Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religious unity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religious unity
All throughout human history, there has been much violence and bloodshed caused by religion. From the Crusades to the modern Israel-Palestine conflict, different religions have consistently found new ways to not get along with each other. In the film Gandhi, it is shown that it is possible for those of different religions to cooperate and work together as rational human beings, but it is far easier for them to lose their heads and resort to acts of violence. Several Christians found it possible to follow Gandhi, and in one case even convert to Hinduism. When Gandhi told a Hindu to adopt a Muslim child and raise it as his own child and also as a Muslim, the man understood that Gandhi was right. He knew that it would be hard to do, but also that it would be possible and the right thing to do. It was possible for him to rise above the barriers of religion, and hopefully fulfill Gandhi’s command. Gandhi found it paramount that the world manages to work together, regardless of religion, race, or ethnicity, so important that he nearly starved himself several times in order to stop fighting. Had Gandhi not been a part of India’s revolution, the history of India’s independence would have been tarnished by acts of violence and terrible acts of inhumanity.
Christianity and Hinduism managed to interact in a fairly positive way throughout the film. A Christian minister traveled India’s countryside with Gandhi, and managed to befriend many Indians during his travels. In the scene with him climbing onto the train, the Indians (presumably Hindus) atop the train cars help him up and reassure him that they would be safe up there. However, the Hindu-Christian relations are hardly interesting when compared to the Hindu-Muslim relationship. There a...
... middle of paper ...
...to extreme extents to end all violence. The relatively small amount of British soldiers in India could have never kept down the millions and millions of Indians, and luckily Gandhi was alive to make sure that they did not try to kill all of the British. Without his presence India would have been destroyed by war and violence.
Muslims and Hindus can live together perfectly well. They are all people, and they can all tolerate each other. However, toleration is not always the end product. Too often these groups manage to forget that they are not so alike and allow their religions to get in the way, even though their religions do not have to. A Hindu is a Muslim is a Christian is a Buddhist is a Human Being. They are not different at all, and they do not need to fight. However, this can easily be forgotten. The world needs Mahatma Gandhi’s to remind the world of this.
Mohandas Gandhi was born into a Hindu family of the Vaisya caste. This was the third ranking caste in the class structure of Hinduism. This class was for farmers and merchants. The whole system was so complex that in Gandhi’s lifetime it had begun to disintegrate. Gandhi’s father and grandfather were not farmers or merchants. They were prime ministers of the tiny principality of Porbandar in Gujarat. Mohandas was extremely shy. He rushed to and from school, too nervous to talk to any of his classmates. Then a pretty and strong-willed girl was married to him by an arranged marriage at the age of 13. Her name was Kasturbai. A marriage at this age was typical in Hindu custom. He was a strict husband and kept control over actions. Kasturbai disliked this. They didn’t spend more than the first five years of their marriage together, since it was typical for the girl to visit her family. At this point in his life, he was very depressed. He was little and suffered fears that didn’t bother his wife. An athletic and older boy who was Muslim fascinated him. He told Mohandas to eat meat if he wanted to become bigger and stronger. He said the Indians were weak and small people, because they didn’t eat meat, and this is why the British, who did, had the strength to rule over them. This was against his religion, but he tried anyway. He ate the meat in secrecy, but after a few meals he stopped. He didn’t like the taste of meat and fe...
Try living in a society where starving children lay on the streets looking for food, or where lack of education leads you nowhere. However, a man with knowledge and wealth helped his people fight for their rights. Gandhi’s background made him who he was; giving him an idea of how to get India’s independence, and impact on India helped people realized you can fight with knowledge and nonviolence to change a way of life.
“My ambition is no less than to convert British people through nonviolence and thus make them see the wrong they have done to India.” (Document A, Paragraph Two) Gandhi clearly said he did not want to hurt the Europeans, he believed the Europeans forcing ways of life on the Indians was unjust, but he did not want to respond with any negative emotions. This peaceful approach remained a tactic within the movement because as Gandhi held firm to it, his loyal followers mimicked that as well. Gandhi’s words to Lord Irwin, “I do not intend to hurt a single Englishman.” (Document A, Paragraph One), were proven to be truthful ones when six years later the march at Dharasana occurred. While police begin to beat his followers with steel clubs, Gandhi’s peaceful remained cemented within them all. “Not one of the marchers even raised an arm to fend off the blows.” (Document B, Paragraph
...es of past leaders Gandhi gained new perspective and subsequently avoided repeating the past; this lead him to attempt to embark upon a new path--one perceived as better for India. None of this would have been possible without the perspective gained through studying India’s brutal past. Subsequently his efforts and strategies were later emulated by other civil rights activists, effectively impacting the general society. Clearly, the perspective gained through looking back on one’s mistake would be impossible without adversity, which serves as the origin for remediation; society would not be able to progress without certain duress.
The English word religion loosely translates into “rules” in Latin. Therefore, a religion teaches us how to think, how to act, and basically everything except what to eat in the morning. The Hindu and Christian religion agree on many things and our society follows some of the rules too because religion and laws are based on humanity. From holy literature many different ideas have been pawned but they are all supposed to lead you to the same things: a happy, healthy life, contribution to the world around us, and some kind of liberation after death. Concerning these ideals the Hindu religion has come up with three ways to make sure that everybody will get what they want out of life and those are the four stages, the four goals, and the four castes of life. There is so much holy war about which religion is right and wrong but if they all are striving for the same thing it is hard for me to see why they take place. In this essay I will show that Christianity is very similar to Hinduism.
The Hindu religion holds on to the idea that beliefs are what determines ones thought and attitude about life, which also directs a person’s actions. It’s the actions of a person that creates their destiny. Christianity follows in a similar pattern as a person’s actions and attitude towards life will have an effect as a Christian. While the Hindu’s believe in one Supreme Being they also believe in the laws of karma and reincarnation. There is one very important similarity between Christianity and Hinduism. The Hindus as well as the Christians share the belief that no religion teaches the only way to God’s salvation and that all religious paths are facets of God’s light, equally deserving of understanding and tolerance.
...s that included satyagraha, or hold to the truth. This prevented bloody revolts like those of Egypt.. For example, when the British placed a high tax on salt, Gandhi led 50,000 people on a 200 mile march to the sea to make their own salt. Gandhi was taken to prison many times. Gandhi was able to work with Jawaharalal Nehru, a young lawyer to receive reforms from the British. The British finally granted a constitution in 1935 which was a beginning step towards independence.
Watching this movie on Mahatma Gandhi start a revolution in the India really expanded my understanding of the Indian culture. To begin with, Mahatma Gandhi is a man that is fueled by religion. It is said that Gandhi does not believe that there are other religions out there but rather implies that other regions out there are all teachings of the same religion but just different parts. Throughout the course, we have talked a bunch about religion and it is in fact a truth saying that to an Indian person, religion is a very important and crucial part of his or her life. Being a Hindu, I can tell you from first hand experience that religion is a very
...oes not hide the actual discrimination that is present in every single aspect of the Hinduism lifestyle. I’m sure that this is fine with some of those that are in the higher caste of Hindu society since the effect this bias has is not a detriment for them. However, I am also sure that there are many born into the lower classes that realize they have more to offer to society than their religion tells them they do. These examples show that, although the multiplicity of Hinduism may reflect the recognition that people are different, it does so in a discriminatory and biased manner.
...Because of Gandhi’s power, his flaw, and his catastrophe, one would say that Gandhi fits the model of a Greek tragic hero. Gandhi’s power was his heightened goodness, proven by his innumerable civil disobedience acts, where he continued to fight even while he was regularly jailed. His flaw was his tolerance and acceptance of everyone which led to his catastrophic assassination by Nathuram Godse. Gandhi’s teachings of nonviolence and peace still live on today, as they have inspired many other human rights leaders, such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela. Gandhi’s teachings are responsible for the successes of civil rights movements in other countries. He not only helped free India from British rule, but also gave people new thoughts about violence and imperialism around the world. Even today, India continues to live and remember the tutelage of Gandhi.
India is the center of a very serious problem in the world today. It’s a very diverse place with people from many different religious backgrounds, who speak many different languages and come from many different regions. They are also separated economically. Two of the country’s religious sects, Muslims and Hindus, have been in conflict for hundreds of years. Their feelings of mistrust and hatred for each other are embedded in all those years and will not leave easily. What’s most disturbing is that there seems to be no plan for reconciliation available. There are numerous reasons for this conflict.
Conflict and violence is around us throughout the world and the mass media has made a huge impact of what we think of violence and the relation to religion, especially in the last couple of years. In addition violence has been considered as being part of human nature and comes from our biological structure of aggression. It is an out let for us to relieve stress levels and some believe that it can be a device of vengeance and a positive mechanism to human survival. For example it is a system for the survival of the fittest and reproduction. Another way that we can look at it on a different spectrum is the way religious beliefs utilise non violent mechanisms that try to diminish the impacts of aggressive behaviour. When we think of religion and violence we do not think to situate them together. This is because “theologically, it can certainly be concluded that all religions have the goal of peace” . People who are outsider of a religious tradition can make many generalisations. In this essay it will discuss why some religious traditions in South East Asia oppose violence. In addition the rejections of violence have shaped and changed religious practices within Jainism, Hinduism and Buddhism. There have also been many generalisations about the above traditions. Moreover I will try and answer why non violence has become a generalisation and how it has impacted India as a whole.
Gandhi is motivated by religious means; he believes that everyone is equal in God’s eyes. He gets involved in several movements for equality, and he stresses non-violence very strongly. The Indians are very mad because British rule continues to limit their rights. They are supposed to all get fingerprinted, and their marriage laws are invalid. Gandhi’s followers vow to fight their oppressors to the death, but he discourages them from violence.
Despite numerous conflicts with the British and with the Muslims, India fought for its rights by doing what they felt was right. India under the British rule had some benefits as the new school system and outlawing sati but they did manage to trouble the Indians with taxation and other laws. Gandhi who was an outstanding, important figure in India’s way for independence who taught to fight with nonviolence.
Ever wonder what to do when you are in a situation that most people react in violence? Ever think that violence is the only way out? Mahatma Gandhi is a very inspirational role model who not only reacted to violence without violence but overcame it and (for the most part) succeeded in life without violence. He was a victim of bullying and segregation and looked past the odds and was inspirational for many people.