I had gone to a wedding the month of October. I had gone to plenty of Hispanic weddings before but this was my first “white” wedding. I was in a location with people I had never interacted other than my coworkers as well as an environment I was unfamiliar with. I didn’t realize this setting was going to be the event I would use for my final project. The wedding was on a Sunday to begin with. Traditionally, weddings are done on Saturdays. I didn’t know whether this ceremony would end early or late. I had no clue what I was going to do since I always went to weddings with my family. Normally these weddings would be loud and full with music and I was completely aware that this wedding would be something different due to the mixed cultures between the bride and groom. The ceremony was to be Brittany’s and Marvin’s wedding. Brittany is white and her new husband is Brazilian. The ceremony didn’t start until 3 and the church was going to be at a hotel and the reception at a restaurant. I work with Brittany at Islands and she only invited maybe around 10 people from work to go to her wedding. I got ready at my friend Lexi’s house. She had asked me in advance to get ready at her place. I had a couple other co-workers get ready together at each other’s houses. I’m assuming girls my age getting ready together for an event is so they feel accompanied and don’t worry about looking like a loner when they arrive. Lexi and I got to the hotel and we walked in to the wedding together. People showed up in groups. I didn’t see a single person who walked in on their own. There were mostly dyads at the event. It was mostly couples with no children. My manager, George, and his wife had gone together. There was also a couple sitting in front of u... ... middle of paper ... ...gement. At Islands if there’s ever an issue, it’s best to get the managers and have them figure out whether the guest gets a free meal or a gift card for their next visit. The similarities between my two examples are that people help each other out and feel better when they do so. This is due to conformity. Whether it is getting ready together or cleaning at work together, communication and interaction between people is important. Better results come from working out together as a team. Sometimes, we need someone to help us better our self-esteem and do something to make us appreciate the things they do for us. They’re will be times, we’re someone’s more important or more of a favorite but then again it all depends on the role we are doing. Our actions determine our behavior. The nicer you are, the more people will help you out and take you as a consideration.
“Altruism and Indirect Reciprocity: The Interaction of Person and Situation in Prosocial Behavior” was based significantly off of the findings of the study done by David De Cremer called “Why Prosocials Exhibit Greater Cooperation then Proselfs: The Roles of Social Responsibility and Reciprocity.” Both studies preliminarily tested the college students with a social value orientation test to classify the participants as either prosocial or proself. Next, the participants participated in series of “games” that differed in each study. De Cremer used scenarios that allowed the participant to decide how many chips (a made up source of perceived value) they wanted to contribute to either a group or partner, followed by an inquiry as to how responsible they felt to “further the collective interest.” This study aimed to understand the different behaviors and feelings associated with being prosocial or proself. For example, it was found that a prosocial feel more socially responsible and want to restore equality in outcomes of situations, therefore increasing their tendency to behave cooperatively. The “Altruism and Indirect Reciprocity” study went through scenarios in which the participants would participate in “dictator games” in which they were given two opportunities to help another person, once in public the other in private. This study aimed to explain why certain people behave in prosocial ways. For example, the study found that altruists were more likely to
Solomon Asch developed and ran an experiment regarding the power of conformity that affects most populations. Psychologists have been attempting to fully understand the mental workings behind why people are so easily pressured into following others for the longest time. The main focus of psychologists, is to figure and understand what the causes are behind social conformity. Numerous terms are brought up when studying conformity. The “unspoken rules or guidelines for behavior in a group” (Hock 293) are labeled as social norms. When individuals are placed in large groups, the tendency is to lean with whatever the majority of the group thinks. The regular behavior of the individual tends to readjust to appease the superior crowd.
We can say a general understanding of altruism is a selfless behavior intended for the benefit of others at a personal cost to the individual who is preforming that behavior. These behaviors will have no obvious gain for the provider and could also have obvious costs for the one carrying out the behavior. Taking all of this into consideration can we say whether true altruism exists or not? It does not exist because no matter what you do whether it be giving a beggar a dollar or saving someone’s life you are going into a loss but you get something in return no matter what it is varying from fame to a feeling of satisfaction.
Some of the preconceptions that was challenged was my belief that all the food was going to be French. Majority of the dishes were French but some of the dishes had some American influences. The menu was mostly in French but it was also translated into English. The waiter was really friendly but he was surprised to see my friend and me there. Most of the costumers where middle aged or late 20’s adults. In addition the customers were pre-dominantly white. My friend and I were neither. What I learned about this experience was that cultural differences doesn’t necessarily have to be about going to a different ethnic place, but also seeing variances in different economic places. To clarify, Fashion Island can be a high-priced, and so this experience was more in regards of how my interaction would be through an economic lens. My friend and I weren’t dress in any fancy attire, and it was a little alarming to see how other individuals dressed well during a weekday. I felt there would be some social inequality present if there were people who wanted to eat there who didn’t look more formal or had nicer clothing. During this cultural plunge experience, I noticed the interactions of the customers and I even saw the Head Chef in one of the tables talking to a costumer. Their interactions seemed natural, and it was a different experience in seeing a Chef talking to the customers, the reason being is that I never
others in the same situation for support. Thus, they develop an exaggerated sense of belonging
In this paper I will be discussing two theories that my classmates and myself have learned about during this semester. The main objective is to explain, compare and contrast the theories using the information that we have learned inside of our text books. The two theories that I have chosen to use are the social bonding theory and the self-control theory. I chose these theories because these were the two that I was most interested in during my time of study.
I was fortunate to be able to attend the Spring Jazz Gala at the High School. Before entering the auditorium or even the school, I had high expectations that this would be like one of the concerts I used to perform in when I was in High School. We called it “Night at the Pops”. One of the highlights of our concert was the informal attire. We got to wear jeans and a different colored t shirt each year. The fun thing about the t-shirt is many people in band and choir designed a new design each year for the shirt. It was then voted on by all of us and whoever won had it plastered on the front of ALL the shirts! So, when I think about my assumptions and what I observed during this Spring Jazz Gala, they were definitely different. During this performance, I sat in the auditorium not a gym like what I had envisioned. The lights were dim like you were going to watch a play and the attire of the students were very sophisticated. You would find the gents wearing black suits with bow ties and the dames with elegant black dresses. Even though this wasn’t what I expected for this performance, I wasn’t too shocked because when I performed in high school, our attire was similar for all of our other concerts. We all wore black pants, white shirts, and
Conformity is defined as the occurrence of people yielding to social pressures as a result of pressure from a group of their peers; when faced by the pressure to conform, people will alter their behaviour and actions to fit the norm demonstrated by their peers (Lilienfield et al., 2012). Conformity is studied so that is can be understood and used in society to facilitate positive outcomes, and help avoid situations where peoples’ predisposition to conform leads to negative consequences (Lilienfield et al., 2012). By understanding conformity and other social processes society as a whole is able to understand themselves better and motivates them to work on improving as a whole (Lilienfield et al., 2012).
culture and during an important event such as a wedding it is not unusual to
The behavior of altruism in an individual is when it brings more costs than benefits for the benefit of another individual. Altruism comes from the Latin word "Alter" which means "the others." This translation of alturism describes it relatively well. Another great definition of altruism can be found in a statement of Edward Osborne Wilson, an American biologist. According to Wilson, "Altruism is defined in biology, as in everyday life, as a self-destructive
Glasser believes that humans are genetically social creatures and need other people. He suggests that the cause of almost all psychological symptoms is an inability to get along with the important peopl...
...; With the use of applying this theory to an episode as a demonstration, an application, and then an explanation, it is easy to see how the Social Exchange theory is related to everyday situations. Not only can the theory be applied to amorous relationships, but to that of friendships. The utility of the theory is seen in just about every type of interaction and is key to better understanding why relationships, friendships, or any mutual interaction, for that matter, turn out being costly or rewarding.
Individualism is rampant in our world. More and more people are concerned with what they want, when they want it and how they want it. They put blinders on and go about their work, convinced that “looking out for number one” is the only way to succeed and find happiness. If everyone were to adopt this way of thinking and living, the world would become violently competitive, gloomy, and callous. However, if we open our lives and give service to those less fortunate than ourselves, we allow our hearts to receive immeasurable happiness. There are countless members of society, who make service and ultimately self-sacrifice a part of their everyday lives. One of the greatest examples the world has of a self-sacrificing person is Mother Teresa. She said, “In this life we cannot do great things. We can only do small things with great love… It is not the magnitude of our actions but the amount of love that is put into them that matters.” Doctors Without Borders is a powerful humanitarian organization that was most recently volunteering in Haiti. Part of their mission statement reads, “…We unite direct medical care with a commitment to bearing witness and speaking out against the underlying causes of suffering. Our aid workers and staff protest violations of humanitarian law on behalf of populations who have no voice, and bring the concerns of their patients to public forums…” These are just two mainstream examples of people and organizations that live and work for others, to improve the quality of their lives.
It was on September 9th at the Austin360 Amphitheater and it had started a seven that night. At this concert was a mixture of artist such as Chris Brown, Omarion, Kid Ink, Fetty Wap, French Montana, and Teyana Taylor. The concert was called One Hell of a Nite Tour. From the many different topics we have learned in Sociology I noticed that there was only a specific group of people at this concert. When I had looked around I noticed that it was only people within the age range of about 18-25. Most of the people I talked to there were college students. It was a mixture of all races but it was diverse. You could easily tell who the wealthy was and who did not have much money. The wealthy people sat up close to the performers, while the ones with not much money was on the
On a daily basis, people are being influenced by the people around them, whether it is directly or indirectly. A person’s thoughts, feelings and actions can influence and be influenced by society. These social interactions provide enough opportunity for the presence of people to influence and change behavior, views, and attitudes of an individual. There are several forms of social influences, such as conformity, which I will be discussing. Why we conform has been a topic of considerable interest to social psychologists in particular such as he classic and well-known studies of Muzafer Sherif and Solomon Asch. In addition to researching why we conform, there’s also the question of whether conformity is good or bad.