Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Traditional performance measurement system
the features of a performance measurement system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Traditional performance measurement system
Performance measurement systems (PMS) have been around for some time and even though it is typically used by businesses, measuring performance is something people do on a regular basis. Measuring performance involves setting goals and developing a plan to achieve the desired results. Part of the planning processes involves determining how to measure performance as you work towards a goal. Measuring progress provides information that can be used to make decisions to continue, improve, or eliminate activities in your plan. Just as a report card assesses how well a student has performed and identifies areas where further growth can be achieved, PMS serve the same purpose in the business world. PMS give organizations feedback on the elements they measure, which helps management determine areas where they have performed well and identify those that need improvement. “As financial and accounting people, we have the opportunity to support our organizations’ efforts towards continuous improvement by creating performance measurement systems that provide relevant, factual information on core business processes and key activities” (Miller, 1992). The key objective of a PMS is to help guide management in understanding, managing and improving their business processes while reducing costs.
Managing costs involves continuously improving processes used throughout the organization in an effort to make them as efficient as possible, whereby reducing costs. As the business world has evolved due to changes in the economy, global competition, technology, and environmental factors, so has the need to develop a new approach to measuring performance. According to Baldwin and Clark, “a good portion of America’s competitive decline is due directly to man...
... middle of paper ...
..., J A (April 1992). The new activity performance measures. CMA - the Management Accounting Magazine, 66, n3. p.34(1). Retrieved January 16, 2011, from Academic OneFile via Gale:
http://find.galegroup.com.proxy.davenport.edu/gtx/start.do?prodId=AONE&userGroupName=lom_davenportc
Rucci, A J, Kirn, S P, & Quinn, R T (Jan-Feb 1998). The employee-customer profit chain at Sears. Harvard Business Review, 76, n1. p.82(16). Retrieved February 05, 2011, from Academic OneFile via Gale:
http://find.galegroup.com.proxy.davenport.edu/gtx/start.do?prodId=AONE&userGroupName=lom_davenportc
Vitale, M R, & Mavrinac, S C (August 1995). How effective is your performance measurement system?. Management Accounting (USA), 77, n2. p.43(5). Retrieved January 16, 2011, from Expanded Academic ASAP via Gale:
http://find.galegroup.com/gtx/start.do?prodId=EAIM&userGroupName=lom_davenportc
Activity-based costing (ABC) is a costing method that is usually used as a supplement to a company’s usual costing system, and is therefore used for internal decision-making. It is designed to inform managers of costing information for decisions (strategic and others) that potentially affect capacity and consequently “fixed” as well as variable costs. In addition, ABC can also be used to pinpoint activities that would benefit from process improvements.
Metrics are very important in Operations Management within an organization because it provides functions such as control, reporting, communication, opportunities for improvement and expectations. It is a certifiable measure stated in either quantitative or qualitative terms types of measurements. In addition, metrics has different types of categories in the organizations. One of which is “Organizational Focus”, that have four different types of level within the organization or firm. 1. Organizational Metrics – this type of measure, capture and describe the performance of an organization (i.e.…market share and rate of return). 2. Product Metric – it measures cost per unit, contribution margin per unit, or growth in sales.
...th of experience in its interpretation. As a result of this, older more traditional managers may struggle to ascertain the validity of this form of metric (Maney, 2013).
Mooraj, S., Oyon, D. & Hostettler, D. (1999) 'the balanced scorecard: a necessary good or an unnecessary evil?’ European Management Journal, 17(5), 481-491.
By including financial and non-financial indicators, organizations can manage the inter-relationships between activities more effectively. Kaplan et al explained that the performance indicators included in the BSC needed to be linked to strategic goals (Fenton–O’Creevy, 2003, pp 14-6). This ensures activities are aligned with strategic goals and helps employees see how they ‘fit in to the bigger picture’.
For instance, ABC might identify a distribution channel as non-remunerative or non-value adding. Such channeling might however be non-profitable, but aid in achieving some other strategic objectives. Conclusively, the review of activity based costing benefits and shortcomings suggests that although ABC has many uses and has aided in renovating many firms, the establishment of lean accounting methods such as Economic Value Added and Balanced Scorecards that focus on eradicating cost allocations and permit thorough accounting, measurement and control systems, has made activity based costing tend to become obsolete. However, ABC still has many supporters, notably in some business-intelligence software applications and the US Marine
After a year-long research with many companies, the biggest proponents of the Balance Scorecard, Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, formulated the Balance Scorecard (BSC) measure which revolutionized the traditional thinking about performance measures. By looking beyond the traditional financial performance measures, the managers were able to better understand the strategy, positioning and performance of their company. The fundamental reason behind getting this broad assessment of the business was the BSC approach focused on predicting future performance of the company rather than just looking at the past performance and results. It enabled the managers track financial results while simultaneously linking short-term actions
The indicators that each responsible party uses to evaluate performance is different per the responsible of the department either it will be financial or non-financial (Zimmerman, 2011). The financial measure
“Using PM System doesn’t improve the performance of an organization. PM system incorporates of not only evaluating performance appraisals but also rewards. As quoted by Sheridan (2009) and Latham (2005), “the cultural maturation of performance based can take decades to implement and requires the organizations to allocate the required resources”. Technology plays a pivotal role in future of PM systems where e-monitoring of performance of employees in Hilton and other entities respectively can change the evolution of performance management thus bringing necessary and important changes to stay competitive in the market as well increasing an individual’s productivity in the company (Sheridan & Latham, 2005)”.
The balanced scorecard is a continuous, strategic analysis of the organisation from multiple perspectives commonly approached by analysing the four perspectives of financial, learning and growth, customer and internal business processes. A combination of financial and non-financial performance measures are used in this analysis. Financial information is measured in dollars or ratios of dollars and compares forecasts to actual results, whereas nonfinancial information, that cannot be measured in dollars, includes data on areas such as defect rates, throughput time and employee retention (Eldenburg et. al. 2014, p. 699). Interestingly, the Balance Scorecard MCS was developed to balance the undue emphasis of the financial performance focus of organisations, with non financial indicators, particularly in the western english speaking countries such as the United States of America and the United Kingdom (Otley 1994, p.
Tapinos, E., Dyson, R.G. & Meadows, M. (2005). The impact of performance measurement in strategic planning. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(5/6), 370-384.
Before the introduction of the balanced scorecard tool, only financial measures were used to determine the organi...
Performance management is a useful and powerful tool that can be used by managers to identify what areas of their organisation they need to improve to increase the organisation’s overall performance. The idea of a balanced scorecard enforces a sensible distribution of resources and effort across all aspect of performance an organisation is, or should be, concerned with.
When implementing a new performance management system in an organization there are both advantages and disadvantages that need to be taken into consideration by the design team. However, one of the best ways to know if a performance management system is effective is by implementing the system within the organization and then continuously monitor and reevaluate if the system is still relevant to the organizational
Yigitbasioglu, O. M., & Velcu, O. (2012). A review of dashboards in performance management: Implications for design and research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(1), 41-59.