Perceptual Illusions Experiment: Muller-Lyer Illusion

893 Words2 Pages

Introduction
Muller-Lyer illusion is one of the most studied perceptual illusions experiment in cognitive psychology. The illusion experiment was created by Psychiatrist Franz Carl Muller-Lyer in 1889. The Muller-Lyer illusion reveals that when three horizontal lines with the same length are presented together. The first line has two outward wings at its end; the second doesn’t have wings; and the last line has two inward wings at its end. Muller-Lyer illusion says that the line with outward wings looks longer than the line without wings, and the other line with inward wings looks shorter than the one without wings. In our CogLab experiment, it is designed to have only a line with outward wings and another line that has no wings showing to the participants; their task was to choose which line is longer than the other in the experiment. In this experiment, the constant stimuli experimental method will keep the length of the line with outward wings constant throughout the experiment. The result will tell us participants’ judgments of physical length may be deluded by the presence of outward wings. Participants tend to perceive that the line with wings looks longer than a line without wings. (CogLab, Muller-Lyer Illusion, Cengage Learning)

Method
In this experiment, two vertical lines will be presented to the participants in each trial. There are 130 trials. The line with outward wings will always keep the same length. The line without wings (also known as perceived line in CogLab, Muller-Lyer Illusion, Cengage Learning) will change its length from trial to trial. Participants will be asked to choose which line is longer in each trial. Participants have to complete each trial in a few second in order to make the illusion effect...

... middle of paper ...

...ings.
According to the CogLab experiment, the Muller-Lyer illusion has been tested on 3201 participants. The results are consistent with the theory. However, I believe the experiment may be affected by the size of wings. In my opinion, I will argue that consistency of the Muller-Lyer illusion can be challenged if the size of the wings changes. If the size of wings became smaller with respect to the design of this experiment, the illusion effect can be smaller and our visual capacity can remain normal. If the size of wings became longer, for example wings are one third of the length of the line, then our visual capacity can be strongly influenced at this time. When we look at the lines, we will automatically take the length of wings into consideration. Therefore, the length of the wings can be a huge factor that challenges the consistence of the experiment result.

Open Document