Neil Simon and the Use of Buffoon Comedy within his works

1535 Words4 Pages

Neil Simon is arguably one of the greatest American playwrights of the twentieth century. He has brought his unique personality and views to his works. His plays have not only graced Broadway, but many have made it to the screen. Simon uses personal ties in portraying characters familiar to the audience. Simon said once in an interview with Glenn Loney, “Certain types of critics will always look down on comedy. For them, it seems to easy- or it doesn’t have enough substance” (Konas 212). Neil Simon is criticized for lacking substance within his works. However his plays are actual dramatizations of his life, or the life of those he knows best, which utilize buffoon comedy to create substance while keeping a light-hearted ambiance.

Buffoon comedy defines itself as comedy which evokes a laugh because of the degree of absurdity. It is utilized to convey dense ideas while keeping the audience from feeling burnt out. It is important to keep a captive audience and thus buffoon comedy allows for a light airiness while getting across difficult ideas. MELUS, a theatrical magazine which is issues bi-annually, published an article dealing with Neil Simon which focused on his religion and how it played a part in his writing. Walden stated it best, “To Simon the ideal play is where the audience laughs all night but in the last few minutes is touched by a sense of tragedy” (MELUS 81). In all Simon’s works the audiences becomes captivated by the laughs but are touched by the reality.

Neil Simon utilizes buffoon comedy by contrasting characters. He creates over-dramatizations in order for the subtleties of character to emerge. This stark contrast of characters brings attention to their behavior which can be at its worst, rash and ex...

... middle of paper ...

...eatre has failed them. Simon presents a new alternative to predictable. He presents reality which can be laughed at because it is removed. Yet his comedy moves the audience to look inward. As Taylor says, “Only in that Age of Reason, the doctoral dissertation, does that lesser playwright appear to shine forth” (Taylor 46).

Simon uses what he knows to shape what he portrays. His critics may claim that he lacks backbone, yet he provides his audiences with enough support to fill in all of their personal gaps. He gives ample opportunity for his audience and his critics for that matter to place themselves into the scenario. All he asks is that the audience gives him some of their time so in turn he can improve upon it. He allows for an escape that is not literal but figurative from the stress of life into the beautiful subtleties of it.

Open Document