Project Yellowtone Vs General Motors Essay

1210 Words3 Pages

“We as a corporation cannot afford to have union automobile plants in the United States any more than the union can….We cannot compete with a nonunion company building automobiles at the prices I think they can do it at in the country” (pg.103 Reynolds, 1986). Alfred Warren, GM Labor Relation Vice President was unable to conceive the thought of nonunion companies making automobiles in the United States, but that day is here. Right-to-work states have seen a significant increase in the amount of automobile companies opening plants in their states. These jobs are not controlled by the UWA and give companies true freedom of the way they conduct business. The question however is how and why has the idea of nonunion companies creating automobiles …show more content…

Several companies have attempted to flee the UAW and have even moved internationally to do so. In 1999, General Motors attempted to change the way they manufactured automobiles and use modular productions. General Motors’ “Project Yellowstone” would save the company billions of dollars. “…GM's "Project Yellowstone" never got anywhere. The United Auto Workers screamed of job losses and GM, leery of a strike, retreated. "The word 'modular' is no longer in GM's vocabulary," was the concession in February from Donald Hackworth, GM's senior vice president of manufacturing” (Jones, Terril Yue, Forbes, 2000). The company Dana Corps partnered with DaimlerChrysler and moved to Brazil. General Motors and the UWA have been “partners” since the beginning of the auto industry, so why would the UWA hinder General Motors from saving money, and fostering new business relationships. One might say the UWA is trying to preserve jobs as UWA President Stephen P. Yokich stated “Just another way to destroy good-paying jobs” ( Jones, Terril Yue, Forbes, 2000). The UWA is an organization like any other out to preserve and keep jobs at any cost. The UWA realize that the state of the auto industry is changing, and so is the economy. The UWA may need to seek other means of creating and maintaining business relationships, jobs, and techniques. The article Body Blocked also mentioned “A University of Michigan study says 74,000 union jobs would be lost to modular production if it were adopted in the U.S., mostly because jobs would move from unionized auto plants to nonunionized parts suppliers” (Jones, Terril Yue, Forbes, 2000). Modular production may be the least of the UWA’s worries since companies are finding alternatives to doing business in the Rust

Open Document