Pakistan is Better off Being Ruled by a Dictator than by a Democratically Elected Government

1189 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Social stability is a danger

“Democracy is the government of the people, by the people, for the people” (Lincoln), whereas dictatorship is a form of government working under a single man. In other words, democracy is distributing the power among people and the dictatorship is centralizing the power under one person. Since partition, Pakistan has faced several democratic and dictatorial governments and still it is stumbling between both forms of government. Views about whether democracy or dictatorship is better for Pakistan vary from person to person. However, this issue cannot be solved through emotional talk, rather logical explanations and accurate evidences are required for the best possible conclusion. Although, many argue that Pakistan is better off being ruled by a democratic government however, this is not the case because of, inefficient decision making in democratic govenments , high illiteracy rate in Pakistan, in transparent voting system and diversity of social fabric of Pakistan.

Firstly, in a democratic government decisions are made slowly, on the basis of personal gains and satisfaction of voters and not for the prosperity of people and betterment of the country while on the other hand in a dictatorship decision making is efficient and fast. Decisions are made to promote progress in a country. In a democratic government decisions are usually made for political scoring and the main purpose behind making a decision is to attract the attention of people. In fact, the authority of decision making is used as a tool of getting more votes. Moreover, the areas of followers are preferred for progressive projects while areas of opponents are ignored which gives a rise to social instability. As a result, specific part of the country is gets prosperous w...

... middle of paper ...

...guage as a dictatorial government avoids the social instability by taking prepositions of a few wise men into account when making economic and political decisions So, it can be said that dictatorship is the best form of governance for Pakistan or atleast the best available.

Works Cited

Lincoln, Abraham. "The Gettysburg Address by Abraham Lincoln." Abraham Lincoln Online. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2014. .

Hussain, Akmal. "Institutions, Individuals and the National Crisis." Daily Times. N.p., 10 Oct. 2002. Web. 16 Mar. 2014. .

Pakistan Elections 2013. "Pakistan Election 2013 Summary." Pakistan Election 2012-2013. N.p., n.d. Web. 16 Mar. 2014. .

Show More
Related

  • Abraham Lincoln's Famous Address, And The Rise Of A President

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    Lincoln’s Famous Address written by Roselynn Marquez talks about how Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address was only 270 words, and it followed a two hour introduction by Edward Everett. Being short was not the only memorable point that the speech had. “Another was the simplicity of its language. As historian Allen Guelzo notes, ‘the address relies on crisp, plain vocabulary.’ He points out that most of the words are only one-syllable. Doris Kearns Goodwin concludes, ‘Lincoln had translated the story of his country...into words and ideas accessible to every American.’ By making his ideas easy to grasp, Lincoln gave them directness and power” (Marquez). The Gettysburg Address to this day is known as a unforgettable expression inscribing the war that took on in the country. In summarization, Abraham Lincoln is known widely for the Address he made in Gettysburg after the battle that took place

    Read More

  • Lincoln At Gettysburg: The Words That Remade America

    1132 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lincoln at Gettysburg: The Words That Remade America "Fourscore and seven years ago…." These are the first 5 of only two hundred seventy-two words that remade America. In Lincoln at Gettysburg: The Words That Remade America, the author, Gary Wills, informed us that Abraham Lincoln wanted equality among us and to unite as one. In Abraham Lincoln's own speech, he would not mention single individuals or even top officers. Everyone was considered as equal importance and was never any different. "Though we call Lincoln's text the Gettysburg Address, that title clearly belongs to Everett." 1 This is very true, which I think is interesting. Everett who was chosen by David Wills to commemorate the National Cemetery of Gettysburg, was supposed to be the speaker while Lincoln was only the dedicatory remarks speaker. Not only did Lincoln have the favorable speech, it was only three minutes while Everett's was two hours long. Lincoln also supposedly was not supposed to be there to speak; he actually just told a correspondent that he would be present. It's amazing to believe that a two hundred seventy-two word speech would say so much to thousands of people.

    Read More

  • Diction In The Gettysburg Address

    663 Words  | 2 Pages

    The speech “Gettysburg address” was written November 19 1863, almost four years after the first shots of the civil war happened in fort sumter . This speech was so impactful and it was only two minutes long. This two minute speech was one of many impactful speeches in history. Abraham Lincoln wrote the speech “ Gettysburg address” . During the civil war a lot of the soldiers had died. Family members were grieving over the loss of loved ones, and friends. Abraham Lincoln made this speech for the people who lost family members or loved ones in the war. This speech honored those who have fallen on the battlefield and remind those why we had a civil war. Abraham Lincoln reminded the soldiers what they were fighting for in the first place , that they can move forward from the loss of soldiers in “ Gettysburg Address “ using repetition and diction .

    Read More

  • The Gettysburg Address Paper

    936 Words  | 2 Pages

    Abraham Lincoln, Former president and also a general in the war, gave a speech to uphold and encourage the spirits of the weary soldiers in his army. The speech was called the Gettysburg Address. Lincoln was very specific and delicate with his tone in order to encourage the weak, acknowledge the deceased, and motivate the detoured.

    Read More

  • Economic and Moral Issues Causing The American Civil War

    1129 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Abraham Lincoln." Council on Foreign Relations. Council on Foreign Relations, n.d. Web. 10 Apr. 2014.

    Read More

  • Juxtaposition In The Gettysburg Address

    1025 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Gettysburg,Pennsylvania on November 19th, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln gave one of the most famous speeches in this county’s history. The ten sentence famous speech was given one of the bloodiest sites of the Civil

    Read More

  • Pathos In The Gettysburg Address

    822 Words  | 2 Pages

    ‘’Four score and seven years ago…’’(Lincoln, 1) You’ve probably heard those six words before, right? On November 19, 1863, President Abraham Lincoln delivered ‘’The Gettysburg Address’’. Abraham Lincoln’s purpose in ‘’The Gettysburg Address’’ was to persuade listeners to finish what those who fought for died for by treating everyone else equally. ‘’The Gettysburg Address’’ is the most compelling speech due to its use of rhetorical devices.

    Read More

  • Faulkner's “A Rose For Emily”

    715 Words  | 2 Pages

    Beardsley, Frank. "American History: The American Civil War: Lincoln's Gettysburg Address (VOA Special English 2005-04-20)." Interesting Things for ESL/EFL Students (Fun English Study). Www.manythings.org. Web. 12 June 2011. .

    Read More

  • Does Democracy Work?

    849 Words  | 2 Pages

    Democracy: a government by the people, in which citizens rule either directly or through elected representatives - the latter description more relevant to today’s societies. Quite evidently, democracy is not perfect; like any other political system, it is subject to a plethora of flaws. For instance, it is no secret that voters tend to make illogical decisions – not out of sheer malice, but as a result of being wrongly informed. Politicians also make erroneous choices, whether they do so because they are dishonest or simply out of touch with the true will of their constituents. Further, anyone who has studied the government of a parliamentary democracy knows gerrymandering can have a powerful say in determining elections. Despite these and other flaws however, democracy still seems to work.

    Read More

  • Democracy in Latin America

    2755 Words  | 6 Pages

    Firstly, K. Isbester mentions that democracy has a different meaning for everyone, as some can define democracy as a good aspect for development, on the contrary other believe that it is nothing more than voting after several years. Although, Latin America see democratic g...

    Read More

  • Democracy Is The Worst Form Of Government

    1302 Words  | 3 Pages

    What is democracy? Democracy a form of government in which the people freely elect representatives to govern them in a country, democracy guarantees free and fair elections, basic personal and political rights and independent court of law. There are two types of democracy, direct and indirect democracy. Direct democracy or pure democracy is where there is direct participate of the people; people make decisions for them instead of letting them representative make decision for them. Indirect democracy the decisions are made by the representative on behalf of the people that voted for them. All over the world people are having different views with regard to democracy and how it operates. “It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried” ~ Winston Churchill, some have said democracy is the worst government form of government which I also think it’s! Due to the how it operates.

    Read More

  • Idi Amin Dada: Authoritarian Leadership

    2327 Words  | 5 Pages

    In his book International Politics on the World Stage John T. Rourke (2008) states that governments range from the strict authoritarian at one end of the spectrum to a completely unfettered democracy at the other end (p. 78). His definition of an authoritarian style government is a “political system that allows little or no participation in decision making by individuals and groups outside the upper reaches of the government” (p. G-1). Those of us who live in a country that has a democratic government may find it difficult to understand why people who live in countries with authoritarian governments do not revolt and change their system of government, but in fact a truly democratic system of government is a relatively new concept in the age of man.

    Read More

  • Swift's Model Of Democracy

    1881 Words  | 4 Pages

    Democracy is robust, widely accepted and highly anticipated around the world. It is the triumphant form of government; dominantly used in Europe, North and South and America and becoming reformed and taking new roots in Africa and Asia. Although the term democracy is based on its Greek origin, demos kratos, meaning people rule, the term cannot be simply understood as such. Due to vast coverage, the adaptation of democracy has varied greatly, whether regionally, nationally, by state or through different branches of government. Perhaps this can be advantageous when the different categorizations listed above can use democracy to rule and suit themselves best, but other factors, such as globalization and neoliberalism, has caused the need for

    Read More

  • Natural Law vs. Conventional Law

    1051 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the end, democracy is the best form of government. It gives people a say in who should rule, it allows the best decisions to be made, and laws that are fair and just according to the majority of that societies’ needs. This can provide a very good and peaceful country, and that’s why democracy is a better form of government than oligarchy, dictatorship, communism, or monarchy. Government is needed to control and bring peace to a society, which other forms of government cannot do to the best of their ability due to their structure. In conclusion, democracy is the best form of government for the people.

    Read More

  • Political Legitimacy And Political Authority

    1264 Words  | 3 Pages

    Democracy, in its truest sense, does not exist. There is no political authority currently existing where every person contributes an equal amount to the decision-making process of the authority’s directives. The election of officials and representatives by the populace does not, in itself, automatically result in the most democratic and widely accepted directives being enacted. However, this does not decrease the political power of the authorities, nor does it limit their practical power over their jurisdictions.

    Read More

More about Pakistan is Better off Being Ruled by a Dictator than by a Democratically Elected Government

Open Document