The governments of Russia and China have come a long way from their previously communist ruled government and economic systems. They have been subject to globalization and democratic influences, but they have not transformed in the same way. They differ in several aspects of their institutions including the electoral systems, the legal systems, and even the basic set up of the institutions themselves. These differences are the reason that in certain political or economical situations one country may prosper over the other.

    Read More

  • Communism In The Russian Revolution

    1196 Words  | 3 Pages

    Russia is generally apportioned the benefit of having introduced a political phenomenon that basically provided an alternative for capitalism; communism. Since this concept was only set in motion at the turn of the 20th century, we can therefore deduce that, to a large extent, Russia is, to most people, synonymous with leaders such as Lenin, Stalin, Khrushchev, and Gorbachev. This supposition is entirely based on the premise that the Russian revolution of 1914 inherently altered the socio-cultural and socio-political direction of the nation, bringing into birth a never before envisioned era where Russia was not ruled by the Tsars, but by simple men; men who spoke to and articulated the needs of the masses. To this extent, communism, therefore, is largely misconceived as having been the fulcrum of Russia’s civilization. Much of this misconception , as signaled earlier, is based on the growth and progression of the Russian society in the years after the revolution until 1990, when the Berlin wall fell, essentially bringing down with it decades of Soviet Union tradition based on communism.

    Read More

  • The Russian Mob

    4518 Words  | 10 Pages

    Since the late 1980’s the Russian people have experienced one of the most drastic transitions seen in the world to date, a transition from an attempt at communism to a workable capitalist system. As one would expect, this transition has not been painless and has been the impetus of many distressing problems for the Russian people. One such problem is organized crime. This paper will explore how organized crime during Soviet rule and the Russian Federation has created obstacles in this transition to a functioning market economy. It will illustrate how organized crime has done this by analyzing its transition from the USSR to the Russian Federation, the reasons behind its existence today, and how its operation impairs Russia’s attempts at a market economy. It will also provide some possible solutions for the crises organized crime has created, which currently plague the Russian people. Organized crime has worked its way through openings provided by the transition economy to become a setback to the Russian society and economy. Its existence disables successful economic reform by influencing important issues such as competition, entrepreneurship, capital flight, the shadow economy, and violence.

    Read More

  • How Did Catherine The Great Seek To Modernize Russia

    944 Words  | 2 Pages

    Russia has always been a country of deeply ingrained tradition and orthodoxy. While many countries in Europe changed over time with the advances of science and technology, Russia has remained behind the rest of the continent for most of history. Russia was always less advanced than Western Europe because of its isolationist policies and the xenophobic attitudes of its rulers. This resistance to change caused Russia a lot of problems over time. While most Russian rulers maintained the state’s isolationist policies, Russia also saw several rulers who looked westward and attempted to modernize their country up to the standards of the rest of Europe. These leaders attempted to improve their country with a series of reforms in an effort called westernization.

    Read More

  • U.S. Russia Relations

    1383 Words  | 3 Pages

    Russia, a vast country with a wealth of natural resources, a well, educated population, and diverse industrial base, continues to experience, formidable difficulties in moving from its old centrally planned economy to a modern market economy. President Yeltsin's government has made substantial strides in converting to a market economy since launching its economic reform program in January 1992 by freeing nearly all prices, slashing defense spending, eliminating the old centralized distribution system, completing an ambitious voucher privatization program, establishing private financial institutions, and decentralizing trade. Russia, however, has made little progress in a number of key areas that are needed to provide a solid foundation for the transition to a market economy.

    Read More

  • The Collapse of the Soviet Union

    1019 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Soviet Union, which was once a world superpower in the 19th century saw itself in chaos going into the 20th century. These chaoses were marked by the new ideas brought in by the new leaders who had emerged eventually into power. Almost every aspect of the Soviet Union was crumbling at this period both politically and socially, as well as the economy. There were underlying reasons for the collapse of communism in the Soviet Union and eventually Eastern Europe. The economy is the most significant aspect of every government. The soviet economy was highly centralized with a “command economy” (p.1. fsmitha.com), which had been broken down due to its complexity and centrally controlled with corruption involved in it. A strong government needs a strong economy to maintain its power and influence, but in this case the economic planning of the Soviet Union was just not working, which had an influence in other communist nations in Eastern Europe as they declined to collapse.

    Read More

  • Military Expansion

    599 Words  | 2 Pages

    The universal uniform laws of development ensured Russia would eventually share Western Europe’s socio-economic and political structure, and as proof he noted that contemporary Russia’s economy was forcing the state to play less of a role and that social groups were becoming independent.”

    Read More

  • Mistreatment Of Women In Mikhail Sholokhov's And Quiet Flows The Don

    1112 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the reign of Lenin and then Stalin the change from a patriarchal society to a more equal society has certainly been a positive outcome. The seemingly dictatorial and coercive government, however, was not a favorable outcome. It is clear that there is much room for improvement in Russian society at the end of Stalin’s reign.

    Read More

More about Political and Economic Changes in Russia Since the Fall of the Soviet Union

Open Document