Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Organizational management theories
Organizational development research paper
Organization theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Organizational management theories
This is a study to examine the background of various organization theories and their development from the perspective of legitimacy and efficacy; to evaluate selected discussions regarding theory development and various theories; to encourage the use of evidence based theory development and to provide a look into the model and related theories that are created after looking at the existing theories. While not rejecting the need for thorough testing of theories, I am simply looking into the suggestion of theories and models for their worth. Only is that when we begin to thoroughly looking into the application of the theories, that they can then be tested in conditions of their authenticity and the level that they are useful. This test my lead us to suggests that there can be many more useful new and improved organizational theories as well as new additions and variations of other theories that may have been or are in the process of being developed. For some, the thought of getting these theories considered for authenticity and their usefulness can and do range from reasonable questions to disregard as some people can and do struggle and debate over just the idea of new or improved ideas(Miles, McKenny, Short, Davis, Wu).
As I read through the article, I began to develop an understanding of and appreciation for the history background of why the use of the management and organization theory is very useful. It became clear to me that while management and organization theorists also are aware that the times are changing and they need to change significantly their method of thought. While a lot of the business planning outlook plans has become shorter, an aggressive pressure is on the rise. This is leading to a...
... middle of paper ...
... that it is necessary for theorist, researchers and authors to come to a decision on the possible outcome on the development of a solid and majority approved thought process to drive organizational theory and research to its full potential (Miles, McKenny, Short, Davis, Wu). As there are many articles appearing with several new theories and models, is can be possible that this quest for a majority approved model will cause some to discard the findings because they consider any of the new theories and models outside the normal idea of thought to be not in line with the traditional thought process.
Works Cited
Jones, J.R., (2010). Organizational theory, design and change, (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education
Miles, Z., McKenny, A., Short, J., Davis, K., Wu, D. (2011). Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, DOI: 10.1007/s11747-011-0252-7
Weick, K. and Quinn, R. (1999) ‘Organizational Change and Development’, Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 50 (1), pp. 361—386
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2013). Reframing Organizations (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Boje, D. M. , Luhman, J. T. , and Cunliffe, A. L. “ A Dialectic Perspective on the Organization
Kanter, R.M., Stein, B.A. and Jick, T.D. (1992) The Challenge of Organizational Change (New York: The FreePress).
Compare and contrast the management theories of Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, Elton Mayo, and Douglas McGregor. In what sense(s) are these theories similar and/or compatible? In what sense(s) are these theories dissimilar and/or incompatible? How would a contingency theorist reconcile the points of dissimilarity and/or incompatibility between these approaches? The twentieth century has brought in a number of management theories which have helped shape our view of management in the present business environment.
Organizational structure is one of the three key organizational assets that could contribute to the effectiveness of operations of any organization (Zheng, Yan and Mclean 2009) It is joined together by different flows of information, decision processes, hierarchy of authority, specialization and working materials. (Enz 2009; Mintzberg 1980) Furthermore, it also determines the operating workflow, control of information, decision-making in the organization and the line authority (Mintzberg 1980). The facets of the organizational structure, the relationships that exist within it, and how the business processes (Bititci et al 2011) are controlled, determine the managerial style that should be utilized in addition to the strategies the organization could implement. Going further, a company’s organizational design and the parts that constitute it are seen as a contributing factor to superior performance, which ultimately provide an organization with competitive advantage over its competitors. (Enz 2009; Zheng, Yang, and Mclean 2009)
Kaufman, Roger and Watkins, Ryan. "Cost-Consequence Analysis." Human Resource Development Quarterly, v7 n1 p87-100, Spr 1996.
McDaniel, C., & Gates, R. (2007). Marketing research essentials (6th ed.). Noboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2008). Reframing organizations. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
Stewart, M. (2010). Theories x and y, revisited. Oxford Leadership Journal, 1(3), 1-5. Retrieved from www.oxfordleadership.com/journal/vol1_issue3/stewart.pd
Gibson, J.L., Ivancevich, J.M., Donnelly, J.H., & Konopaske, R. (2009). Organizations: Behaviors, structure, processes (13th ed.) New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Stephen Robbins and A.J.B UBRIN think organisational behavior (OB) includes three interrelated influence and contact area of research: the behavior of the individual level, the group level and the organisational level behavior.
Jones, G. R. (2010). Organizational theory, design, and change. 6th Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
According to Hatch and Cunliffe (2006), there are three major perspectives about the study of organization theory (OT): modern, symbolic interpretive, and postmodern. Each of these perspectives comes with its own assumptions and methodologies. Hatch and Cunliffe provided an introduction text about the concepts and characteristics of the three OT perspectives. Tsoukas and Knudsen also compiled a comprehensive handbook summarizing all facets of the meta-theoretical perspectives. In this post the writer will discuss the basic concepts of three perspectives, present Hatch and Cunliffe’s reasons why a multiple perspectives approach to organization theory is important, and compare Tsoukas and Knudsen’s introduction to the Hatch and Cunliffe introduction in their books.
Early Theories of Organizations emerged mainly for military and Catholic Church. The metaphor of the machine was dominant, where organizations are viewed as machines. Therefore, the organizational application was, since workers behave predictably (as machines do rarely deviate from the norm), management knows what to expect, and workers operating outside expectations are replaced.