Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Slaves in the 18th century
Slaves in the 18th century
Racism in America during the 19th century
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Slaves in the 18th century
The New York Conspiracy Trials happened in New York during the year 1741. Before this year, countless other slave revolts occurred that made the New Yorkers anxious and nervous for an uprising. During the particularly cold winter of 1741, many whites were afraid that slave revolts would happen again. On top of that, New York had helped Britain against Spain. Countless of these worried folks thought that the slaves (along with some poor whites) and the Spanish were going to work together to overthrow New York. The conspiracy trials proved that all New Yorkers understood the hierarchies of status, race, and gender, even when they imagined overturning some of them.
Originally, there were no conspiracy allegations. At first, it began as a simple robbery. Three slaves (Prince, Cuffee, and Caesar) robbed Rebecca Hogg`s tiny shop near the East River docks in New York City. A little more than two weeks after the theft; however, Fort George, the garrison that contained the governor`s mansion, caught fire. Fires were a common occurrence back in the eighteenth-century, and many thought there was little cause for alarm. However, the pace of the fires soon accelerated. According to Sabrina Zabin, “The rumor, moreover, that a slave had been seen sprinting away from a burning building made some wonder if these fires were due to arson rather than accident.”
Daniel Horsmanden, a Supreme Court justice who was to hear of the trials of the Hogg robbery, surmised that there was a connection between the fires and the theft. Horsmanden was a very racist man and he and other white New Yorkers suspected a citywide conspiracy. The destruction of the city`s fort made the New Yorkers think a foreign attack was to happen. The citizens asked, was this an ...
... middle of paper ...
...mporarily. As an indentured servant, Mary Burton was not a person of standing. She was sixteen, poor, dependent, without a family, and female. Why would anyone have believed her testimony? Some people did mistrust what she said because she was a servant, but others did trust her because they knew she was a witness. No one ever questioned what she said because she was a woman. She told the people exactly what they wanted to hear. Burton probably felt dissatisfied with her current position, and wanted to “get back” at the people in power. At first, she accused only slaves and poor whites, the people the rest of society hated. However, she soon started accusing prominent New Yorkers. This made people stop believing her, but by this time, the government had already given her so much money that she paid off her debt and became a free woman, never to be heard from again.
The Abigail Hobbs trial was one of many of the Salem Witch Trial. People often had to face the court for a crime they did not do commit. Fortunately enough Abigail Hobbs was one of the people accused who was somewhat educated. Her tone and behavior was calm and collected while facing the people who determined her faith. Some people who were charged with these crimes were uneducated and could not defend themselves. Abigail Hobbs went along with court when she was on trial she agreed with them to hopefully save her life.
“…and on the charge that the prisoner did with others to conspire to destroy the lives of soldiers in the military service of the United States in violation of the laws and customs of war-Guilty” were the words that soared out of Wallace’s mouth at the end of the trial. It was then that Henry Wirz was found guilty. Why? Why was he found guilty? This decision was based on the emotional aspect of the witnesses, and not by the actual guilt. Not only my defense, but also the defense of Wirz’s attorney, Baker, the testimony of the defendant, Henry Wirz, shows that Wirz should not have been found guilty.
The challenges and difficulties slaves faced at the time of Celia’s trial left white Americans viewing them with little entitlements. Celia’s trial brought a new perspective into society in a time where slaves, especially females, were without hope. Her story was a beneficial challenge to the institution of slavery because it reached the thoughts of many involved in the controversy during the 1850s and left an effect on the standards of
Rothstein (2014) states “long before the shooting of Michael Brown, official racial-isolation policies primed Ferguson for this summer’s events” (p. 1). Rothstein writes how African-Americans were denied access to better jobs, housing, education, and were placed into areas that eventually became slums. Blacks were relocated several times, which eventually “converted towns like Ferguson into new segregated enclaves” (Rothstein, 2014, p. 9). Government policies were a catalyst that caused what is known as white flight, or the movement of white residents to more private residential, upscale areas, in which blacks could not afford or were not permitted to reside. Some neighborhoods used eminent domain laws to keep blacks from moving into white developments. Blacks were targeted with unethical lending rates by banks. Deceptive real estate practices were the norm when it came to selling houses to African American families. Before 1980, laws allowed boundary and redevelopment policies to keep blacks from white neighborhoods. However, in 1980, the federal courts ordered all forms of government to create plans on school and housing integration. Rothstein (2014) adds “public officials ignored the order” and only “devised a busing plan to integrate schools” (p. 4). The housing market collapse, along with exploding interest rates, left the black neighborhoods devastated, as stated by Rosenbaum (2014, p. 9). Ferguson was less that 1% black in 1970, however by the time Michael Brown was killed in 2014, the community was nearly 70% black, with its schools nearly 90% black. In review, Hannah-Jones (2014) relays how the white flight from St. Louis caused businesses and jobs to leave along with the residents. With their departure, the schools also suffered. Schools
It was important for her to be seen as an innocent victim. Because of that, any negative personality traits were most likely ignored. Ferguson elaborated on this in her introduction. “Mary Prince took full advantage of their trust to stake out a path to freedom.” (17). While Mary’s owners were certainly in the wrong for every action, the fact that Mary took advantage of their trust would not be seen as a desirable trait. This is just one example of where the actions Mary took may have been glossed over to put her in the most flattering light. The main way this story caught attention was through Mary’s descriptions of the brutality of slavery. It was there to make the reader sympathize with Mary, and by doing that learn to sympathize with all slaves. If Mary acted out in a way that was unflattering, readers may not sympathize with her as well. The fact that Mary became a Christian is still an important note to keep in mind. Going behind anyone’s back would be seen as wrong, and this would not be acceptable in a book about a Christian woman. This role was so important for Mary to maintain that people were willing to risk losing valuable content in the story in order to avoid making Mary look like a bad
On August 1, 1943, Harlem ?Boiled over,? according to NAACP leader Walter White (NY Times, 17). The start of the event was attributed to one, ?Private Robert Bandy, the 26-year-old Negro soldier?who is charged with attacking a white policeman who was arresting a Negro woman in a Harlem hotel? (New York Times, 17). Rumors soon spread that police officers had killed a black soldier who was trying to protect his mother. This caused a momentous outburst of rioting destroying much of Harlem. The statistics of the riot vary depending on the source, but around 500 persons were injured, five dead, 400-500 arrested, and property damage estimated at 500,000 to a million dollars. ...
In the story The Garies and Their Friends by Frank Webb, one man is responsible for the race riot. The prosecution charges Mr. George Stevens with Inciting a Riot and Seditious Conspiracy. We intend to prove these charges beyond a reasonable doubt. We will do this by presenting overwhelming evidence of his guilt. He manipulated people and circumstances to his full advantage to implement his plan. His agenda was one of violence against innocent Black men and women. These already oppressed citizens, became tragically disenfranchised as a result of his actions. He has torn the fabric of their livelihood into pieces, leaving many homeless. His wanton destruction and ruthless actions deserve harsh punishment by this jury.
The Aaron Burr Trial of 1807, commonly referred to as the Burr Conspiracy, is the setting where Aaron Burr was charged three times over with treason. Burr was not tried the first or second time he was accused, but the third time he was tried in Richmond in 1807, still he was never convicted. Aaron Burr ⎼ the defendant ⎼ was one of the founding fathers of the new nation, as well as the third Vice President of America, he is best known though for his duel with Alexander Hamilton in 1804 which ended with Hamilton’s death. The trial judge was John Marshall ⎼ Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. Finally, the man behind the prosecution was Burr’s own President, Thomas Jefferson ⎼ founding father, author of the Declaration of Independence,
This scandalous case centers on a woman named Katherine Watkins. On Friday, August 18, 1681, Katherine accused a slave by the name of John Long, also known as Jack, of rape. There was some evidence of violence, but there were also outstanding questions about her character and conduct. Those who testified, however, painted a different picture about certain events preceding the crime. They were John Aust, William Harding, Mary Winter, Lambert Tye, Humphrey Smith, Jack White (Negro), Dirk (Negro), and Mingo (Negro). Whether these individuals were so inclined because Katherine Watkins was a Quaker, rather than an Anglican, we can never really know. That certainly fueled the fire, though. The day in question involved an afternoon of cider drinking. Several of the witnesses in the testimonies recounted Mrs. Watkins sexual advances to multiple of Thomas Cocke 's slaves, particularly, a mulatto named Jack. John Aust pleaded that Katherine, at one point, had lifted the shirt of one slave and announced “Dirke thou wilt have a good long thing” (Sex and Relations, 53). She allegedly had thrown another on the bed, kissed him, and, “put her hand into his codpiece” (Sex and Relations, 53). The most interesting piece of evidence that Aust brings forward is that Jack was actually avoiding Watkins at the party, an apparent attempt at avoiding any intimate entanglement with her (Sex and Relations, 52). Finally, he reported that Watkins and Jack had gone into a side room (Sex and Relations, 53). Later in the trial, Humphrey Smith seemingly referred to Aust 's testimony. His deposition suggested that he and Aust had some reservations about Jack 's guilt (Sex and Relations 54). Clearly, the character of the plaintiff was considered important evidence in the trial of a slave for rape. The reasonable extenuating circumstances of the case might have granted the magistrates leave way
and she "articulates her struggle to assert her womanhood" (497). Even with her lack of a higher education, she shows intelligence throughout her writing. She had her own way of getting her points across, one being that a person could not possibly fully understand the degradation of slavery if he/she did not go through it themselves. This is a point within itself because it further relays the fact that slavery was a very horrible, evil and degrading thing.
This investigation is centered on the question “To what extent did racism and anti-Semitism affect the court case of The People V Leo Frank?” The essay focuses on the effect of racism and anti-Semitism against Leo Frank, a Jew from Brooklyn, during and after the trial where he was found guilty. It discusses these forms of racism and anti-Semitism in context of the time period of the court case, from 1913 to 1915. The paper discusses the portrayal of the court case in the papers as well as the public view and their actions, such as the lynching of Leo Frank without any repercussions or charges. The sources used in this investigation were newspapers from this time, court records, as well as other information found in the 1913 Leo Frank Case and Trial Research library as well as in academic Journals. The investigation also references An Unspeakable Crime by Elaine Marie Alphin.
It was suggested that the cause of the Salem Witch Trials was an act of illness. As mentioned before, there was a smallpox epidemic going on during that time. The trials could have been used as a distraction from what was truly going on in the community. Not only that, but there could have been a mental illness as well. It was suggested, “The Salem Witch Trials was a classic example of scapegoating. Fear combined with a “trigger,” a traumatic or stressful event, is what often leads to scapegoating. Fear of the Devil, and witches who did his bidding, was very real in
Repeatedly, politicians, activists, landlords and even many of the residents themselves echoed the sentiment that nothing in the South Bronx mattered: it became “an area not worth saving.” The Charlotte Street that once represented promise as long as the family worked hard had crumbled, becoming just another target for planned arson. Most arson plans spread by word of mouth in the hopes that the fires would hit only buildings themselves, yet not everyone escaped the flames unscathed. Using a 1982 interview with Charles Lefkowitz on the subject of fire victims, Jonnes quotes, “One kid caught in it was a crispy critter by the time we got to him. The other two were badly burnt.”
Living in the south and being colored, was a rough way to live life. The Scottsboro Boys definitely had life rough. They were arrested, they were put on trial, and they were falsely accused by the whites.
David Von Drehle is a journalist for The Washington Post. Von Drehle put a tremendous amount of work into writing Triangle. All of his work paid off because Von Drehle received many awards for Triangle. Some of the awards include Winner of the 2004 Christopher Award, Amazon Top 50 Book of the Year, New York Society Library Book of the Year, New York Public Library Book of the Year, and Washington Post Book World Rave of the Year (Inside Cover). Some of his previous works include Among the Lowest of the Dead: Inside Death Row and Deadlock: The Inside Story of America’s Closest Election (Back Cover). Von Drehle was qualified to write this book because of his occupation, experience, and interest in the event. His occupation is as a journalist and as a journalist he tried to report the story of the fire. Experience wise, Von Drehle used many resources and even got to visit the eighth, ninth, and tenth floors, and the roof, of where the fire occurred, which is now the Brown Building of NYU (Acknowledgements). Von Drehle also spent time doing research in the Library of Congress (Acknowledgements). A major source that he used was the transcribed testimony from the trial of People of the State of New York v. Isaac Harris and Max Blanck. He got help...