The Negatives of Animal Testing

1042 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Negative impacts of animal testing

Many people may not realize that the majority of products in their own home have been tested on animals; from lipstick and shampoo to dish soap and foot powder. Even the white ink on an M&M has been tested on animals. To some, this statement may be alarming and even disturbing – to others it may not mean much at all. Either way, the debate over animal testing has gained much popularity in recent decades. Animal testing has been done since at least 500 BC; even Aristotle experimented on animals for scientific reasoning. Around 200 AD, dissecting animals in public was actually used as a form of entertainment, people would actually go and watch someone perform a vivisection on an animal. Vivisection is when an organism is dissected while it is still alive (“Animal Testing”). The public did not start objecting animal testing until the 19th century, which was around the time when more people started to adopt domestic pets. In 1875, the first group to protect animals from testing was formed, called the Society for the Protection of Animals Liable to Vivisection (“Animal Testing”). Through the 20th century, companies began testing products on animals before they would be put on the market. It was not until recent years that scientific evidence revealed that animals experience pain much more than what was originally believed. Unfortunately, the agonizing cries of the animals was not convincing enough for the scientists of the past. This is where the animal testing controversy begins (Scott). Animal testing is unnecessary, inhumane, and unreliable. There are many pros and cons that come along with animal testing, but there are usually more cons of animal testing, then there are pros. Animal testing is unnecessary. Some people who are f... ... middle of paper ... ...uct is pulling money from the pockets of these companies and scientists. It is important to be informed on this because people make decisions every day and do not realize that they are supporting animal testing by buying these products. Everyone is involved because they are either supporting it by buying those products, or not supporting it by not buying those products. By being informed on the effects of consumerism has on the welfare of animals, a life can be saved just by buying a different product. Works Cited "Animal Testing." ProConorg Headlines. Animal Testing ProCon, n.d. Web. 12 Apr. 2014. . Ferdowsian, Hope R. "Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding Animal Testing and Research." EBSCO Animals. EBSCO, Sept. 2011. Web. Mar. 2014. Scott, John Paul. Animal Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1958. Print

Show More
Related

  • Argumentative Essay: We Must Eliminate Animal Testing

    613 Words  | 2 Pages

    Approximately two to four million animals have been used in safety tests. Safety tests are conducted with a wide range of chemicals and products, including drugs, vaccines, cosmetics, household cleaners, and packing materials. This raises issues such as the ethics and humaneness of deliberately poisoning animals, thus harming them, for the sake of marketing a new cosmetic or household product.

    Read More

  • animal experimentation

    545 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animals are getting experimented on for products. Animals are getting affected everyday by this problem. They are getting experimented on to see if a product is safe for human beings to use. Medical schools in the United States have stopped using animals for their needs in training.(Driscoll and Finley) In 1983, 150 baboons had to be removed from the University of Pennsylvania Head Injury Clinic for brain damage. (Driscoll and Finley) People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and the Animal Liberation Front removed the baboons from the clinic. (Driscoll and Finley) The results of the experiments are not even that accurate. Nutrition experiments on animals are very inaccurate. PCRM published the article “An Examination of Animal Experiments” that stated “Nutrition is another area where animal experiments have raised repeated problems. While it is easy to feed vitamins, fat, or fiber to animals and to check whether their disease rates rise or fall, the relevance to humans is limited at best, due to major physiological differences between species.” People and organizations, such as PETA and the Humane Society of the United States(HSUS), have been...

    Read More

  • The Necessities of Animal Experimentation

    1270 Words  | 3 Pages

    Writing this paper did not affect my original line of thinking in regards to the topic. I support animal rights in every way, and am extremely against any sort of testing. Observing the “necessities” of animal testing did not, in any way, alter my negative view of animal experimentation.

    Read More

  • We Must Eliminate Animal Testing for Cosmetics

    1515 Words  | 4 Pages

    Animal testing has long played a part in the science of testing, and it still plays a very important role in the medical world. Testing on animals in order to create a cure for AIDS is one thing, but testing on animals for human vanity is another. Animal testing is used to test the safety of a product. It has kept some very unsafe substances out of the cosmetic world. However, in this day in age, animal testing is not the only way to test the safety of a product. Animal testing in cosmetics has decreased over the years. However, it is still used by many companies in America. Animal testing is not only cruel, but it is also unnecessary in today’s advanced scientific world.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing (speech Outline)

    976 Words  | 2 Pages

    A.      After all, the question whether animals should be tested is often hotly debated. B.      Through intense research I have discovered that the issue on whether animals should be experimented upon, or “vivisection”, has cropped up in history as early as the 17th century. III.

    Read More

  • Pros of Animal Experimentation

    921 Words  | 2 Pages

    Animal testing has gone back as far as three hundred B.C.E with the Greek physician and philosopher, Aristotle (*). Then there was Galen, a Greek physician, who studied animals in Rome and learned more about medicine, made advancements in understanding anatomy, physiology, pathology, and pharmacology. To modern society, Galen is referred to as being the father of vivisection. In the twelfth century in Spain, Ibn Zuhr, an Arab physician who made use of animal experimentation that led to testing the effectiveness of surgical procedures, first on animals, and then applying the information to human patients. Though most of his testings were on goats, much of his research went into postmortem autopsies and dissections. (Hajar) (Naik)

    Read More

  • The History of Animal Experimentation and Testing

    964 Words  | 2 Pages

    The argument surrounding animal testing is older than the United States of America, dating back to the 1650’s when Edmund O’Meara stated that vivisection, the dissection of live animals, is an unnatural act. Although this is one of the first major oppositions to animal testing, animal testing was being practiced for millennia beforehand. There are two sides opposing each other in the argument of animal testing, and the argument is one of the oldest arguments still being debated today. The history of animal experimentation and testing, and the arguments surrounding it, has an expansive and somewhat extensive history. Some of the first medical research that was conducted on living animals was done by Aelius Galenus, better known as Galen, in the second century C.E. There have been examples of animal testing in earlier dates, but Galen devoted his life to understanding science and medicine, so he is attributed to being the father of vivisection.

    Read More

  • The Use of Animal Research

    1419 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, there are many pros and cons about animal testing for example, some of the pros would be, that animal testing gives us the most accurate effect on substance on a livin...

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    450 Words  | 1 Pages

    In today’s world there’s many controversies that many people don’t agree with such as animal testing for scientific use. Animal testing is a subject that is greatly divided, with a great deal of passion, emotion and ideas on both sides regarding the ethics of this practice. On the other side some are still at a cross-road with the subject, while agreeing with animal testing under special circumstances but not for other uses.

    Read More

  • Cruel and Inhuman ways of Animal Testing

    1269 Words  | 3 Pages

    Animal testing is a cruel and inhumane action that humans cause by holding different kinds of animals captive in small cells and testing dangerous and toxic chemicals on them. “More than 100 million animals are poisoned, burned, crippled,and abused in other ways in the U.S labs each year” (PETA Top Five Shocking) because they are being tested. Dangerous and toxic chemicals are tested on the animals to make sure it won’t harm humans. Some animals don’t last very long because the chemicals kill them very quickly and painfully. There are many famous brands that do animal testing like Covergirl, Aveeno, Olay, Old Spice, and even the famous toothpaste brand, Crest. The kinds of animals tested on are mice, fish, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, farm animals (like horses), birds, cats, dogs, mini-pigs, and non-human primates, monkeys, and chimpanzees. That is a lot of different animals! Scientists believe that animals have traits similar to humans like the stomach and eyes which is the reason why they are tested. The way animals are tested is extremely painful. For example, products for cleaning are tested on animals like rabbits. What scientists do is rub the toxic product on the rabbits skin, ears, and they even put it in their eyes which very painful for an innocent creature like a rabbit. When you see the labels on cleaning products, you see that there are signs that warn people to not put the product near their eyes or mouth. It’s basically the results that scientists saw in an animal when experimenting on them. In the 1930’s, very little regulation existed for sales of personal care and cleaning products. Companies were not required to test the product or even do any research on how toxic the chemicals are. More than a dozen...

    Read More

  • Effects Of Animal Testing

    1495 Words  | 3 Pages

    Many businesses today test their products on animals before putting them on the market, which creates a controversial issue. The effects of animal testing can be beneficial in some ways but there are other efficient ways to test these products without putting the life of an animal in harm. Photos have been revealed to the public of the after-effects on animals from certain products, and after seeing these photos it should make everyone realize the cruelty of this and put a stop to animal testing. Many argue that animals should be used for research; however, the potential harm and suffering that can result from the testing is inhumane.

    Read More

  • Is Animal Testing Necessary?

    2044 Words  | 5 Pages

    For years animal testing has been a very controversial issue around the globe. Animal testing has been very beneficial to people, but has cause an up stir to animal rights activists and organizations like PETA. “The earliest references to animal ex...

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    1069 Words  | 3 Pages

    Using animal testing has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Animal testing is everywhere, it's used in hair products, cosmetics, accessories, and even medicine. People have different feelings about animals, whether it's about research or having them as companions. It’s a sensitive subject and is widely discussed all over the world. Although illegal animal testing is cruel to animals, animal testing should be legal all around the world because it helps researchers find new medical drugs and treatments, it ensures the safety of medical drugs since animal bodies are the closely relate to human bodies, and animal research helps animals too.

    Read More

  • Disadvantages of Animal Testing

    1247 Words  | 3 Pages

    As seen throughout the research done throughout this paper, it is clear the animals should not be tested on, regardless of the circumstance. This is because there are plenty of alternatives to these tests that will not harm animals and will be much safer in general, animals are very often mistreated and abused in the process of testing for product safety, and the results of the tests performed on animals might not have the same effect on humans. These three reasons are why animal testing should be completely banned in the U.S. If animal testing continues, then the lives of many innocent animals will be taken away from them for a reason that doesn’t add up to the lives of animals being taken away.

    Read More

  • Animal Testing In Medicine Essay

    1526 Words  | 4 Pages

    For years researchers have relied on animal trials to test every type of product that is put on the market. They are subjected to cosmetics, food additives, and household and industrial products; all of which do not concern animals. While some in both the medical and scientific community believe animal testing is beneficial it is morally offensive, delays possible cures and is completely unnecessary.

    Read More

More about The Negatives of Animal Testing

Open Document