Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
impact of software piracy
internet piracy causes and effects
positives and negatives of internet piracy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: impact of software piracy
The internet is one of the few things in the world that is truly all over the world. Millions use the internet every day for more reasons than one person can think of; to connect with family and friends, find information for a research paper, or to achieve the perfect chicken marsala recipe. The internet is made up of a mass expanse of web content and copyright, which is where online piracy comes in. Online piracy is the illegal use or distribution of copyrighted content, such as music, films, and can even include pharmaceuticals. Millions of dollars are ripped off every year from the illegal downloading of just music. Millions of dollars that are stolen from the industries that make most of their money from copyright. There are already laws in place to fight piracy, including the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) that was enacted in 1998. Though it has made an impression on stopping online piracy there are a couple things that restrict the act; it only has jurisdiction on American websites and is outdated compared to our fast paced society.That is why in late 2011 the House of Representatives introduced the bill H.R.3261: Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA).
The goal of this bill is innocent: to stop online piracy and protect property on the internet. SOPA was designed to give the Department of Justice “the ability to require US-based internet service providers (ISPs) to prevent users from accessing foreign piracy websites and force payment companies or advertising companies to stop providing their services to piracy websites” (“Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA)” 2). Those websites that do infringe copyright illegally would find themselves in court with fines from $200 to $150,000 per infringement. What makes the bill controversial is...
... middle of paper ...
...rity risks or disrupting the underlying architecture of the internet” (Phillips). If SOPA is ratified the Domain Name System (DNS) would have to be reprogrammed to filter through websites for infringement. Reprogrammed could be understood as writing some more code for the program, but on a major scale. It could leave the DNS vulnerable for cyber attack, at the same time also putting security policies outdated. It would also make users utilize DNS servers that are not guaranteed safe and reliable. SOPA is not guaranteed to work in the first place anyways according to Elmira Bayrasil, who wrote in a Forbes article that “Entrepreneurs in the developing world are faced with insurmountable obstacles that get in the way of operating their enterprises...Entrepreneurs in the developing world find ways around the roadblocks, which is the only things SOPA will be” (Bayrasil).
SOPA aroused public attention from a wide range of protests though it originally aimed to help online business damaged by piracy. On January 18, 2012, websites like Google, Reddit, Wikipedia were all blackout and drew great public attention. According to the announcement left on Wikipedia’s website, they were in protest against Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) which “has the potential to significantly change the way that information can be shared through the Internet.”(Wikipedia, 1) SOPA is designed to tackle the problem of websites that provide illegal download of pirated movies, music and other products. For websites consist of user upload materials like Youtube and Facebook, they are responsible for all the materials on their web...
There is a growing problem on the Internet with people infringing on the intellectual property rights of their rightful owners. The copying of such property goes back some time, starting in the 1500’s, and has continued until today. Lots of people do not care about rules on the Internet, doing whatever they wish to do, or they just do not care. There are numerous solutions to this problem; some of them involving increased monitoring of the Internet. The illegal downloading and distribution of copyrighted materials on the Internet should be more closely monitored and punished by the government, ensuring that the intellectual property rights of their owners are not violated.
However, despite the strong copyright policy and punishment of the United States Federal Copyright Act, as enforced by police as well as the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), piracy still rages on, especially...
An option that copyright owners have considered toward protecting their works from circulating in P2P networks is to use a variety of technological tools to prevent piracy. Such tools would be capable of blocking, decoying and redirecting the connections of unauthorized copyrighted file transfers. However, federal and state laws such as the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act of ...
Shawn Fanning brought the first example of illegal downloading to us in the summer of 1999 (Abbott 2003). Fanning provided the public with downloadable tracks of music using a program known as Napster. At its prime, there were over 80 million registered users downloading from Napster (Lam 2001). Only 6 months after operation, the RIAA (the Recording Industry Association of America) filed a lawsuit against Shawn Fanning and Napster for $100,000 per each downloaded song. The legal problem with Napster was that downloaders were not paying the due royalties to the artist and producers. Napster and its contemporary, Audiogalaxy, were not exact forms of shareware, so the RIAA was able to sue them as companies. The people who were actually doing the downloading got off scotch-free with thousands of free downloaded music tracks. As a result of the case Napster was shut down. Today we are introduced to subsequent forms of downloading, like KaZaA,Bearshare, and limewire would create a whole new kind of trouble f...
...among other things, an experiment in anarchism: a group of independent, free individuals acting without coercion and defining their own rules. The internet is exciting because there is no central authority to decide what is and is not allowed, who can talk and who cannot. This freedom is one of the intangible features that makes the internet a wonder of the modern world. Senate bill 314 seeks to destroy that freedom with artificially imposed guidelines; it seeks to impose an authority where there has been none and where the citizens do not want or need one. This is perhaps the most destructive feature of Senator Exon's proposal: it would corrupt the atmosphere of freedom that many net users find so enticing. If Senator Exon spent some time on-line, perhaps he could understand how precious this experiment really this, and perhaps he would not be so quick to end it.
...out their own business might be affected.According to Stiennon, the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 will force “utility operators, banks, and earth resources companies to comply with frameworks based on outmoded asset and vulnerability methodologies will distract them from implementing threat based defenses” (Stiennon) which means this act might affect on the computer companies’ business, their own business privacy and the relationship with the users. The business people might pay more attention on the relationship with the users and the companies’ profit. If the users stop using anything relate to the internet filed, the computer companies’ business will have a hard time. People who have this view think this act is only taking both sides benefits away.It is wasting money and hurting both sides.
Online piracy is being a threat to the business of the music, movie, and software industries. From Dictionary.com (n.d.), the definition of piracy is the unauthorized reproduction or use of a copyrighted book, recording, television program, patented invention, trademarked product. The focus of this paper is in the music, software, and e-book industries.
One of the biggest controversies which has spawned from the popularity of the net is the piracy of music, software, and movies. In the past, piracy of music and movies was fairly small scale. The only way to make illegal copies of tapes was to dub them in a double tape deck. This process was slow enough that music companies and movie studios didn't really worry about it. With the advancement of technology, however, piracy has become as easy as burning a CD or downloading music from the internet. The ease with which people can get free copies of songs or movies, production companies have tried to crack down on piracy.
The DEA and global attitude toward piracy is wrong. The law which is supposed to protect us against piracy doesn’t do what it is supposed to do. It exploits the fact that the consumers are vulnerable and it trades your privacy at the expense of supposed “protection”. The global attitude towards piracy is wrong, treating harmless people like serial killers, torturing them, soaking them in silence waiting for them to crack up. The fight for online piracy and freedom of the internet continues. The laws right now are unfit for purpose and need to change, as the real crime is by governments and local authorities, the crimes against humanitarianism, against the poor pirates who mean no harm.
Due to the fact that people pirate, artist can no longer pursue to continue making intellectual properties because people are directly stealing from them (Online Music). One day artist will have to make music on their own time because of piracy; it is very nauseating that some artist can only produce one album or even one song and then they are finished. Artist put lots and lots of effort into their works such as man hours, intense concentration, their heart, soul, and imagination. (Online Music). Artist should get something in return as payment for their commitment; they are blatantly being ripped off as an effect of piracy and all their hard work eventually runs out for nothing! According to the Online Music, “It’s about putting food on the table and covering the rent. It’s about making money… for all that equipment and rehearsal time” (1). Artist are greatly affected by the people who pirate intellectual
Physical piracy-the copying and illegal sale of hard-copy CDs, videotapes, and DVDs-costs the music industry over $4 billion a year worldwide and the movie industry more than $3.5 billion. These numbers do not factor in the growing (and difficult to measure) problem of Internet piracy, in which music and movies are transferred to digital format and copies are made of the resulting computer file. Journalist Charles C. Mann explains why Internet piracy has the potential to be vastly more damaging to copyright industr...
These reasons above are why my personal opinion is that SOPA should not be passed due to the fact that it would go against many of our rights including the first amendment. Whether it is the fact that online piracy can’t be stopped, the first amendment is being violated, or the government is becoming an overly powerful system, SOPA should not be passed to allow these things. So my personal question to you is, do you truly want to live in a world where all the information being shared is constantly monitored and edited by the government, or do you want to live in a world where you know that what your viewing is the way it is happening in the real world and you know it is one hundred percent true? Think about it and choose wisely.
Online piracy is a huge problem, one which costs the U.S. economy between $200 and $250 billion per year, and is responsible for the loss of 750,000 American jobs. These numbers seem huge: $250 billion per year loss would be almost $800 for every man, woman, and child in America. And 750,000 jobs – that’s twice the number of those employed in the entire motion picture industry in 2010 (Freakonomics). In 2010, the Government Accountability Office released a report noting that these figures “can be substantiated or traced back to an underlying data source or methodology,” which in English means these figures are legitimate and that piracy really does hurt our economy.
At the dawn of the internet, many things such as books and text became obsolete, due to insufficient monitoring of internet activity and sites. Individuals were able to gain free access to books and publications that normally needed to be bought, or required a fee. This is something that has caused problems for booksellers and publishers. Now, as technology advances, it also begins the decline of music, software, and television industries—but something can be done before it’s too late. Illegal downloading is a problem that affects us all, either directly or indirectly. Many people do not take it too seriously. They have not realized that it is an epidemic; like a disease that keeps growing as people become more knowledgeable about computers and learn more about how software runs. People openly burn music CDs and download music and movies for friends who in turn give it to their friends; it’s a never-ending cycle on illegal practices. The problem started when Napster came out and should have ended when it was shutdown. Unfortunately, not enough has been done to stop the illegal transfer of files. It’s time someone takes full action and ends this detrimental offense.