Observation Analysis of the Types of Groups at Langdon Cafeteria

1449 Words3 Pages

The behavior I observed was the types of groups people sat with when studying and socializing in the Lakefront on Langdon Cafeteria. I choose to observe this behavior for two reasons. One, as I was sitting in the Lakefront on Langdon Cafeteria Wednesday the 20th of November, I started to take record of the people around me. I spend a lot of time in Memorial Union doing homework, studying, meeting with people, eating lunch, and in general, relaxing. I find the combination of open study spaces, food options, and quiet study areas to be a great combination to increase productivity without feeling like being stuck in a stuffy library. I was curious about the interactions of people in this area and if they were similar to mine or if they were different. After about thirty minutes or so, I noticed that there were people sitting alone, and there were people sitting with groups. I began to notice that men were sitting with men and women were sitting with women, for the most part. I was unsure if this was an exemption or if this was a type of social norm and rule in the cafeteria. I initially wanted to observe the types of activities the people were doing in the Lakefront on Langdon Cafeteria, but at the end of my unstructured observation I realized it was difficult to determine exactly what actions people were performing and it was more interesting that people seemed to be segregating themselves based on gender. Two, I had never noticed this gender divide before and found it interesting. On most of my visits to the union, I am with at least one other person, sometimes they are the same gender and sometimes not. I was curious if this behavior I was noticing was also just a one-time-deal or if this was a recurring trend. For these reasons, ...

... middle of paper ...

...port I stated that the "assumed race" of the individuals was recorded in the comments section of the structured observation guide sheet. The reason this was added is because I could only assume what races people were from an observation standpoint. I had to make generalities, I could not 100% determine the actual race of each individual. The race classifications were general and could possibly not be accurate.
Although these two observation periods showed a separation and segregation of groups based on race and gender, a greater number of observations would have to be conducted to create a general rule for how groups are divided within the cafeteria. At different times of the day or different weekdays, the make-up of groups could change drastically. Two observations of a little over 100 people cannot accurately and definitively generalize how groups are constructed

More about Observation Analysis of the Types of Groups at Langdon Cafeteria

Open Document