Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
DNA evidence effect on criminal investigation
Essays about wrongful convictions
Racial profiling in the police force
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: DNA evidence effect on criminal investigation
Perfect Evidence is an episode of the weekly radio program This American Life focusing on the theme of DNA evidence. The program starts out with the story of four innocent teenagers who served fifteen years in prison for murder and concludes by recounting how legal police procedures manipulated a fourteen-year-old into falsely confessing to the murder of his sister. In both cases, the introduction of DNA evidence years later proved the innocence of all wrongfully convicted parties.
In 1986 police arrested four teenagers, Larry Ollins, Omar Saunders, and cousins Marcellius and Calvin Bradford, in connection with the rape and murder of Lori Roscetti. The young men faced the double bias of being black and having minor criminal records. The victim was a young, white, medical student. The media sensationalized the case, describing it as “a bestial, barbaric, horrifying, senseless massacre" (Glass, 2002).
The police, under enormous public pressure to solve the case, used tactics that included intimidation, coercion, false promises, and physical abuse. They offered Omar Saunders a deal: lie about being a witness to the crime, and escape charges. Saunders refused, and investigators charged him along with the rest. He is adamant that police knew he was innocent. Prosecutors offered Marcellius Bradford a similar deal. In exchange for perjuring himself in testimony against his friends, he received a twelve-year sentence. He came to deeply regret his decision, telling a reporter years later, “I will skateboard into hell” (Glass, 2002).
This was a case riddled with corruption and misconduct, from the police to the prosecutor to the judge. Although their tactics seem unethical and immoral, “the use of trickery, and even deceit, by police in...
... middle of paper ...
...es/frontline/shows/burden/etc/script.html
Cardozo, B. N. (2005). Making Up for Lost Time: What the Wrongfully Convicted Endure and How to Provide Fair Compensation. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) (Vol. 331). doi:10.1136/bmj.331.7519.719
Glass, I. (2002). Perfect Evidence Transcript. Word Journal Of The International Linguistic Association. This American Life. Retrieved from http://www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/210/transcript
Inniss, J. P. (2011). Wrongfully Convicted, 35 Years Later. Everyday Sociology Blog. Retrieved March 4, 2011, from http://www.everydaysociologyblog.com/2011/03/wrongfully-convicted-35-years-later.html
Sangaro, B., & Halpert, M. (2007). Why a Conviction Should Not Be Based On a Single Piece of Evidence: A Proposal for Reform. Jurimetrics, 48(1), 43-94. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/223209439?accountid=3588
The psychological abuse that the four suspects were exposed to made them make a wrong confession. In addition, being in an environment where the interrogation room is tight and dark increased the suspect’s anxiety. Moreover, the Frontline documentary stated that the suspects were held in custody for long hours with Robert Ford who used threatening language in order to make them confess. Not only that the suspects made a false confession, but they also told Ford different stories on how they murdered the victim. The coercive interrogatories, led Joe Dick to accept the label Ford put on him and the others. Although Ford was supposed to act just, he acted upon his self interest. Thus, he denied all facts because of fear of embarrassment of being wrong. However, after serving many years in prison, the four suspects were released to face stigmatization and labeling from the society. Indeed, this case proved that there is a malfunction in the justice system and that there’s a need for an immediate
Curtis McGhee is 17-year-old Black male who lived in Iowa. In 1977, he was charged for the murder of John Schweer who worked as a security guard at a car dealership. Later on in 1978, he was sentenced to life in prison for a murder that he never committed. Later on in 2011, McGhee was exonerated based on the police file and court’s transcript that was found, and which indicated that McGhee was a innocent man behind bars, and he was serving time for a crime that he never took in part of committing. This case of Curtis McGhee raises a question on our criminal justice system and it leads us to confirm that miscarriages of justice do occur, and there should be various reforms that should be made so these miscarriages can be prevented from occurring in the future.
``In criminal law, confession evidence is a prosecutor’s most potent weapon’’ (Kassin, 1997)—“the ‘queen of proofs’ in the law” (Brooks, 2000). Regardless of when in the legal process they occur, statements of confession often provide the most incriminating form of evidence and have been shown to significantly increase the rate of conviction. Legal scholars even argue that a defendant’s confession may be the sole piece of evidence considered during a trial and often guides jurors’ perception of the case (McCormick, 1972). The admission of a false confession can be the deciding point between a suspect’s freedom and their death sentence. To this end, research and analysis of the false confessions-filled Norfolk Four case reveals the drastic and controversial measures that the prosecuting team will take to provoke a confession, be it true or false.
If that does not occur to the reader as an issue than factoring in the main problem of the topic where innocent people die because of false accusation will. In addition, this book review will include a brief review of the qualifications of the authors, overview of the subject and the quality of the book, and as well as my own personal thoughts on the book. In the novel Actual Innocence: When Justice Goes Wrong and How to Make It Right authors Barry Scheck, Peter Neufeld, and Jim Dwyer expose the flaws of the criminal justice system through case histories where innocent men were put behind bars and even on death row because of the miscarriages of justice. Initially, the text promotes and galvanizes progressive change in the legal
Roberts, J. V., & Grossman, M. G. (2012). Why Say Sorry When I Didn't Do It? Remorse and the Dilemma of the Wrongfully Convicted. Criminal Justice in Canada: A Reader Fourth Edition. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Nelson Education Ltd
The collateral consequences of criminal convictions rather than the direct result are known as “invisible punishments”. In his article “Invisible Punishment”, Travis discusses the unintended consequences that punishes an individual beyond the formal sentence. Criminals are not only punished once for their crimes, they are punished twice, and these invisible punishments follow them throughout their lifetime. Travis explains that these punishments are a form of “Social exclusion”, not purposely designed but merely due to operation of law.
Anderson, Barrie “Marginalization and Wrongful Convictions” in Manufacturing Guilt: Wrongful Convictions in Canada, 2nd Edition, pp. 7-25. © 2009 Fernwood Publishing Co., Ltd..
On May 17, 1982, in Shreveport, Louisiana, Calvin Willis was sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for a crime he did not commit. He was convicted of brutally beating and raping a child based on three eyewitness identifications of him at trial. The case against him was substantively weak: there was no physical evidence linking him to the crime, circumstantial evidence indicated that the intruder was not him, and his pregnant wife testified at trial that he was home with her at the time. But, eyewitness testimony is viscerally powerful evidence, and the jury found Calvin guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Twenty-two years later, after DNA evidence conclusively excluded Calvin from having committed the crime, he
Police corruption is a difficult issue cities have to deal with and one of the oldest problems in the police force. Corruption can be defined as the mistreatment of public power for personal benefit or private and the use of excessive force, either emotional or physical. In this essay I will explain in detail federal indictments of Los Angeles County Sheriff officers for mistreatment of jail inmates and visitors. Another topic I will explain is the transfer of Los Angeles County Sheriff hired officers with questionable background. Finally, I will end by analyzing the hiring of new Sheriff deputies under the “Friends of the Sheriff” program.
Walsh, James, and Dan Browning. "Presumed Guilty Until Proved Innocent." Star Tribune (Minneapolis, MN). 23 Jul 2000: A1+. SIRS Issues Researcher.
Garrett, Brandon. Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 2011. 86. Print.
For years police corruption has been a major problem in American society but where is the line between moral and unethical police corruption, many modern movies address this vary issue. Some films portray how types of police corruption can have a positive influence on society, while others show the dark side of police corruption. Many law enforcement agents join the criminal justice with the basic idea of “justice for all,” however, most of them do not realize that the nice guy doesn’t always win. Even though there are vast amounts of movies which specifically address police corruption we will use three main movies for our argument today, mostly LA Confidential, however, also Training Day.
Convictions. Now Juries Expect the Same Thing – and That's a Big Problem.” U.S. News
Jain, M. (2001). Mitigating the Dangers of Capital Convictions Based on Eyewitness Testimony Through Treason's Two-Witness Rule. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 761-790.
“ ….Judgments, right or wrong. This concern with concepts such as finality, jurisdiction, and the balance of powers may sound technical, lawyerly, and highly abstract. But so is the criminal justice system….Law must provide simple answers: innocence or guilt, freedom or imprisonment, life or death.” (Baude, 21).